MEDIA VIRUS

Your username lies if you really think that.

we have just 15 cases, and when those go away- bam- the virus will just disappear! Or, after the election you wont hear anything about the virus, oh and your retirement fund will disappear- doomsday CULT45

:0)

It's called 'looking into the sunlight'

And yet, it still kills.

That means that for every 100 people who get it 1 dies. So if a million get it 10,000 die. Don't say it's not true, I'm using basic math and your own numbers.

You are an absolute fool. Covid has a 97% deathrate among young adults, you fool.

First off, COVID-19 has a 97% survival rate and based on your comments, you are most likely suggesting that we shouldn’t wear masks and let all of us get the virus, sounds like it wouldn’t be a big deal, right? Only 3% of people would die, right? Well if we did that we would be letting a bit over 250 million people die, that would be really really smart.

Isn't it worth trying to save all the lives we can?

Yes, but the lockdowns seem to be killing more than they're saving.

How so?

Look at the numbers man, Florida handled it better than any other state and has some of the lowest numbers

Trump claims he created the vaccine, he took the vaccine in January and didnt tell anyone- while telling his sheep it was safe to not wear masks- brilliant!

And Biden is telling his sheep that the virus was all him and to wear two masks- Even more brilliant!

yes, very Presidential of him- nice change from the previous shit-show.

How is what Biden is doing different from Trump?

Not a national or world wide embarrassment to start!

That has nothing to do with the virus

January 22: “We have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China. It’s going to be just fine.” February 2: “We pretty much shut it down coming in from China.” February 24: “The Coronavirus is very much under control in the USA… Stock Market starting to look very good to me!” February 25: “I think that's a problem that’s going to go away… They have studied it. They know very much. In fact, we’re very close to a vaccine.” February 26: “The 15 (cases in the US) within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero.” February 26: “We're going very substantially down, not up.” February 27: “One day it’s like a miracle, it will disappear.”
.... and yet you arent butt hurt over this pack of lies? The same dept that briefed Clumpy in January on the virus started to wear mask in January.

I totally believe that these weren't taken out of context by the media and also you should get some other non politically biased medical official to agree with the lies that you believe from Fauci

You left off the other six continents that are in on the fake virus

It's not fake, I had it. But, it's not such big news it has to consume the entire news program every night of the week for a year.

other ppl aren't so lucky.

I guess when something that was killing people by the hour across the US ( 500k+ dead) is news worthy. Id rather know about the House Wives of.. and what they are doing

Fake? 2 Million people would disagree with you.

Fake statistic.

It comes from the WHO. Do you have proof that says otherwise?

Yes.

What is it?

Go find out for yourself. I’m not going to spoon feed you.

There are none that are trustworthy in the slightest.
Meanwhile, WHO is literally tasked with counting those deaths. And you still don't trust them because why?

Think critically. Test what the world is saying to you. You are smart. You can put it together.

Okay Morpheus.
I am thinking...that you're incorrect.

Yeah, if I was in charge of YouTube, I would do the same.
Who should you trust:
The World Health Organization tasked with counting deaths, cases, causes, and the virus as a whole?
Or one guy with a YouTube video.

I would trust the guy who was getting his video torn down because it has information that they don't want to be pulblicied

Because it had false info and if it had correct info, it would lead to the viewers making false info and endangering the lives of other people.

Or.....It had information they didn't want people to know. Why do you think they only censor republicans for false information.

Maybe you should try trusting the Organization that dedicates their existence to solving Global Health Problems instead of the YouTuber that has 10 Minute Videos doing who knows what.
Besides, they only censor Republicans for False Information because it's false information.

So your telling me if I went onto twitter and posted that Joe Biden was raising gas prices at a huge rate and it was bad for America I wouldn't get censored for false information right?

Wtf, Joe lost by a landslide without the fraud, but at least you admit it was true and also admit that social media is censoring true information

Really? because it seems to me that instead of changing our minds about thing such as election fraud, it is only proving our claim. Or you can be the typical arrogant liberal and blindly repeat what you hear on the media

There was Election Fraud. And that's a fact. But even without that fraud, Biden would have won.

No, you wouldn't, because that isn't false information.

*publicized

Per incident of infection, the experimental vax is more deadly and dangerous than the virus.

I was wondering about that. Is it that true? Is the mortality rate higher for the vaccine higher than the virus?

no

No, in Pfizer’s (the biggest vaccine in the us currently) latest test, 6 out of 44,000 people died so under 0.1% of people taking the vaccine died, COVID however, has around a 97% survival rate, so a bit over 3% of people die from it, these statements made by conspiracy theorists and anti vacciners, are completely baseless and false, i suggest you do some research before you start believing these fake statements

I have never seen anyone except you say that 3% of covid patients die from it. All the reports I have seen have indicated less than 1% of people who contract this die from it. Can you please cite a reference to your 97% survival rate estimate?

The one in the middle

I understand. That is a global number. So, unlike in the US and, perhaps, some other wealthier western nations where testing was and is rampant, in areas where only those being admitted to hospitals are being counted, the calculated rate of death has to be far higher. But, since we did more testing and got results that indicated less than 1% of those infected died, the numbers we collected should count as a more accurate measure of the deadliness of this virus.