And yet they are not. We are only trying to suppress fictional characters, dead people and multiple votes from the same person. I know that is very upsetting to the Democrat party because they have been getting away with this for decades. Also we want a paper trail from those easily programmable voting machines.
And just doing that the Democrats are doing what they always do, they are crying racism. That used to work for them but they've cried racism just 8,802,938,439,854,508,234,523,845,749.6 too many times.
You're trying to suppress your imagination then.
And there IS a paper trail from the voting machines. How do you think the hand recounts were conducted?
And curbing voting options has nothing to do with integrity.
So what you are saying is that eliminating or reducting cheating is "curbing voting options"? In case you are wondering our voting system was designed to give the America people an equal voice in the choice of who will serve us in our government.
Our election system was not designed to put and keep Democrats in office. That is not the purpose of elections in a free nation. That is how elections are done in socialist nations.
Years ago a I worked with a person who had immigrated to America from East Germany after Soviet communism collapsed. He told me that "democrat socialism" gave people the right to vote but it did not give them the right to vote for the candidate they wanted to. They were told who to vote for. The whole thing was a charade to make it appear to be democratic from the outside.
The America Democrats have created a system where they do not need to coerce people. Because they cannot coerce Americans to vote for their guy when more than half of the US is opposed to socialism. So instead Democrats have brought in voting machines that are connected to the internet. They can be programmed to produce a predetermined outcome plus Democrats are still doing what they have been doing for over (at least) half a century, inventing fictional people to vote, voting in behalf of dead people who haven't been taken off the voter roles and busing illegal immigrants around from one polling place to another to another to vote for Democrats.
Yes this stuff has been going on for far too long and it is time that the Republicans grew a pair and actually did something to stop it.
I think it will be very telling that if they can put all of those safeguards in place to see in the next election that Democrats don't really have much of a voice in this nation. Not because they have been suppressed but because most people in this country love America and hate socialism. Unfortunately that is true for most Americas who are not millennials. Millennials have been brainwashed and under educated by the left. Far to many of them lack the mental skills and maturity to understand freedom. They think they can vote in the most vile and corrupt socialists in the world and still be free.
If you say that enough times you might actually start believing it. You are very quick to say who isn't a socialist or what isn't socialism isn't but have you ever said who is a socialist or what socialism is?
I think you tried to convince me that the Scandinavian countries were socialist but you are flat out wrong about that.
"Sure I did.
Still waiting for an American politician to advocate that."
Do they have to? What is the difference between no private ownership and the government deciding what you can do with your property? If I own my house free and clear but fail to pay property taxes the government will take my land away. That being the case do I really own my land.
I think that part of socialism has been forced on us already. The only difference is I am talking about land. The only other possession the government wants to control is firearms and the Democrats are talking like they already own your weapons.
Democrats also act and talk like they own your money.
It is all piece by piece. It is a death of a thousand cuts. That is how the Progressives have been slowing turning the US into a socialist nation. It started in 1913 with President Woodrow Wilson. Their goal is a progression into socialism, not a revolution.
There is a problem here. Monmouth leans left while Rasmussen leans right. Both are probably just as accurate as the other. However, when you look up the accuracy ratings, the news media leans hard left and so they will always rate liberal polls high and conservative polls low. I did find a couple of rating web sites that seemed to have less of a bias and they both were rated about the same. I also found a lot of left leaning sites and Rasmussen was naturally rated much lower and all of the hardcore liberal pollsters got a high rating.
So it is obvious to me that you clearly got your 32% from one of the left leaning rating services.
And the fact that Monmouth would lean towards the side of thinking that the majority doesn't believe that there was fraud is really no surprise. It depends on the sample set and how they worded the question. If Monmouth asked a higher percentage of answers that support the left's position. The left is on a mission it misreport as much as possible to promote their narrative. That happens some on the right but I have noticed that right leaning news and everything else strive much more for accuracy and honesty than the left ever does.
The left lives under the rule, "the ends justify the means". That is very bad because it is also how the act in everything. That is why they can call a Texas bill that just want to tighten up the voting process to insure that the person voting is the person who they say they are and that they have not already voted, a voter suppression bill. It is really easy to find out the truth because Texas Senate Bill 5 is online. You can actually read it yourself.
The reason why the Supreme Court upheld Arizona's voting restrictions is because the left has no case. They cannot prove racism when no exists. The court upheld two provisions in the bill 6 to 3. Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan, the three stooges of the Court, voted based on the Democrat lie while the others had no choice but to vote on the truth.
More like the right is much more likely to propagate and believe fake news than the "left". Example: plant based beer and banning meat.
And when you place unnecessary and uncalled for restrictions on voting that disproportionately affect minorities, hell yeah you're racist (and even if the effect was proportionate to race, that's still pretty anti-democratic).
What are you talking about with plant based beer banning meat. All beer is plant based. I think when the UN collapses the economy and push their global socialist government on us they might ban meat. I haven't read that anywhere. It's just an opinion and I could very well be wrong.
All you have to do is read the bill. There are no new restrictions on legal voters. Mail in voting still exists.
I think you've fallen in the left's racism trap. You're repeating the "blacks are to stupid to [fill in the blank]" line of BS. Only in this case you are say blacks are to corrupt to only as themselves and only one time.
That is what it sounded like in the article. I don't even drink any alcoholic beverages and never have and even I know that ALL beer is plant based. In fact ALL alcoholic drinks are plant based. I am sure that Kudlow is fully aware that beer is plant based. He is using that term in sarcasm of the limits on beef production.
If they did do an outright ban on beef that wouldn't bother me too much. I like pork and chicken better anyway.
Faux and your lot went nuts over the false idea of Biden banning meat, and "forcing everyone to drink plant-based beer".
That's your side.
And if you're talking about the Texas bill, it bans drive through and 24 hour voting, bans local election officials from sending out mail in ballot applications, and makes absentee voting harder.
Actually read the bill before pretending fascism is great.
How is it "my side" when I have never heard anything like that before? Whats the deal with "plant based beer"? How is beer not plant based? It's made out of fermented hops. Hops is a plant. There's no meat, fish or dairy involved as far as I know. So what is the difference between plain old beer and "plant based beer"?
Nor have I ever heard of anyone claiming that Joe Biden was going to ban meat.
You may have heard that from "my side" but it is NOT in the mainstream of my side. There are nut jobs on both sides and they do not speak for either. Alex Jones is supposedly on "my side" but you can have him. I don't want him.
"And if you're talking about the Texas bill, it bans drive through and 24 hour voting, bans local election officials from sending out mail in ballot applications, and makes absentee voting harder."
NONE of what you just said suppresses anyone's vote. My goodness!! I grew up with the only way to vote was to show up at the polling place on the day of the election between 7:00am and 7:00pm. There was no mail in ballots, no early voting, none of what we have now. Yet everyone, including black people, somehow managed to VOTE.
And your upset because 24 hour drive through voting is banned???
Mail in ballots will still be accepted. The problem is that many people ended up being sent multiple ballots. Now you have to apply for a mail in ballot instead of them just being sent out randomly. To anyone but a Democrat those extra ballots would be thrown away. But to the "the ends justify the means" Democrats they are obligated by their corrupt ideology to fill out every ballot that was sent to them.
Yes, that will be a major inconvenience to Democrats but boo freaking hoo. It is long past time to stop them from cheating.
If you want to vote by mail you can apply for it. Big freaking deal!!! If you're too stupid to apply for a ballot then perhaps you shouldn't be voting in the first place. AND you still can always just show up in person on election day just like how we used to do it.
How will it make absentee ballots harder to get? Will you have to actually apply for them just like you have always had to do? Is that the problem?
"Actually read the bill before pretending fascism is great"
Excuse me! Fascism is on YOUR side. Fascism is socialism's twin brother. Mussolini made some tweaks to socialism and called it fascism.
So that is why I never heard of that. I don't watch Fox News. So apparently Larry Kudlow was being sarcastic with this "plant based beer". It was in response to the provision in the Green New Deal to limit the number of cattle to cut down on cow farts. That explains it. I was wondering why anyone in their right mind would think that beer is anything other than plant based.
Limiting cattle is just one of the minor provisions in the Green New Deal to worry about. That bill is unachievable because we will go bankrupt trying to achieve it. So in a way it may not directly ban meat but when the economy collapses (which is what the Green New Deal, the Great Reset and Agenda 2030 is all about) no one will be able to afford meat because money will be worthless.
Jesus Christ, it hurt my head trying to read that. Let me fix it for you...
'Those' works just as well as 'these', idiot. (Never start a sentence with "and") Even if it isn't, that's not the point. Even still, grammar doesn't matter very much on the internet.