Doesn't make sense to me. Maybe we have yet to learn the real reason.

Yeah, nothing adds up to him being the supposed "most popular president" in history. This is just one of the many things that don't add up.

Nobody says he's the most popular president in history.
Everything adds up.

Well, yes, they are saying he is, he was even in Times magazine. Even got more votes than Obama who was pretty darn popular during his time. So, yes you are wrong on that. Things do not add up, but will be happy to see in 2024 when everyone is dropping in mailed votes left and right, will you still say things do not add up when votes are up to the trillion?

Biden got 51% of the vote, and not one pro-Biden source has ever called him the most popular ever.
Get acquainted with reality before flinging your pathetic strawmen.
And there were no cases of more votes than registered voters.

ROFL yeah okay, whatever, guess strawman is the new discriminatory word you give us. Again will be some funny shit if Republicans use the same strategies Biden used to go up from loosing the entire day to winning at the very last minute with extended time. I mean where more votes comes from a city than actual number of people in that city. I want votes to hit the trillion mark, and as long as your party wins, you wont question one of them.

Well that didn't happen and you and I don't get an opinion to the contrary (the number of registered voters and the number of votes cast are publicly available information; the latter NEVER exceeded the former; to say otherwise is to prove you haven't done any research), so...

All I am saying is that is what I would like to see. Why cant you accept that. But let me ask you this, If Biden, this past election, had won with 1 trillion votes, will you not question it?

Nobody would accept an election with a trillion votes. There never has been such an election, nor will there be unless the population grows far, far larger than it is now - which won't be during our lifetimes.

And I was rooting for Trump at the time of the election. His attempts to overturn the election solely because he lost put me off MAGA.

Listen I voted no president, I actually have to write that into my vote. I am neither republican or democrat, but I have common sense and I can see when the math does not add up, and I do not give a flying fack about what people try to tell me, past election was as rigged as it can get.

The math does add up, and there's still no evidence that the election was rigged.

So good for ratings - bring him back!!!

Good one!

Only a moron wrapped inside an idiot would even pretend for one second this worthless, child groping, corrupt, lying, SENILE douchebag got that many votes at this late date!! The MAGA MOVEMENT IS LEGENDARY AND COMING BACK TO BITE U CLOWNS IN THE ASS

Only an idiot would scream fraud without evidence.

Still peddling that bullshit?

It's almost as though the election doesn't come down to corporate news ratings or something

Or like most people have been finally walking away in disgust, and the remaining fraction knows Biden and the rest of the gang for the creeps they are, and even they have lost the taste for the propaganda. I guess it's what you would call a strongly suggestive indicator.

No, CR, I wouldn't call it that.

I don't watch CNN for a second and I voted for Biden. Where does that fit into your calculations?

I'll say it again: nobody watches CNN more than you guys do, so that you can complain to us about what's on it.

But the election doesn't come down to news channels. It comes down to f**king votes. And you don't have to watch a news channel to vote.

The audits have proven Biden did not get that many votes. More audits on the way.

Sorry, Charlie. They haven't shown that. Not at all. Not anywhere.

If they every finish the AZ audit we will see where that goes.

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-arizona-election-2020-senate-elections-elections-c58813a20c3c5dcba5eecb00d908a782

"Arizona auditors backtrack, say no election data destroyed"

Ben Cotton, founder of a computer forensics firm working on the audit, told key senators that he had recovered all data. The revelation came a day after Maricopa County officials released a scathing letter saying the auditors couldn’t find the data because they didn’t know where to look.

Your quote doesn't prove anything you said. Please try again. If you do your research you'll find out they did delete the database, but the forensic team was able to reconstruct it.

You are mistaking suspicion with proof. Even if the voter registration database was deleted, that is circumstantial. It doesn't actually prove that voter fraud occurred. I would agree that it is very suspicious if there is no reasonable explanation, but of itself it is like saying a missing receipt is proof that something was stolen.

Missing voter registration databases would actually make confirmation in either direction difficult, so it could have just as easily been deleted by someone trying to make it look like there was fraud as someone who wanted to cover fraud up.

That also assumes that there are no other records for voter registration that could be used to rebuild the database.

If by research you mean a tweet by the twitter audit account, then sure. https://twitter.com/arizonaaudit?lang=en

They said the database was deleted based on the file being deleted in the MFT. That's pretty sound, however, from personal experience, applications can be odd and complex. There are often temporary databases that are created and deleted all the time. People do strange things like move databases around, increment them, etc. If you move a file from one drive to another the MFT on the origin drive would record a delete and the drive moved to would reflect a creating it.

Some databases are also created from other databases, so it is possible that as part of the power down process that database is deleted or moved to the system drive and then it is recreated/moved from somewhere else at power on. Since the forensic team identified that they recovered the data from a powered down state, the file could be missing but would have been present had they looked at it in the running state.

I'm not saying that is specifically what happened, but there are reasonable explanations.

Regardless, both the twitter account and the video above state that the databases were recovered.

https://www.azleg.gov/videoplayer/?eventID=2021051030
You can go here and go to 00:48:40

or use this direct link:
https://player.invintus.com?clientID=6361162879&eventID=2021051030&startStreamAt=2920

Nope. The database will allow them to find out what happened. The actual ballot audit count already showed Biden lost

Source on that ballot count thing?

What do you think happened?

On the contrary, audits have proven the certified results.

Fake news. Please do some research.

I have. Every audit has upheld the certified results of the 2020 US presidential election. This is not a matter of opinion; regardless of whether you "agree" with the results of the MANY audits, that is what they showed.

The AZ one just proved Biden lost.

A) The AZ "audit" is a blatant sham condemned by the state Republicans who ordered it.
B) The "audit" is still being carried out and the results have not been released or hinted at.
I strongly recommend laying off the fake news, buddy.

Nope, try following a neutral source. This one just reports the facts: https://nationalfile.com/breaking-significant-discrepancies-discovered-in-arizona-audit-ballots-off-up-to-17-5-likely-joe-biden-did-not-win/
It shows conclusively that unless something massive changes Biden lost AZ.

""Neutral source" my ass.
Blatant fake news.
The audit is literally run by partisan conspiracy theorists with no election experience. They damaged ballots with markers. They checked for bamboo just in case they came from China. They had a congressional candidate on the ballot take part (and banned the journalist who reported this from observing any more), along with someone who took part in the insurrection.
Plus Arizona has ALREADY been audited.
Yep, a genuine audit."

Wrong on all account. Its just reporting what the auditors said, so its not fake news. The audit is run by experienced IT professionals that have done audits of other systems. They didn't damage ballots with markers, they didn't check for bamboo. They checked for bamboo particles which would mean they came from an area outside the US (since we don't use bamboo in producing paper). The congressional candidate could take part as long as there are two others there checking each ballot. Completely legal. The person took part in the protest at the capital. They did not enter the building, so they didn't take part in the 'insurrection'.
Arizona was not audited. They did a quick recount of a tiny part of the ballots.

"Neutral source" my ass.
Blatant fake news.
The audit is literally run by partisan conspiracy theorists with no election experience. They damaged ballots with markers. They checked for bamboo just in case they came from China. They had a congressional candidate on the ballot take part (and banned the journalist who reported this from observing any more), along with someone who took part in the insurrection.
Plus Arizona has ALREADY been audited.
Yep, a genuine audit.

Ymmv, but you would make a poor tracker. Reasonable holistic inference may not be your strong suit.

Oh hey, did you Google California state law on shoplifting yet?

Already replied. Did you google the stores shutting down in anticipation? I'm guessing not.

Yeah, they'll pay you millions as a consultant for your astounding brilliance, since it's so far beyond theirs :::::-/

Anticipation. Hmmm. Interesting.

The change in legal status was NINE YEARS AGO. I think we've moved past the maybe stage.