Imgflip Logo Icon

As a child, John Roberts was found of screaming, "You're not the boss of MEEEEEEEEE!"

As a child, John Roberts was found of screaming, "You're not the boss of MEEEEEEEEE!" | "Chief Justice Roberts, we have overwhelming evidence that illegal actions distorted the election outcome, we seek legal remedy for the 74 million legal voters who were disenfranchised."; "This Court refuses to overturn the results of an election."; "Your Honor, how is corrupting a legal election and manipulating the actual results not overturning the results of an election?" | image tagged in u s supreme court | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
362 views 20 upvotes Made by sevenheart 5 years ago in politics
32 Comments
3 ups, 5y,
2 replies
Because none of it's true?????
5 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The purpose of the judicial system is to allow both sides to bring forth evidence seeking what is true. The courts have stymied this process in every attempt to bring forth the truth.
3 ups, 5y
It has.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
You don't know what truth is. Why are you even commenting?
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Because courts have emphatically rejected all of Trump's lawsuits?
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Of course. Don't you get the point of this meme? The courts who are supposed to uphold the law have not upheld the law. To hell with 74 million Americans who elected Trump, we mustn't overturn the "election" even if there were fake ballots, illegal procedures and other violations of law.
Oh that's right. You don't know what truth is.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
The only reason why you don't think the courts upheld the law is only because they produced a result that didn't benefit Trump, not because they were actually wrong.
4 ups, 5y,
1 reply
No, its because they didn't even review the cases, they were all dismissed for non-evidentiary reasons.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Is it my fault that all the lawsuits filed by Trump and his allies are absolute dogshit? Plus, you have to be extraordinarily ignorant if you unironically believe that the cases rejected had even a morsel of merit to them. Every single case brought up for a review has been summarily dismissed. The ones rejected wouldn't have been any different.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Yeah, no. Each case presents actual evidence of fraud and have been dismissed for non-evidentiary reasons, mostly procedural ones. The reason is the judicial branch doesn't want to get into the business of settling elections for the executive branch.
1 up, 5y
Yeah, no. There are plenty of cases in which the judge reveals the evidence and determines the evidence to be BS. Go to democracy docket, then click on "states" and then on "post-election." Then you arrive at a dashboard where you then click on multiple states with a bunch of Trump lawsuits and the judges' dismissal. Stop pretending that every case was thrown out for non-evidentiary reasons and stop pretending that those cases had merit because I guarantee you they don't.
3 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Oh you sound so butt hurt, do you really want to know what I said about you 60 years ago? We weren't politically correct back then, just honest.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
"Oh you sound so butt hurt, do you really want to know what I said about you 60 years ago?"

projection

"We weren't politically correct back then, just honest."

aight. i love honesty, and i love political incorrectness. let's be frank here; unrelated, but i think we're overcompensating for 9/11.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Oh it all goes back to 9/11 . How did you get soooooooooooooooo very wery smarty warty? Oh that's right your not smart (play along here). Everything you write on every meme I see you comment on is spot on idiot. Thanks for bumping up my point score on imgflip with your insipid and oh so vapid snark.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
man oh man i must've struck a nerve.

"Everything you write on every meme I see you comment on is spot on idiot."

that description goes to virtually every meme on m/politics

"Thanks for bumping up my point score on imgflip with your insipid and oh so vapid snark"

like i care about point score. also you're welcome
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
No you didn't strike a nerve. Don't flatter yourself. What do you stand for? I just want to know what you believe.
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
one thing i'll say is that i stand for the united states getting out of foreign wars, which is why i brought up 9/11 & overcompensation. the reason i use the snark is because i often can bring more to the table than the entirety of imgflip m/politics can, depending on how pointless the topic is.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
You forgot to mention you are full of yourself. Like you, I'm glad Trump tried to get us out of the endless war bs that makes politicians wealthy and feeds the military industrial complex. I don't see Biden doing anything like that.
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
Ah yes, the famous anti-war president Donald Trump, who's so famous for his principled anti-war stance that he pardoned literal war criminals. Ah yes, the famous anti-war president who literally just threatened military action in Iran, and who's massively increased drone strikes in his presidency while removing drone accountability programs. Real brilliant take you got there.
2 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Well you got the pussy president you wanted in Joe Biden. Who can forget Obama's mobile red line in the sand and $150 billion payments to terrorists to make them play nice. When terrorists leaders get sliced diced and julienned with a ginsu missile they really settle down. at least Joe will let them have their fun! Won't the world be a wonderful place when thug regimes regain control!!!
0 ups, 5y
Iraq in 2017 - which he took credit for
Syria
Yemen
Iran for a whole two days
NK almost but he caved and stopped short of withdrawing from the DMZ because he fell in love.

No war at all from the perspective of those people because they're dead.

And Obama gave no $150 billion to any terrorists.
Perhaps you're thinking of Reagan or towards the many 'philanthrapic' activies of Israel?
1 up, 5y,
2 replies
Threaten and execute are two different things, except in the liberal mind, where talking is the same as doing. Real brilliant take there. Don't worry, school gets much better for you after kindergarten. You're what 24? 27? 35? It should only take you another 20 years to get to first grade.
1 up, 5y
If you tout yourself as an anti-war president, threatening war vs actually doing it both undermine that label. And he's literally already done acts of war against Iran. Don't you remember when he placed sanctions on Iran, many of which were illegal under international law? Don't you remember when he killed the top Iranian general? If the roles were reversed, America would already be "freedoming" away.
0 ups, 5y
"Threaten and execute are two different things"

one step in that direction is one step too far
1 up, 5y,
3 replies
"You forgot to mention you are full of yourself"

pretty big words coming from a person on imgflip m/politics

"Like you, I'm glad Trump tried to get us out of the endless war bs that makes politicians wealthy and feeds the military industrial complex"

i wish he actually did that lol. he gave billions to the military industrial compex
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
Thanks for written proof that you are ignorant of the facts. (Trump is the first President in modern times to only get us out of wars and not start any new ones- or police actions as they like to say to subvert Congressional action). Why do you hate the truth?
And if this site is sooooooo below your superior lying intellect and dignity, why are you wasting your time here? I'm sure the liberal blog sites can't wait to hear your pithy wisdom and voluminous yet vacuous insights.
1 up, 5y
"Thanks for written proof that you are ignorant of the facts"

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/21/trump-signs-738-billion-defense-bill.html
reuters.com/article/us-usa-saudi-arms/defying-congress-trump-sets-8-billion-plus-in-weapons-sales-to-saudi-arabia-uae-idUSKCN1SU25R

this was a year ago. i'm very sorry. one weapon sold to the

"Trump is the first President in modern times to only get us out of wars and not start any new ones"

he nearly got us into war with iran twice, and we're still in afghanistan

"Why do you hate the truth?"

because "truth" is a buzzword for m/politics.

"I'm sure the liberal blog sites can't wait to hear your pithy wisdom and voluminous yet vacuous insights"

leftists & liberals hate me too
1 up, 5y,
1 reply
I know you are the same as BOBArtthebungwellian but this is just for you too
Well you got the pussy president you wanted in Joe Biden. Who can forget Obama's mobile red line in the sand and $150 billion payments to terrorists to make them play nice. When terrorists leaders get sliced diced and julienned with a ginsu missile they really settle down. at least Joe will let them have their fun! Won't the world be a wonderful place when thug regimes regain control!!!
0 ups, 5y
"I know you are the same as BOBArtthebungwellian"

eyyy people who can't debate for a dime see alts everywhere

"Who can forget Obama's mobile red line in the sand and $150 billion payments to terrorists to make them play nice"

your whole argument relies on me liking obama & biden even though a 2-second glance at my memes can prove otherwise
0 ups, 5y,
1 reply
Asked you what you stand for and you give nothing burger answers. You are a critic in the truest sense of the word, criticize anything and everything, but contribute anything useful? Not likely in this lifetime.
0 ups, 5y
"Asked you what you stand for and you give nothing burger answers"

i'm anti-war, anti-hypocrisy, and anti-government secrets. that should be plenty :)

"You are a critic in the truest sense of the word, criticize anything and everything, but contribute anything useful?"

i'm gonna let my real purpose on this site be a secret. someday someone shall figure it out
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
    "Chief Justice Roberts, we have overwhelming evidence that illegal actions distorted the election outcome, we seek legal remedy for the 74 million legal voters who were disenfranchised."; "This Court refuses to overturn the results of an election."; "Your Honor, how is corrupting a legal election and manipulating the actual results not overturning the results of an election?"