MORE EVIDENCE THAT THIS "INSURRECTION" WAS A FALSE FLAG OP!

Right?? Total Rick roll on the country.

Enough evidence for any normal person to process as truth but we are dealing with agenda-driven, low-IQ, mentally deranged 'anti-Americans'.

Thank you!

I remember seeing the guy with blood on his hand trying to amp up the crowd and listening and saying to myself this isn’t right. He is playing a part.

Right...what WAS I thinking?

chill dude

I am agreeing with you, fool.
Perhaps you should "chill dude".

i am very chill rn

Why is the government not allowing ANY of the security camera footage from the Capital building on Jan 6th available to the public? There have been FOIA's filed to find out what they show but they are being ignored.

All we have is footage take by the media, the same media that was a part of of the Democrats plan to accuse Trump of inciting sedition so that they could impeach him again.

I have seen two private citizen videos now that showed the protestors calling for the people to remain peaceful and do what the police said. I know there was damage that happened to the Capitol Bldg but perhaps there is a whole lot more to what happened than what the media is letting us know.

The only shooting was from a cop who shot a woman who was apparently just standing there doing nothing.

I smell yet another Democrat plot because now the government is acting like if you voted for Trump you are a terrorist.

I supposed freedom will always strike terror in the hearts of narcissistic control freaks who want to replace our American born system of government with a system of government that has caused death, torture, misery and poverty everywhere it has been tried.

What is a Cop supposed to do about the election??

?

misread the meme

Misunderstood is the right word actually

And what does this prove? It doesn't change the fact that the Trump Supporters stormed the Capitol. It may prove that not all were down with killing Congress Members.

They didn't "storm" the capital. How do you "storm" a building that the doormen are holding the doors open for you?
Any one claiming they want to kill a Congressman is a fringe nut and should be e taken seriously and prosecuted.
There are quite a few nutz on the Left who claim they want to kill Republican congressmen.

Well it could be both with some police letting them in and some police trying to stop them! Many people on the left believe some were loyal to Trump and let them in.

Then why didn't the Feds frog-march those individual Capital Cops before the tribunal they've been conducting since February?
Why haven't we seen any convictions of those you claim to be "loyal to Trump"??

A false flag? Seriously? There are people on the left who think similar things about BLM riots. That they were encouraged. There is even some circumstantial evidence to back it up in some cases. Even
a couple of Boogaloo incidents that were confirmed, but that doesn't really matter does it?

I'd be interested in seeing an investigation that looks into the possibility, but the most likely scenario is what has already been reported both by the police themselves and media outlets on both sides. I'm looking forward to the findings of the bipartisan capitol commission... ;)

https://www.tmz.com/2021/01/19/capitol-rioter-screams-at-cops-asking-where-backup-is-denounces-siege/

"Why are you letting this happen? Why haven't you called for backup? Where is your damned backup?"

Where was the backup is a question a lot of us have asked - but those specific officers standing where they were (in theory) supposed to be is not evidence of anything. We don't know what their orders were and no guarantee of what could have happened to those officers had they tried to intervene.

I think the best you can get out of this is that it was entrapment, and even then I believe you have to prove that it was encouraged by the police, not just allowed.

More damming are the police who opened barricades.

Even if police let it happen - that's no guarantee that their motives were false flag. About 1/8th of the rioters were former military, police, and government service. There have been firings and resignations over this.

One of the theories about why police were slow to accept intelligence that they should be concerned - police assumed that people who 'were on their side' wouldn't get out of hand. How could people flying thin blue line flags storm the capitol? How indeed...

I mean it is common knowledge that the mayor and commissioner turned down secret service and federal troops, even as things were getting out of hand.

Its easy to arm-chair quarterback this one. Left or right its easy to see malice here, but it is worth remembering that this was pretty much unprecedented.

The pentagon offered help but that was days before the riots and I don't know that they (the police) had the proper intelligence reporting to make a good decision there. *That is a point of concern, because the idea that we have intelligence but it isn't getting to the right people is troubling.* One of DHS's missions is to do that.

I believe there were 300+ NG, but they were being used for traffic. I know people were apparently concerned about the optics of Armed soldiers guarding our transition. I'm sure that sounded a lot more reasonable at the time.

According to the timeline, things turned bad pretty quickly. With the military chain of command what it is, it isn't necessarily easy to call in a bunch of troops. Especially since they aren't cops and aren't really expected to respond like that. They would have needed to be prepared and briefed, equipped, etc. Transportation would need to be arranged. What they should have done is accepted the help with an understanding to have them on standby. But again, that's easy to say in hindsight.

A lot of the responses are like that. I bet in the future they will drill this to death and always have a plan for how to respond to such threats and by the time (hopefully never) its needed again we will probably have relaxed our standards again.

Oh, stop.
No one thinks that about the BLM and Antifa riots. They may say it, but they sure as hell know that the BLM and Antifa riots were carried out by members of both movements.

The cops think so
https://www.npr.org/sections/live-updates-protests-for-racial-justice/2020/07/28/896515022/minneapolis-police-reportedly-identify-viral-umbrella-man-as-white-supremacist

Then we have this:
https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2020/06/16/air-force-sergeant-charged-in-killing-of-federal-officer-in-california/

Was this before or after they shot that woman?

My guess is before, but I don't know.
You tell me. It doesn't matter.
The cops did NOTHING when this guy was pleading with them to stop what was going on right in front of them.
It's almost as if they were told to not interfere until the situation was at a boiling point.
Either way, there job was to stop it and they stood there in there gladiator gear with their thumb up their asses.

Maybe they were told to stand aside at that point. They didn't have the numbers to stop the crowd without firing on them. Does that show lack of leadership (they probably needed authorization to deploy tear gas or the like), a decision to not engage and escalate things, or merely that they had orders to do something else. Tactically, you don't know and neither do I.