Imgflip Logo Icon

As Lewis Carroll said, "Curiouser and curiouser!”

As Lewis Carroll said, "Curiouser and curiouser!” | IN JANUARY, MICHIGAN REMOVED 177,000 INELIGIBLE VOTERS FROM THE VOTING ROLLS. TRUMP LOST MICHIGAN BY 154,000 VOTES. THE DAY AFTER ELECTION DAY, A VOTE DUMP OF 149,772 WAS MADE. 98% OF THESE VOTES WERE FOR BIDEN. | image tagged in mich | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
917 views 52 upvotes Made by Perspicacity 5 years ago in politics
83 Comments
11 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Nothing to see here | NOTHING TO SEE HERE. MOVE ALONG | image tagged in nothing to see here | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
There really isn't.
6 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Afraid to look? If not why not investigate. Every other issue with this level of controversy has been investigated. Spent years investigating Trump for Russia collusion.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
THEY DID! They investigated, they audited, they recounted - SEVERAL TIMES!! They ALL found NO EVIDENCE OF WIDESPREAD FRAUD!
You won't hear that from right wing media, though.
4 ups, 5y,
2 replies
They never investigated they recounted where the difference was in the range to automatically trigger a recount for all but one case. That’s not an investigation. Why so resistant to investigate? Nothing happened right? No fear, investigate away right?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
https://jmshistorycorner.wordpress.com/2021/01/19/just-a-friendly-reminder/
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You can put all the lefty stories you want. It won’t change that there were election law changes and mass mailed ballots and other evidence that should be investigated. Period. What is the overreaching fear of investigation? Americans have had investigations for less controversial issue. Dems investigated Russian collusion for 4 years. Why all against investigations now?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Um, that's from Georgia's REPUBLICAN Secretary of State.
Yes, laws were changed because of the pandemic. So what?
"Fear of investigation" DOESN'T EXIST! The claims were investigated and debunked almost as soon as they were made, while idiot Republicans blocked their ears and screamed "Why are you afraid of investigations?!"
2 ups, 5y,
3 replies
There were no investigations just statements contradicting the accusations. That’s not a bi partisan congressional investigation.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You're describing your own accusations - someone just making up shit, and scores of idiots like yourself just believing it.
And if you want congressional investigation, shouldn't you, you know, provide evidence first?
2 ups, 5y
Plenty of evidence provided, got to investigate to prove it. Don’t need anyone to tell me what to think like you. I’ve seen lots of elections and none like this one. Election integrity was destroyed by Democrat leftists under the guise of Covid.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
All debunked.
2 ups, 5y
No their statements weren’t debunked yet, and never will be if there is no investigation. Which at this point is nearly moot as they have had plenty of time to cover their tracks. The only point is to get election integrity laws passed. Like Newsome wants every vote done in person and verified against registered voters for his recall. Why?
0 ups, 5y
That's what's done every election - check the electoral roll.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
More bullshit. You're listening too much to the right wing media.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.nvsos.gov/sos/home/showdocument%3Fid%3D9191&ved=2ahUKEwiNkcTp4PzuAhXJH7cAHYzvDN8QFjAEegQIBhAC&usg=AOvVaw0y2G_LK8EwdLj_Pojiti6e
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You’re a brainwashed drone who has mastered lib speak like the good little puppet you are.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
I'm a guy who researches verifiable facts. Unlike you.
2 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Oh you’re a fact checker? For who snipes? The fact checker that have been proven to be inaccurate and opinion based rather than fact based.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
They're only human.
1 up, 5y
What good is a fact checker that doesn’t get it right.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
They generally do get it right.
1 up, 5y
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/12/22/the-daily-mail-snopes-story-and-fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
It's been proven to be largely accurate (Snopes), and no, I'm not affiliated with anyone.
1 up, 5y
Largely, except a few times.
11 ups, 5y,
2 replies
0 ups, 5y
There clearly was idiotic democrat
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Which is true.
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
There absolutely was election fraud. The question is how much and was it coordinated.

https://news.yahoo.com/35-voter-fraud-cases-georgia-220500285.html

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/arizona-woman-investigated-for-voter-fraud-after-video-shows-her-offering-to-mail-people-s-ballots/ar-BB1akHlA
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Very little.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
And you know that for sure, how?
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
No evidence of widespread fraud.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
If you refuse to look for it, you will never find it.

There have not been any meaningful investigations that I know of into it. Just people stating that there was no fraud or election commissioners saying they did nothing wrong when irregularities are pointed out. ie. blocking poll watchers from observing counting, removing poll watchers completely, not performing signature verification, explaining late-night delivery of ballots, running stacks of ballots multiple times through the machines, etc.,

No deep forensic audits have been conducted, yet. New Hampshire has said they are going to do one after they did a hand recount in one county and found the machines gave 8% of the Republican vote to the Democrats. Arizona is still fighting a county commission about doing one.

Georgia did a re-count where they ran the same ballots through the same machines again. They never checked if the machine counts were accurate. They never addressed the questions on signature verification, ineligible voters, or the machines being connected to the internet.

So far no court case filed has gone to trial or had evidence presented, all the court cases were thrown out on some technicality, including the SCOTUS case. ie. lack of standing, moot point after the election, too early to bring the case, too late to try the case, or saying it would not change the results.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Fake news. You've been only listening to your echo chamber again.
The claims have been investigated - and proven to be nonsense.
Many audits have been carried out - no fraud.
Many recounts have been carried out - no fraud.
There were no cases of poll watchers being blocked. The witnesses Trump's team presented admitted as such.
There were no cases of running stacks of ballots through machines multiple times.
No evidence for your 8% claim.
HAND recounts have been done multiple times and confirmed the machine count each time.
There were almost no cases of "ineligible voters".
And it's an ABSOLUTE FACT OF REALITY that the courts DID hear Trump's fraud cases and threw them out for lack of evidence. Go look up the cases instead of just repeating right wing lies.
2 ups, 5y,
3 replies
You state "There were no cases of poll watchers being blocked"

Here is the site in Detroit where they were counting the ballots. The worker is putting up cardboard so the poll watchers can't see what is going on.

"HAND recounts have been done multiple times and confirmed the machine count each time."

Here is an article about the machines in one NH county miscounting votes and moving votes to Democrats. The NH Senate is now going to do a complete forensic audit to find out why?

https://en-volve.com/2021/02/11/bombshell-new-evidence-of-election-fraud-in-nh-as-dominion-machines-found-to-have-taken-300-votes-off-every-republican-candidate/

Here is an article about a county in Mich. where the voting machine flipped 6,000 votes from Rep. to Dem.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gop-demands-michigan-vote-count-checks-after-machine-glitch-flips-county-to-trump/ar-BB1aM1Be

"There were almost no cases of "ineligible voters".

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/michigan-removed-177000-voters-voter-rolls-january-certifying-biden-won-michigan-154000-votes-november/?utm_source=Gab&utm_medium=PostSideSharingButtons&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

We don't know if any of these "ineligible voters" voted in the last election.
1 up, 5y
The NH machines shorted both Democrats and Republicans, and is believed to be a glitch.
Also, this was in the state election, not the federal or presidential one.
https://www.unionleader.com/news/politics/statehouse_dome/state-house-dome-recounts-find-votes-not-fraud-in-nh/article_6f23ca8d-c5a3-59ae-b783-4f751f164244.html
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The full story on your Detroit photo:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/6195038002
0 ups, 5y
So we don't allow poll watchers to see what is going on because the people counting felt "intimidated" having people making sure they do their job as the law states.

Of course, the story states that the Detroit City Clerk said they did nothing wrong, and the Director of Elections denied allegations that either party was treated unfairly and said he was "extremely confident" Detroit would "come through with a nice clean report"

so yeah, I guess it is fine.
0 ups, 5y
No, there were literally hundreds of poll watchers already there, and many more trying to enter. The limit is meant to be 134.
Try not to make yourself look stupid.
9 ups, 5y
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
So that's the whole Cheshire Cat thing
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
"Curiouser and curiouser"
4 ups, 5y
1 8 6 5
1 up, 5y
Seal of Approval - Upvoted!
1 up, 5y
Idiotic democrat you hate America you know if you don't have a job try finding one with all the aliens coming in the U.S now
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
I did the math. Even with Michigan, Trump still would have lost and Biden still would have won.
5 ups, 5y,
2 replies
You are correct, but what about the irregularities in Penn., Georiga, Arizona, and Nevada? Don't these need to be investigated.

Arizona legislature is still trying to force a forensic audit of the machines. Georgia just found 35 cases of criminal election fraud, and the head of the election dept just resigned. Several Penn. cases are still in the courts.
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Georgia is the only one suspicious. But Penn, Arizona and Nevada were all Blue States for certain.
And even if that, Biden still would have won. Although Trump most likely would have gotten Georgia, Biden would have gotten the Victory with Penn first.
5 ups, 5y,
3 replies
Arizona has voted Red in 3 of the last 4 Presidential elections.

My question is, why are the Arizona commissioners in Maricopa county fighting so hard NOT to have an independent forensic audit done of their voting machines? They have even ignored a subpoena from the State Legislature.

In each of these five states, Trump lost the state because of only one county, and strangely those counties all had an exceptionally higher turnout rate than the rest of the state.

Trump even did better than last time in Calif. and NY. Why did the republicans gain house seats in every state, but Trump still lost.

How did Biden get more votes than Obama, yet only won 16% of the counties nationwide? Less than the number Obama won. He won the fewest counties of ANY winner, yet he got more votes than any winner in history.

None of this proves election fraud, but it is "Curiouser and curiouser"
0 ups, 5y
Maybe it's because they saw how shitty Trump was not as a President but as a Leader in General and decided to vote Biden.
0 ups, 5y
Past election results do not guarantee future election outcome.

There's a difference between not having an audit done, and rejecting the audit as insufficient as the Arizona GOP lawmakers have done.

I'm not sure which counties you're referring to, not that it matters since it is the votes in the state as a whole, not a single county, that determine the winners in each race. Also, voter turnout increased because of the expansion of mail-in ballots, and it was predicted by many election experts and the media WELL before the election that the mail-in ballots would tend to favor Biden over Trump. That's the real reason the Republicans fought against expanding mail-in ballots to everyone, plus Trump's own tweets about mail-in ballots not being trustworthy ultimately bit him in the ass.

One reason I can think of for Republicans winning House seats is that not as many people voted in the downballot races as the presidential race. Another reason might be because the state legislatures (the ones the GOP controlled) gerrymandered the districts to manipulate the vote. Anyway, Republicans didn't gain House seats in every state. They flipped House seats in 10 states, but Democrats managed to flip seats in North Carolina and Georgia. What I want to know is (I've asked this numerous times and NEVER gotten an answer), if the Democrats were capable and willing to rig the presidential election, why would they give up so many House seats and leave the Senate so close to a 50-50 split?

Maybe the increased voter turnout helped more Democrats vote. Maybe so many more people had had it with Trump and voted him out. Whatever the reason, it happened and the number of counties doesn't determine the winner, the number of votes does.

And for once you're right, none of these things proves election fraud, but neither do they seem that curious under scrutiny.
0 ups, 5y
Also, where's the fifth state?
0 ups, 5y
They didn't *just* find 35 cases, many of those cases go back to before 2020.
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • Chelsea Cat logo
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    IN JANUARY, MICHIGAN REMOVED 177,000 INELIGIBLE VOTERS FROM THE VOTING ROLLS. TRUMP LOST MICHIGAN BY 154,000 VOTES. THE DAY AFTER ELECTION DAY, A VOTE DUMP OF 149,772 WAS MADE. 98% OF THESE VOTES WERE FOR BIDEN.