papers

Assuming I haven’t already.

Can't reply there.

"You're one step away from eugenics."

I'm just curious. Do you believe facts are facts regardless of what we'd like them to be? Or do we change reality by what we want? Everything I said there is backed up by enormous amounts of scientific research, you self-righteous asshole.

And when those facts have something to do with the conversation, I’ll upvote them if you use them to make a good point.

Your point was that black people was inferior.

Hardly worthy of an upvote, let alone 20.

I notice you failed to answer my question: Do you believe facts are facts regardless of what we'd like them to be?

What you described was not a fact. It was a racist viewpoint of a fact. Yes, facts are facts but it you’re going to resort to rationalizing your hatred or mistreatment of a group of people based on facts, especially an incomplete fact such as when you said:

“Because they have a lower IQ and a higher genetic predisposition to anti-social violence including the aggressive variant of the MAOA “warrior” gene.”

Is incorrect. Just because a higher percentage of black people may have this gene than a percentage of white people doesn’t mean every black person who protested against police brutality all have it. Or that they all have lower IQ. But you failed to make that distinction in regards to your rather poor stance that the Trump riots were somehow acceptable while the BLM protests were not.

When you reject one disenfranchisement and rationalize the other by generalizing a genetic fact, then you are rationalizing the mistreatment of people based on their race. A slippery slope to supremacism.

In this country, people are innocent until proven guilty regardless of their race. When a cop kills an unarmed citizen, they lose that right. End of story. And when it is shown time and time again, regardless of the statistics, those statistics aren’t going to keep people from being scared of being next. And when you tell that group of people that they should obey the law and law enforcement even if it is rare that they may end up dead when they are unarmed, then why should they believe such statistics?

You can only rationalize with people who are afraid to be killed by law enforcement for so long before they begin to doubt the sincerity. Especially when that fear is legitimized and reinforced by video evidence time and time again. This has never been about protecting criminals. It’s about protecting due process. Which every civilian should have. No unarmed civilian should die while in police custody.

Answer the question. Don’t waffle on for paragraphs. Don’t try to put words in my mouth. Answer the question, you dishonest, self-righteous asshole: “Do you believe facts are facts regardless of what we'd like them to be?”

Yes, I do think facts are facts. What an absurd question. I have not questioned any facts at all. What I have said is that your generalized use of a fact is a slippery slope to supremacism, and claimed you were one step away from eugenics.

As I've already said:

Just because a higher percentage of black people may have this gene than a percentage of white people doesn’t mean every black person who protested against police brutality all have it. Or that they all have lower IQ. But you failed to make that distinction in regards to your rather poor stance that the Trump riots were somehow acceptable while the BLM protests were not.

Stop putting words in my mouth, you self-righteous slime. I said what I said. I did not say anything you’re attributing to me.

I have put no words into your mouth.

You did say:

“Over and over, I’ve heard claims of “systemic racism.” Over and over, when investigated, the facts show that black people get treated differently because they BEHAVE differently.”

“Because they have a lower IQ and a higher genetic predisposition to anti-social violence including the aggressive variant of the MAOA “warrior” gene.”

It is not putting words into your mouth. It is a fact that you said this on this meme here.

imgflip.com/i/4t7g5n

“When a cop kills an unarmed citizen, they lose that right.”

What about if that “unarmed citizen” just tried to grab the cop’s gun and is actively charging at him to assault him again, like Michael Brown?

You are either not very bright and a sucker for people selling a hate-whitey narrative or are a willing participant yourself. All of the actual facts are against you, if you’d open your eyes just a bit, but you just shill, shill, shill that hate whitey story.

I already covered Michael Brown here.

imgflip.com/i/4t55y4?nerp=1610393698#com8428577

But I'm not selling a hate-whitey narrative. I'm saying cops shouldn't kill unarmed civilians regardless of their skin color. You're the one who continues to pervert my argument into some kind of racist rhetoric.

I suggest you keep to attacking the argument rather than the person making the argument.

When I said:

"Yes, facts are facts but it you’re going to resort to rationalizing your hatred or mistreatment of a group of people based on facts"

I'm referring to:

"No unarmed civilian should die while in police custody."

What if, before in police custody, that person took a lethal overdose of fentanyl?

Then a police officer shouldn’t kneel on their neck.

Number of times I've physically assaulted a black person in my whole life: 0.
Number of times I've suffered minor physical assault from a black person for no reason: 2.

But yes, please tell me how I'm "mistreating" them, you arrogant asshole.

I didn't say you were.

But I didn’t. I merely stated that you were one step closer to eugenics.

Do try to keep up.

The only one screeching about racism is you.

If what I say is true, does the "direction" matter? Are we not supposed to notice true things if they might lead to bad things?

You can compare apples to oranges all you like. But an apple is still an apple and orange is still an orange. And before you misconstrued my analogy as somehow racist to white people; I am referring to the situation not the color of skin. It seems to me that race shouldn’t factor into it at all. This is why I don’t bother to make the distinction that police shouldn’t kill unarmed black people. I just say police shouldn’t kill anyone who is unarmed.

Did you ever lift your voice in protest for Daniel Shaver?

I have never lifted my voice in protest for anyone specifically. So, it is irrelevant against my viewpoint that police shouldn't kill anyone who is unarmed.

"I just say police shouldn’t kill anyone who is unarmed."

Cool. Someone who just tried to grab your gun is not unarmed. He has clear violent intent and needs to be stopped (Michael Brown). Someone who physically assaulted you, stole your tazer and fired it at you is not unarmed (Rayshard Brooks). Someone you got called on for violating a restraining order who is armed with a knife going to a vehicle with children in it is not unarmed (Jacob Blake).

This narrative of these poor innocent black folks who dindu nobody no harm is bullshit.

Answer me this, you arrogant asshole, why did Black Lies Matter protest for Ricardo Munoz? Why? Why was anyone upset that a knife-wielding lunatic screaming and charging at a cop was shot? That's insane.

I didn't say they didn't do anyone harm. That is for a court of law to decide. Not a cop who thinks they can be judge, jury, and executioner.

Those circumstances could've ended with Brown, Brooks, and Blake apprehended. Instead, it resulted into their deaths. Rather than a court of law determining if Brown, Brooks, and Blake did their crime; is no longer relevant because they are dead. Now, the court has to determine if the police had the right to shoot the suspect; who can never be named a criminal for any action that took place that resulted in his death because they are dead.

I have said, many times, that I often disagree with BLM and their methods. That doesn't mean I'm going to pretend I don't know why they protest individuals. Sometimes they get it wrong. That doesn't mean they're always wrong nor does it delegitimize their protest that cops shouldn't shoot or kill unarmed civilians.

If I catch myself not upvoting you again, I’ll upvote 20 of your memes. ;)

Thanks, but there's no need. Besides, mine are (un)well aged and points don't add for those older than two months.

I always upvote yours I see, even if I don't comment.

Yep. Sadly.

True.

The left: follows Nazi protocol to the letter
The right: meet the new target of the new Nazis.

have you seen all the white supremacists at trump rallies? you are neo nazis.

That guy right there was at the damn AntiFA protests you unkempt mud garden.

he is literally a long term white supremacist with a white supremacist tattoo- named Jason Agnelli.

Ain't no white supremacist folks showed to anything Trump related all year, yet That guy shoes up at BLM and AntiFA protests & didn't get the crap kicked out of him??

I guarantee you any why supremacist at a BLM movement , would have been curb stomped to death.

Use your brain. That isn't a Trump Supporter.

But - the main stream media said he was! The fact checkers they own and pander their narrative to - to back their narrative - they said he was! You're a sheep. Brainless and eager to be led by anyone with a stick in a field.

He is an Anti BLM protester maybe that's why ever think of that?
More like you are a crazy conspiracy theorist! What do you believe in the Illuminati too?

Shhhhhhhh - they can hear us.

🤫

He was there doing the same protesting... AntiFA and BLM protested in joint efforts. Sorry rioted and looted and destroyed people livelihood. There weren't a bunch of AntiFA and BLM clashes bc they were on the same team.

Dude for the last time. The dude was Anti BLM and a Trump supporter. FBI says there is no evidence of BLM and Antifa being involved in that riot. You don’t sound informed. You just sound like a crazy conspiracy theorist.

Ah yes... The infamous FBI that pursued a fake Russian allegation story for 4 years & then says the election of 2020 was most Securest election ever.... THAT FBI.

Bearded dude in tan - literally has the AntiFA logo tattoo on his hand.

NAILED IT

I don't see any Nazi symbols there. Do you need to get your eyes checked? Or possibly your brain? Are you suffering from paranoid hallucinations?

you might want to check the origin of that tattoo - its neo-nazi aryan bullshit.