Imgflip Logo Icon

America Is Teetering on a Precipice

America Is Teetering on a Precipice | IF ENOUGH SENATORS CHALLENGE  
ELECTION RESULTS, 
TRUMP WINS. If there aren't sufficient  
Electoral College votes; to hand victory to one candidate, The Constitution Determines 
Who Picks the Winner:; Fifty members from the newly seated 
House of Representatives decide. The overwhelming evidence of 

election fraud demands we choose; Country Over Partisan Politics; AND TAKE A STAND FOR 
FREE & FAIR ELECTIONS! | image tagged in politics,donald trump,freedom,liberty,good vs evil,america | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,172 views 64 upvotes Made by vBackman 3 years ago in politics
152 Comments
[deleted]
9 ups, 3y,
2 replies
6 ups, 3y,
2 replies
I agree again. There are too many RINO Republicans in power right now.
4 ups, 3y,
1 reply
The only RINOs are the Trump Cult members and Trump himself.
4 ups, 3y,
1 reply
RINO = anyone who goes against the narrative of what a Republican should be: willing to go along with everything the Democrats want.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Time to break to an America First party.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Nah, just take over the republican establishment. Replace them all.
0 ups, 3y
Or no parties at all. I would love that, so people don't vote based on party affiliation and rather the candidates values and propositions.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
There are too many people who realise that there wasn't fraud.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
The fraud is not only real. Its been investigated and proven in the state legislature investigations. They proved at a bare minimum that swing states did not follow election laws and the constitution.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
😂😂😂😂😂
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
laugh all you want. Just wait and see what happens on the 6th and 20th.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
You'll be crying.
Actually no, you'll be screaming about how unfair and rigged the system is, which is the next best thing.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No, I'll be cleaning my guns and counting my ammo.
0 ups, 3y
XD
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
if enought challenges he will. We will have to wait to find out.
[deleted]
12 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Our free and fair elections said that Biden won. So the Senate really isn't interested in your nonsense. Trump is done, it is over.
8 ups, 3y,
3 replies
How in the world can you say that when there has been so much evidence of fraud, anti? It just seems that you do not care about America, our principles, our morals, or our history. We are not a Socialist/radical country, at least not until liberalism made people lose their minds.
[deleted]
12 ups, 3y,
4 replies
The courts were pretty clear that there wasn't enough evidence to work with. "So much evidence" doesn't lead to a big fat nothing 60 different times across like five different states. Shouldn't you have had ONE court case that went somewhere?

So that's why I keep saying: your "evidence" was a bunch of garbage. Biden won. He won two months ago. Nobody has proven otherwise.
9 ups, 3y,
3 replies
Just look at how Dems have comported themselves for four years; if not for blind partisanship, you all would have been committed (guilty until proven innocent, believe the women, impeach a POTUS over a phone call yet VIDEO EVIDENCE of Quid Pro Joe means nothing, ETC.). Sadly, the truth is that there is NO amount of evidence that Democrats will accept.
[deleted]
10 ups, 3y,
1 reply
There doesn't have to be. There just has to be enough evidence that a judge would accept. And after 60 of them, there hasn't been.
6 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Nope, again most were thrown out for non-evidentiary reasons. Please stop with the fake news.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Read the rulings. There was no evidence.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No, they refused to see the evidence and refused to subpoena the ballots. There's a massive difference.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Lying again.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
lol no. All you got is insults. You have failed to refute the evidence presented.
1 up, 3y
What evidence?
1 up, 3y
Yeah, WI Supreme court basically said, "Yes Mr. President, there are irregularities, BUUUUUUUT, you're too late. Sorry. (Not sorry).
6 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Lady Justice was blind, and she made her courtroom decision many times over.
6 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Nope, the judges threw them out for non-evidentiary reasons.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
As in, THERE WASN'T COMPELLING EVIDENCE. Some of the greatest hits:
"a walking legal contradiction."
“They want this court to substitute its judgment for that of 2.5 million Georgia voters who voted for Joe Biden, and this I am unwilling to do.”
"[the Pennsylvania legal claim is] Frankenstein’s Monster ... haphazardly stitched together"
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Your greatest hits are from the judges statements, which mean nothing. What matters is the actual reason they were dismissed. In most of the cases they were for non-evidentiary reasons.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
The point is that dozens of judges from different states all agreed that the cases don't hold legal merit. If there were a scrap of compelling evidence or legal argument, at least one of the judges would have allowed it to go to trial.
1 up, 3y
No they agreed that they didn't meet procedural reasons. Like Texas not having standing to sue another state.
1 up, 3y
Still no evidence.
5 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Our courts were pretty clear in that they didn't want to get involved. Most of the cases were thrown out for non-evidentiary reasons. You know this. You've been shown this over and over, yet you refuse to stop spreading fake news.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Because the courts are corrupt.
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Are corrupt because trump filled them with conservative judges.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
How are they corrupt? If they rejected the cases, then they aren't biased toward him. That argument was pathetic.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
They are corrupt as in they are cowards and won't do their jobs.
0 ups, 3y
Naw man. I know that. Carcrasher thinks the courts were on Trump's side and corrupt that way.
2 ups, 3y,
2 replies
Our elections were so free and fair that there are about 200,000 more votes than registered voters in PA.

Also, no evidence can be presented if the court won't hear the case.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Yeah, probably because you keep using the wrong numbers like that one. Judges know how many actual registered voters there are.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Then why don't they hear the cases?
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
They did. 60 times. They ruled that the cases were garbage.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
No they denied the cases. No evidence can be presented if there is no time in court.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
There most certainly was time in court - they had to present their case to a judge to ask for their lawsuits to move forward. The judges ruled that the case did not meet minimum legal standards and was therefore dismissed.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
Boy, that was dumb. So they didn't throw it out based on lack of evidence then?
[deleted]
1 up, 3y
Yes! They did! Read the rulings, the evidence was not to minimum legal standard so the case was thrown out!
1 up, 3y
FALSE.
0 ups, 3y,
1 reply
Oh, and the Trump team hacked the Dominion machines in real time during a Georgia hearing. sO fReE aNd FaIr! NoThInG tO sEe HeRe!
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
3 replies
I just hacked your computer.

I mean, if you're just going to believe a guy who literally provided NO EVIDENCE to verify that he HAD hacked the dominion machine, I may as well just tell you, I've got full access to your computer and your phone and your tablet why not.
0 ups, 3y,
3 replies
The committee proceeded to UNANIMOUSLY pass a motion the audit all the absentee votes in a county.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y,
1 reply
OK. So they're demanding an emergency audit. Will they get it, will it matter, and will it make a difference on Wednesday?

Spoiler: maybe, no, and no.
1 up, 3y,
1 reply
You can't tell me with a straight face that it won't matter. Wait for the audit, then come to conclusions so you don't look like a fool afterward.
[deleted]
2 ups, 3y
I've been telling you with a straight face that everything you've been saying for the past two months is wrong!
0 ups, 3y
My bad. Fulton County.
0 ups, 3y
In Georgia. I'll look it up.
0 ups, 3y
https://youtu.be/I7mx4VZe_C0
0 ups, 3y
https://youtu.be/tPmw0PnrvBM
3 ups, 3y
There’s more evidence to claim Mitch McConnell cheated or nefarious actors did so on his behalf.

Why isn’t anyone concerned with that? Or the fact Trump lost while republicans won in many areas?

Maybe people just dislike Trump. Including republicans. And they simply voted for Biden while also voting for GOP Congress candidates. Why is this hard to accept? Trump lost the popular vote in 2016. He has NEVER had a greater than 49% approval rate. It’s pretty simple. More people dislike Trump than Biden. Or....more people simply don’t want trump as president so they voted for the other option.
1 up, 3y
What "so much evidence"? The evidence you failed to present in court?
Show More Comments
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • paste:image.png
  • image.png
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    IF ENOUGH SENATORS CHALLENGE ELECTION RESULTS, TRUMP WINS. If there aren't sufficient Electoral College votes; to hand victory to one candidate, The Constitution Determines Who Picks the Winner:; Fifty members from the newly seated House of Representatives decide. The overwhelming evidence of election fraud demands we choose; Country Over Partisan Politics; AND TAKE A STAND FOR FREE & FAIR ELECTIONS!