Imgflip Logo Icon

How many dangerous drugs will you take the rest of your life for Covid-related heart, lung, kidney and other chronic ailments.

How many dangerous drugs will you take the rest of your life for Covid-related heart, lung, kidney and other chronic ailments. | YOU WON'T TALE THE COVID-19 VACCINE, BECAUSE IT IS A DANGEROUS DRUG? HOW MANY "DANGEROUS DRUGS," DO YOU THINK THEY WILL GIVE YOU IN THE ICU TO TREAT YOUR COVID-19 INFECTION?  THAT'S NOT COUNTING "MEDICATION ERRORS." | image tagged in politics | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
157 views 8 upvotes Made by LarryCaird 5 years ago in politics
45 Comments
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Vaccine technology that was developed over the last 20 years, or experimental treatment devised on response to covid. Mmmmm which is really had more clinical time????
4 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Don't forget the creator of the mRNA Vaccine telling people to not get the shot. Interesting that the one person that knows more about his creation than anyone else got censored all over the place.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
But you heard it, somehow.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=mRNA++vaccine+inventor+says+not+to+get+vaccine&t=ffab&atb=v264-1&ia=web
0 ups, 5y
Oh... no shit. I dont know a single parent with a child under the age of 16 that has given their child the shot. So, the media may be saying, it in my REAL WORLD, it isnt happening.

What is happening, is 26 YO's who think they have strong immune systems, dying in the ICU. That is my state, Florida. We get all of our rights here! Thank God!
0 ups, 5y
I will reply after I read it, but .y first thought already, os, oh, here we go with a ducksuckgo search to a blog....owned by some nutjob accosiayed with that group. Dont worry, I'll doy diligence e on the money. It is after all, all one should have to do.
0 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Dr. Malone is the "creator of the RNA Vaccine," as much as Pete Best was responsible for the success of the Beatles. Malone did bench science that was significant to an aspect of the science, early in the process. He did important work, as did many others that contributed to the scientific knowledge Dr. Katalin Kariko used in developing the formula for the Covid-19 Vaccine. The scientific press, and most of the scientific world credits Dr. Kariko. correctly, with this accomplishment.

Malone has gone so far as to say he was Kariko's "mentor." Kariko says they have only met once, when he invited her to make a presentation concerning her work to his colleagues. This led Dr. Malone to bitterly complain "I've been written out of history by Kati." For her part, Dr. Keriko does not seek credit for anything but her personal work. Malone has become a gadfly and favorite guest on extreme right wing broadcasts, because of his willingness to prostitute whatever cred he has to help promote the anti-Vax movement. On the other hand the overwhelming majority of serious scientists recognize the success of the Covid-19 Vaccines in preventing hospitalization and deaths of people from the disease. By the way, Covid-19 did not exist at the time Malone did his most important work in this area.
0 ups, 5y
https://openvaers.com/covid-data
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
<<serious scientists recognize the success of the Covid-19 Vaccines in preventing hospitalization and deaths of people from the disease>>

in the UK, figures published on the UK .goc site show clearly that vaccinated people are dying from delta 4.5 times higher rate than unvaxxed

see table 5 on pp. 22/23 here ...

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1012644/Technical_Briefing_21.pdf
1 up, 5y,
3 replies
The BBC called out this disinformation on July 1: One conspiracy site even claimed vaccinated people were dying at higher rates than those who had not received the jab, which is untrue.

They went on to note that, at the time this disproved "study." was published the group of people dying were the elderly vaccinated, and the unvaccinated in the "study," were young and otherwise healthy. Proving that figures don't lie but liars "figure."
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
you're not having a good night larry ...maybe go grab some sleep?!
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
the report was published to the .gov website just two weeks ago

you didn't even look at it, but yet you "debunked" it
1 up, 5y
I read the entire 35-page report. It lists raw data that are consistent with the explanation that the Vaccinated were heavily weighted toward old, sick patients and the unvaccinated were young, healthy people. Nowhere in the report is there any narrative that supports the leaps made by the publication you posted. But, if these are the conclusions of the quack Dr. Joseph Mercola, your site has no credibility with the scientific community. Mercola exists to sell products that he creates to provide "cures," he cannot prove. He is the ultimate Snake Oil salesman. You have zero credibility quoting him or his publication.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
<<One conspiracy site>> jfc larry ...the report is from the .gov website!
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Here is the definition of MRNA: Messenger RNA (mRNA) is a single-stranded RNA molecule that is complementary to one of the DNA strands of a gene. The mRNA is an RNA version of the gene that leaves the cell nucleus and moves to the cytoplasm where proteins are made. During protein synthesis, an organelle called a ribosome moves along the mRNA, reads its base sequence, and uses the genetic code to translate each three-base triplet, or codon, into its corresponding amino acid.

The World Health Organization never changed this meaning.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
they changed the definition of "vaccine"

that wasn't entirely clear tho'

then again, given your background you probably already knew that ;)
0 ups, 5y,
2 replies
They did not change the definition of vaccine. It is: "a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease." This is exactly what the Covid-19 vaccine does.
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
odd that the new definition also provides a pretty good explanation of what Ivermectin and Hydroxychloriquine do and yet ...
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
there are links in the article to archived pages ...do you have an adult there who can show you how to follow links?

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html

fun fact: they also changed the definition of "herd immunity" this year, but then again given your background ...etc
1 up, 5y
Rather than accept what someone else says the CDC says, I went to the CDC. They have a publication called "A Glossary of Terms." The following is from that publication:

"V
Vaccination: Listen media icon[MP3]
The physical act of administering any vaccine or toxoid.

Vaccinia: Listen media icon[MP3]
A virus related to the smallpox and cowpox viruses, which is used in smallpox vaccine.

Vaccine: Listen media icon[MP3]
A suspension of live (usually attenuated) or inactivated microorganisms (e.g. bacteria or viruses) or fractions thereof administered to induce immunity and prevent infectious diseases and their sequelae. Some vaccines contain highly defined antigens (e.g., the polysaccharide of Haemophilus influenzae type b or the surface antigen of hepatitis B); others have antigens that are complex or incompletely defined (e.g. Bordetella pertussis antigens or live attenuated viruses)"

Funny. That does not look anything like what your site says is the CDC's definitions. The truth is out there. Just step away from the extreme right wing echo chamber for a minute.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The first outline of the Human Genome was published exactly 20-years ago. The M-RNA vaccine is a product of the knowledge that has been collect in the 20-years since. They didn't invent the science for this vaccine. They just applied the best science that was available when the need arose. That is what Salk did when he came up with his Polio vaccine 70-years ago. If he was finding a vaccine for Polio today, he would have the advantage of 70-more years of scientific advances and his would also be an M-RNA vaccine. The Covid-19 vaccine uses better-more advanced science than all the vaccines you have already taken.
1 up, 5y
Exactly how my physician explained it to. The technology has been there, the virus vector has not. Hard to explain rocket science when they only understand rocket goes up....
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Nope.

This is just fear mongering…

Most Covid patients do not end up in an ICU.
1 up, 5y,
3 replies
The May Clinic humbly disagrees with you:

Imaging tests taken months after recovery from COVID-19 have shown lasting damage to the heart muscle, even in people who experienced only mild COVID-19 symptoms. This may increase the risk of heart failure or other heart complications in the future."

Many who have had even mild Covid-19 face a life of taking medicines for its long lasting side effects.
1 up, 5y
"Mayo Clinic."
0 ups, 5y
Also to the brain center having to do with the sense of smelling...
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
1. MOST COVID PATIENTS DO NOT END UP IN AN ICU.

2. KEEP RE-READING #1 UNTIL IT SINKS IN.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
And, you can get mild covid and have heart disease he rest of your life. I keep saying that and it does not sink in.
0 ups, 5y
Oh no!

Then, we’re all doomed since the “vaccine” does not protect us from mild cases of Covid, and neither do the masks!

F**k… might as well enjoy life while I can! 🙂
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
none that haven't been rigorously tested
0 ups, 5y,
3 replies
I worked at a Medical Center that conducted many clinical trials. Tell me, what is your definition of "rigorously tested?" My response instead, "Only the ones prescribed by my doctor."
[deleted]
1 up, 5y
rigorously tested, like all normal drugs that are in the public domain

would your doctor prescribe Ivermectin or Hydroxychloriquine ...given that they are two of the most "rigorously tested", trusted and prescribed drugs on the planet? then again, given your background you already knew that, right!?
1 up, 5y
The vax is being rigorously tested in Brazil... as of Aug 19, 2021... https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/over-32000-people-dead-in-brazil-following-covid-19-vaccines-according-to-official-media-report/?fbclid=IwAR3FWkFVFJ23oU0S9S25hF1qE26lSBpnFR_07oLuWiFTYn0Afkti3FyYdTw
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Do you know that every year, hundreds (and some years, more than a thousand) of "rigorously tested" AND FDA APPROVED medications are RECALLED because of ADVERSE EFFECTS, up to and including DEATH? Sort of like these RUSHED vaccines they're PUSHING on us to control population! And before you ask, NO, I'm not an MD but I can READ and do my own RESEARCH.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The drugs recalls are done because of rigorous and ongoing monitoring and testing. In most cases manufacturing or environmental factors, not efficacy are the reasons. For example, one drug I read about on the FDA report did not have enough of the listed active ingredient. Another was infected by a post manufacturing mold. Another contained fine particles of foreign matter. The report for the latest year available had 377 products recalled. Your "research," apparently missed this information.
0 ups, 5y
"Apparently missed information" or NOT, the point is that the FDA and CDC CANNOT be trusted because they've been EXPOSED as POLITICAL WEAPONS of the government; and in the case of Covid, they've PROVEN to be MEDICAL TERRORISTS!
[deleted]
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
And yet, there are millions of people that got the virus, never went to hospital, and still do not have dangerous drugs in their system walking amongst us. The virus is not one size fits all and neither is the vaccine. You go live your life and stop trying to tell people what to do and how to live their life.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
What does the Mayo Clinic studies of patients say awaits many of those who choose the infection over the vaccine?

"Heart. Imaging tests taken months after recovery from COVID-19 have shown lasting damage to the heart muscle, even in people who experienced only mild COVID-19 symptoms. This may increase the risk of heart failure or other heart complications in the future.

Lungs. The type of pneumonia often associated with COVID-19 can cause long-standing damage to the tiny air sacs (alveoli) in the lungs. The resulting scar tissue can lead to long-term breathing problems.

Brain. Even in young people, COVID-19 can cause strokes, seizures and Guillain-Barre syndrome — a condition that causes temporary paralysis. COVID-19 may also increase the risk of developing Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease."
[deleted]
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
There is a calculator online to predict your chance of being exposed…Google it. According to the calculator I have a 0.004% chance of catching it. I really don’t think that is worth me worrying about. You can do what you feel is best, but you can also blow it out your ass if you think you have any right to tell me what I need to do.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Those sound like famous last words to me. I wish you the best of luck, none-the-less.
[deleted]
0 ups, 5y
Or words of wisdom, depending on the listener
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
HCQ and Ivermectin both have a long term record of exceptional and widespread safety and when used in early treatment are highly effective at keeping patients out of hospitalization
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
And, your M.D. is from? Don't bother to reply. I don't need to read more harmful disinformation.
1 up, 5y
Someone can’t handle the truth
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
YOU WON'T TALE THE COVID-19 VACCINE, BECAUSE IT IS A DANGEROUS DRUG? HOW MANY "DANGEROUS DRUGS," DO YOU THINK THEY WILL GIVE YOU IN THE ICU TO TREAT YOUR COVID-19 INFECTION? THAT'S NOT COUNTING "MEDICATION ERRORS."