Nothing to see here please disperse

After a 24-vote margin in a state race triggered a recount in the city of Windham, officials found that vote scanners owned by Dominion Voting Systems shorted Republican candidates between 297 and 303 votes, or 6% of the total vote.

A Democratic candidate for state representative, Kristi St. Laurent, meanwhile, received 99 more votes than were actually cast for her.https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-hampshire-will-confiscate-voting-machines-that-shorted-republicans-by-6-of-votes

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/new-hampshire-will-confiscate-voting-machines-that-shorted-republicans-by-6-of-votes

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/online-vulnerable-experts-find-nearly-three-dozen-u-s-voting-n1112436

Security experts find voting machines connected to the Internet when they are not supposed to be.
So much for truth in election integrity.

Watchdog group Media Matters for America, however, is keenly aware of the site’s homophobia and transphobia.

“LifeSite News is one of the most virulently anti-LGBTQ outlets out there,” Brennan Suen, Media Matters’ LGBTQ program manager, tells The Advocate via email.

“LifeSite essentially serves as an extended communications shop for extreme anti-LGBTQ groups,” Suen continues. “Representatives from groups like Family Research Council, Liberty Counsel, and Alliance Defending Freedom regularly give LifeSite exclusive quotes, and the outlet reliably updates its audience on these groups’ work combating LGBTQ equality while adopting skewed, anti-LGBTQ framing for its content.”

You just never have a legitimate point do you?

The point, to help you out, is that the source is skewed, and is biased. Find an ap source, is my point. Anyone can point to a blog or rag that spews what they beleive it. Is there a local news source that is reporting that? Local news agencies are not biased...

...but you also think Facebook and twitter are 1st amendment platforms, dont you. I dont trust that you would understand the point, which is why you couldnt come to the conclusion on your own.

I am not disputing the articles as written, shit i didnt even read them. When I see three sources all pointed to the same website, the first thing I do is google WHO OWNS SUCH AMD SUCH WEBSITE. So, then I do research on exactly what kind of stories that site publishes...and when the site is only political, and does not have well rounded content, I dismiss as a site with an agenda, using propaganda.

Well I guess that's the difference between you and me. You need to vet the source, I would rather vet the info.

Oh so have vetted this info and have therefore confirmed it. Gotcha, I'll take your word for for it, it's all I have. Thank goodness those broken machines are getting yanked...SMH.

lol you think I care about the election or a mess up in some podunk town? I'm just saying a smart person uses counter information not smears of sources. You could have easily pointed out the countless failed lawsuits were no significant evidence has been found.

Oh you are one of those, too. A karen who really doesn't have a dog in the fight, but just likes to bitch and complain. Gotcha. Duly noted.

My dog is truth not your petty two tribe bs.

Are you having a stroke Karen. Karen karen are you ok?

I'm sorry. Are you too stupid to keep up?

You dont have to apologize to me Karen, I understand that this is your only achievement today...keyboard tough guy name calling, whew today was a success, you got to call someone stupid...

As if CNN, NBC, ABC, New York Times etc. aren’t biased?

One more local, unbiased media source;

https://www.eagletribune.com/news/new_hampshire/sotis-win-upheld-in-windham/article_39536164-6551-5e79-9d7c-a9fcf9c9ee07.html

The local reporting describes that voting machines did not properly count the ballots,

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/windham-democrat-raises-questions-about-nh-s-accuvote-machines/ar-BB1bjWvq

Local reporting in New Hampshire:
https://www.wmur.com/article/windham-new-hampshire-voting-machine-company-update-february-23-2021/35596719

What about the credibility of sources that do not report issues such as these?

Read my comment to numbskull

AZ: Maricopa County judge finds GOP Senate subpoenas of election materials are ‘legal and enforceable’......................................................https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/maricopa-county-court-arizona-republicans-election-trump

I’m sorry but, what does LGBQT have to do with an election for state representatives in New Hampshire?

It speaks to the bias of the source.

So, in other words, you can’t refute the story so you try to dismiss it due to the information source.

Here are some more sources. Take your pick:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/huge-development-hand-recount-finds-dominion-voting-machines-shorted-every-republican-windham-new-hampshire-300-votes/

https://drrichswier.com/2021/02/15/evidentiary-proof-voting-machines-removed-6-of-votes-from-each-windham-new-hampshire-gop-candidate-same-machines-used-in-85-of-towns/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/windham-democrat-raises-questions-about-nh-s-accuvote-machines/ar-BB1bjWvq

https://granitegrok.com/mg_manchester/2020/12/nhs-voting-machines-are-capable-of-redistributing-votes