Fewer police creates more unnecessary deaths. Defund the Democrat Party.

tl;dr
who the f**k writes an entire textbook into a meme?

Synthetic-Mantis, I created this meme. I used to go by the user name "The_Other_Abbey_Normal" but I changed it because of the original Abby_Normal on this web site.

If I could have worded this meme any pithier I would have. I don't like wordy memes either.

my apologies; forgot who you were for one minute

No worries.

Change the channel, Imgflip Troll™!

But we understand the struggle- "readin' is hard!"

"Imgflip Troll™!"

boo hoo go cry me a river

"But we understand the struggle- "readin' is hard!""

so is providing sources, apparently

"so is providing sources, apparently"

If you were not already living in an intentional echo chamber, you would know that this meme is accurate. You are not interested in facts and truth, hence your decision to be a liberal/leftist.

And perhaps no one cares what you want . . .

"If you were not already living in an intentional echo chamber"

eyyy if i had a penny for every time i heard some hypocrisy from you. lmfao braindead

"You are not interested in facts and truth, hence your decision to be a liberal/leftist"

if you replaced the phrase "liberal/leftist" with "imgflip m/politics pleb", you'd basically describe yourself and 90% of the users on this entire site

"And perhaps no one cares what you want . . ."

they're still giving it to me :)

I wouldn't trust somebody about blm who got the age of blm wrong

That's actually one of the few things he got right.

According to Wikipedia the organization called [only a small handful of] Black Lives Matter [and the rest can go play on a freeway in LA] was found July 13th, 2013.

you said 6 years, it's 7 (almost 8)

And, therefore, we can safely conclude that I am a human being and am prone to make a mistake every once in a while.

We can also conclude that unless you are without any flaws or imperfections that you also every once in a while makes a mistake.

And that there are different kinds of mistakes. One of the most common has to do with numbers. But jumping to a conclusion that everything else I said up this point hinges on this one issue is also a mistake. A colossal mistake.

In other words..... So.... what's your point?

thanks for admitting your mistake.
but I would like you to correct SydneyB, they keep defending you.

Is there some bigger issue that I am unaware of that you got so hung up on how many years ago BLM was formed? I mean that in all sincerity. I see you are arguing with SydneyB below about that. It must be a bigger deal to you then I would have ever thought. I honestly do not care if BLM was around for thousands of years or just a few seconds. It makes no difference to me.

I don't think he is defending me and far be it for me to tell anyone else to stop doing what they want to do.

He said 6 years
It's 7, almost 8 years
problem?

OMG! That completely ruined his point! Deflect elsewhere, child.

HAH! YOU LOST THE ARGUMENT SO YOU'RE PULLING OUT THE DEFLECTION CARD!

I CAN'T DISPUTE HIS POINT SO I'LL POINT OUT HE WAS OFF BY A YEAR!

Child tier debating.

Like a few people been saying: let #BLM keep killing each other, sooner or later they're gonna snap out of #BLM and then they'll be WANTING to fund the police, and the cops are gonna say: "Nope, yall didn't want me helping yo asses"

Might I see the source for your terrific claims?

No.

eyyy can't debate for a dime

As if you were worthy of the time and effort . . .

^ahahaha that's rich

When I went by "The_Other_Abbey_Normal", you and I had a lot of good conversations here on ImgFlip.

THANK YOU for declining to humor the liberal idiot who does not really want the facts in the first place.

How am I a liberal idiot by wanting to know the source? Did you just make a generalized assumption? Why, yes. Yes, you did.

Usually libtards (or libturds) want sources, so they can back up their own false claims. But I don't think you're a libturd tho lol :3

I just get tired of being asked that question. We all have the same internet. If I can find it then anyone can find it. Not to mention every time I provided a source to someone they lampoon it. The attack the author or the website I found it on.

It's like you said. They really don't want the facts in the first place. So this will be my answer to anyone who wants me to give them my sources. It is a diversionary tactic and I am not playing that game. If they want to know the facts they can go do a search on the internet just like I did.

You’d be less tired if you answered the question.

If I can find it then so can you. Don't be lazy.

I haven't been lazy. On the contrary, I've spent hours looking over gun related violence in anticipation of either backing up your claim or discrediting it. First of all, I want you to know that your meme makes perfect sense to me. I just want you to back up your claims as they may seem extraordinary to people who actually need the convincing. I'm not among them. However, I'm also not going to upvote something that potentially has made up statistics in it.

From what I've been able to find, part of it is actually true. We did see an increase in about 5000 gun related violence in the US in 2020, half of those were suicides. So, your numbers of 2000 is not entirely inaccurate. Where I suspect you are wrong, or rather have inserted your personal opinion, is where you say 99% of the police shootings were justified. I've not been able to find any conclusive data that supports that claim other than wishful thinking.

It's not a hard ask to ask for sources. I realize there are people who are intellectually dishonest and use it as a way to waste your time and I can understand how I might come off as one of those people. Regardless, you don't win by letting them intimidate you into hiding your sources. They win by successfully discrediting you solely on your lack of accountability. It makes you look like you're making everything up. True, there will be dozens of people who are going to blindly accept your numbers and upvote your meme simply because they agree with your sentiment but as anyone should know, the court of popular opinion is irrelevant to the facts.

Which was all I was asking for.

Thank you.

If you'd like the numbers on justified shootings I'll get them for ya! ^_^

-BunBun69

https://imgflip.com/i/56u8zz

Here ya go!
Racism exists but I hope this restores some faith in humanity for you! Love you and hope ya have a blessed lifetime!!

-BunBun69

With respect, that is not a source.

And the screenshot alone omits information you are claiming.

Not to mention that it makes the assumption that those killed by cops were arrested/convicted.

There is no need to arrest/convict a suspect who is dead.

I'm not being a smart ass. I'm merely pointing out something that puts a dent in your otherwise fantastic attempt at constructive reasoning.

Well I cannot find the links atm. But I'll see if I can!
And no it makes the argument of arrests vs general kills.
But of course I'm only a teenager so I could be wrong. I was very tired and battling with many demons(Metaphorically) when I made the post.

I'll try to find the sources!

Then remain a frustrated troll.