How many rightists are anti-intetventionist? anyone?

All conservatives are.

Does that include when Communist China invades other countries?

such as?

Actually historically Republicans and Libertarians have been the primary antinterventionists. So we get derided by the left with terms like "isolationists" and "America Firsters".

But nice of you to pretend the left is going to get religion on this, it'd be about a century overdue.

Both parties are interventionist and bloody. There is no daylight between their foreign policies. Keep pretending Trump was different. He wasn't.

The TDS just never stops, does it?

There is total continuity in foreign policy from Bush II to Biden. I'm sorry it is hard you to accept that trump was not different from them. I'm not sure how viewing all the presidents as equally repugnant is trump related. You got snowed if you thought he represented any sort of deviation from US foreign policy. All he did was splash a bit of anti-interventionist rhetoric around. Rhetoric is not action. I think you are just a trump simp.

All you are doing is name calling. You haven't made a single point or even attempted to address any of the ones I raised. Keep patting yourself on the back though. clearly you are a geenis

you have not stated any facts or even made any arguments and are just personally attacking me.
I have made only coherent statements. Run away you scardey cat.

Neither have you.

China Joe's first airstrike was within 60 days.

I despise Biden. He is a warmonger and a fascist. Just like trump. They differ only very minor things like culture war issues and some issues which they both cynically employ only for tactical reasons.

On everything substantive, there is almost total agreement in their policy. The same is true of the GOP/Democrat consensus since at least 2000. I would argue it goes back farther, but ppl are generally more familiar with the last 2 decades of history so I will talk about those two.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/missles-chocolate-chocolate-cake-china-trump

please tell me how this is substantially different

Again. ur just name calling and cannot refute anything I said.

You're right. You cannot refute an incoherent, insane statement.

that is exactly my problem with you. You wont offer any evidence, any argument, or behave in a coherent fashion. I am speaking the language of fact and evidence and you are speaking the language of 4chan. They are fundamentally incompatible

Stand on the southern border and say that.

I smell a racist great "replacement" narrative. You are deliberately confusing immigrants with a military or covert invasion force. Immigrants do not come with tanks and rifles. They come fleeing the destabilization of their countries carried out by the US. We are doing it right now to a bunch of countries. They are literally the result of US foreign policy in Latin and South America.

Iranians

Iranians?

Yes, they have been apprehended on the border, several people on the terrorism watchlist have been apprehended at the border

And this
https://www.wnd.com/2021/04/2-men-terror-watch-list-arrested-illegally-crossing-southern-border/

For the longest time the narrative was the immigrants were coming here to have a better life, to escape poverty, to do the jobs Americans didn’t want to do. Every bit economic reasons and nothing else. That has not changed.

The thing you are missing is that poverty-especially in latin and south america-is the direct result of US foreign policy and exploitation.

The proverty is a direct result of their own country’s political and governmental failings

Venezuela is an excellent example.

Venezuela is poor because the US has had their economy under sanction and embargo since 2002. The US also just keeps stealing their shit. The US stole the US based portion of their state oil company. The Bank of England stole all their gold reserves on deposit.

Their poverty is a creation of the US.

I have a friend who was born in Venezuela and now lives here. Hugo Chavez’s communist philosophy has ruined the country.

Chavez used the VZ oil money to lift millions out of poverty, it was the US sanctions that wrecked the country. The reason that VZ didn't continue to thrive and grow was the sanctions. They can't import anything to fix their infrastructure. They can't import anything to build out other industries. They can't import most medicines. They can't sell their oil on the international market at a fair price or very easily. All of these restrictions were imposed on their country by the US.

Think of how the US would be doing if some bigger, stronger country had restricted our economy like that for 2 decades.

Chavez/Maduro administration is extremely corrupt and commits significant human rights abuses. The sanctions and embargoes were in response to that. The governments take over and control of many businesses has led to the ruin of the economy.
The US has provided hundreds of millions of dollars of aid to Venezuela.
If anybody has stolen the wealth of Venezuela, it is Chavez and Maduro and their cronies

US provided funds via the NED to overthrow the govt of venezuela, calling that aid is incredibly cynical while simultaneously preventing them from importing their own food and medicine. If the US would stop standing on their necks, they would be without any need for aid, not that the US aid provided is really aid.

The accusations of human rights abuses are a fart of the state dept, but even accepting that as a fact only for the sake of argument, consider the following. If guy was beating his wife and kids and you claimed to be concerned about the welfare of the family, I don't think any rational human being would consider it a sane response to prevent the family from buying food, going to the doctor, or making repairs to their home. That would only hurt the kids and the wife. Here is the thing tho: the venezuelan socialist govt aren't an abusive husband. They have continuously re-elected the PSUV at every election (less a fraudulent one engineered by the US in 2005) and will likely continue to do so. They have the right to elect their own govt and continue to pick PSUV because of how many people they lifted out of poverty and continue to feed and protect.

The reason the US is trying so hard to topple the VZ govt it the massive amount of oil reserved the country has. The US govt lied about Iraq and said it has WMDs and was develping nuclear weapons in order to drum up a casus belli (reason for military action) for the invasion of the country. The US was after the Iraqi oil just as it is after the VZ oil. The US is again lying about the actions of the govt it wants to topple. Please learn from history.

Juan Guaido literally went to CIA regime change school. Leopoldo Lopez, whose protege Guiado is, is a fascist oligarch. He organized mass terrorism and economic disruption / blockades (the guarimbas). They are incredibly racist and voluntad popular goons literally burned an afro-venezuelan man to death in one such instance of terrorism. Chavez and Maduro have the loyalty of their countrymen because they have protected black people (afrovenezuelans) and indigenous ppl from the racist terror campaigns of people like Guaido and Lopez. That kind of loyalty cannot be destroyed by the pathetic regime change efforts of the increasingly impotent US.

The US has done nothing but try and assassinate their democratically elected leaders and subvert their elections. If someone did that to the US we would be furious as well.

you are truly ignorant of the subject. it is quite pathetic

Mexican Reconquista movement

bruh what?

I’ve heard that firsthand from illegal immigrants from South of the border

heard what?

You might want to try an in-depth study into the origins, philosophies and teachings of La Raza

The Essay? The political party? The Chicano movement?
what exactly are you referring to?

Like I can explain it all to you here

I took a class on this subject and honestly I think all of the things you have said are just racist nonsense. People who were present in what became the US before it was have every right to live here and sadly there is zero chance of a military conquest displacing the US. The borders of the US are artificial and recent. They view the US as a heinous colonial monster and I agree with that viewpoint. The idea of being latino is a response to the racism of the US and the systems of racial oppression.

Remember, everyone else's problems are the fault of white people. Nobody else has any agency or control of their own circumstances, only white people.

You gonna cry zak? Take your ranch dressing elsewhere.