Senate Hearing

Judge Starr told the committee that most of the election fraud cases that have been dismissed from the courts have only been denied based on procedural issues rather than based on their merits. In other words, the media is wrong when it states that the courts found no fraud in the election. Starr and Sen. Rand Paul said it's more about the courts being reluctant to get involved in election results.

Starr further pointed to "flagrant" violations in Pennsylvania, for example, arguing "there was a clear violation of the law."

"The Constitution is very clear that it is the prerogative of the state legislatures to determine what these (election) rules and laws are. And that was, I must say, flagrantly violated in Pennsylvania and perhaps elsewhere as well," Starr said.

"The presidential election of 2020 with its unprecedented feature of the use of mail-in ballots has given rise to a number of questions that deserve to be answered."

Ya damn skippy!

I wonder why they were reluctant *wink wink*.

A report from a Supreme Court staffer is indicating that Chief Justice John Roberts folded on the landmark Texas election fraud case because he was scared of riots and violence from left-wing terror groups.

He said the justices, as they always do, went into a closed room to discuss cases they’re taking and to debate.

When the Texas case was brought up, he heard screaming through the walls, as Justice Roberts and the other liberal justices were insisting that this case not be taken up, and the reason the words that were heard through the wall when Justice Thomas and Justice Alito were citing ‘Bush v. Gore’ from John Roberts were “I don’t give a ***** about ‘Bush vs Gore’… at that time we didn’t have riots!”

Huh. WoW. Where did you get that quote. I would love to share that.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1339652797738999811?s=20

Watch the video

Thanks.

Read the rulings! It absolutely was not procedural - they were absolutely scathing in their assessment of the quality of the evidence. The word "baseless" is all over the judges' rulings. It was garbage. It wasn't procedural, your case was garbage.

https://hereistheevidence.com/election-2020/stats/

Courts have already tossed this out. What makes you think I'm interested in things that a judge has already said is garbage?

You don't prove things on the Internet. You prove them in court. Nothing else matters.

Never cared for what they say
Never cared for games they play
Never cared for what they do
Never cared for what they know (or y'know, don't know as is actually the case).

You know, it would actually be the most Metallica thing in the world if that actually had been about one of their lawsuits.

There is the evidence. The judge didn't hear the evidence, as the site states. I can't show you something when you refuse to see it.

Read the rulings. The judges heard the evidence and wrote many times throughout the 60 rulings that the evidence is garbage. It doesn't meet legal standard. Don't read the website - it's lying to you - read the rulings for yourself, THEY will tell you what the judges were thinking because THAT IS THE POINT OF THESE DOCUMENTS.

There have been no evidentiary hearings of the lawsuits Trump's legal team has brought. Most of those cases you are referring to are not even from Trump's legal team.

Rudy Giuliani himself was in like four of them. Read the rulings, they make everything VERY clear.

Feel free to provide links to the rulings so everyone who is interested can read them. I will provide another link that details the evidence, with citations. https://bannonswarroom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Immaculate-Deception-12.15.20-1.pdf

THE COURT RULINGS OF THESE CASES *ARE* A CITATION. These documents are very specific. There is no ambiguity as to which documents I'm talking about. And they are public documents.

THAT MEANS YOU CAN READ THEM YOURSELF. Asking me for a link makes no sense - EVERYONE has access to this information. Read any of the court rulings for the 60 cases Trump and the RNC has put to the courts in the last two months. You can do that yourself.

I'm asking you to post a link to these rulings so I can read them. If you say everyone has access to them, then it should not be difficult for you to post a link to one of them online so people here, myself included, can read them. I don't understand why you seem so upset. You want me to read them, and I am asking you to provide the link so I can do that.

Pick one of the lawsuits. There are 60 so if you think I'm going to go through them all, you can dream on. Go to the county clerk website. Search for that case and download the rulings.

There. That's as good as a link.

"wEll, I {PosTeD a LiNK tO aN ArtiCLe sO I WOn" No. Grow up.

You don't name a single lawsuit, nor do you provide a link. You say nothing about the substance of the proof I posted, you only say it's debunked. This isn't about winning, its about getting to the facts. I think its obvious by now that you don't want to face the facts.

All of them! There are 60! How could you miss them? Trump hasn't won ANY. Read them!

Wrong

Read the rulings!

Does it? I don’t think so. Donald will be gone. And you will be in dire need of copium

Oh look, another leftist shill with no substance in their argument. Only lowering themselves to petty insults.

:)

Exactly.

They were dismissed for a whole range of reasons. Your efforts to characterize them as amounting to technicalities are just wrong. These suits were flawed from top to bottom including mischaracterizing the law, lacking substantial evidence, being filed too late, seeking to overturn the constitutional order, federalism, and election process as we know it, etc etc.

Down to and including the petty mistakes like being riddled with typos and formatting errors as the obvious product of alcohol and Ritalin- and possibly cocaine-fueled all-nighters the likes of which would be instantly recognizable to any law professor.

Tl;dr Meritless suits lack merit

I love how all the leftists who respond only can shout at us, but can't offer an opposing argument. Huh, because there is none!!

Hmm. You're weird.

We will see how butthurt will you be when Biden isn’t inaugurated on January 20th.

They actually do.

Not bullshit. Watch the senate hearing. About an hour and 19 minutes in. ;)

If you watch the entire thing you’ll see that the claims of no fraud are bullsh!t

Actually, it's the claims of no evidence that are BS. That evidence needs to be followed to determine if it's fraud or criminal negligence. (Both major issues, but there is a difference)

I stand corrected

Yes bullshit. Almost every claim has been refuted.

Not considered refuted if the courts refuse to hear the case only because they’re afraid the racist, hate-mongering, violently insane democrats are going to riot. That’s what is bullshit. As states in the Wednesday senate hearing, “Trump’s cases should have been heard.”

"ThE cOuRtS rEfUsEd To HeAr ThE cAsE" is utter bullshit, and you know it.

This Election was "the most secure in American history" is utter bullshit, and you know it.

Doesith thyist havist a brainst?

Did you read his comment or his meme for that matter? You need to, or else you'll start making memes like this.

I've been trying to say this in my debates, but they just skip right over its and get right back to the profanity

Just have fun with them - that's all they are good for. So far, not a single one of the Trump cultists ever wanted to engage in a real discussion, they only want to hear the nice reverberating sounds of the echo chamber they live in.

Huh, funny. Because media sites like CNN and ABC, etc, filtered out any stories about Biden and Hunter, until they thought they had the election, and now are "covering" it.

The only "filter" exists in your brain.

If that's a persistent condition, refer to any psychiatrist for help.

No, that's actually not true. There is some sort of filter in anyone's brain, but the Leftist Media loves to hide things that go against their agenda.

And the "alternative media" who are mostly lacking any reliable and notable journalistic infrastructure (thus having to pull their fairy tales out of their own asses) were able to uncover this gigantic, worldwide conspiracy against the only person on this planet who had never told a single lie in his whole life.

Sure. You should better follow my advice voluntarily before the men with the straight jackets are coming for you, preventing harm to the sane people around.

Huh. Another insult that has not a single meaning. I done with idiots such as yourself.

no one is threatening to harm the sane people except you libs. your empty threats try to pack the power you don't have.

um is that another baseless insult?

Oops, sorry - for a fleeting moment I had mistaken you for someone else.

Like, not being another brain addled Trump cultist. Mea culpa.

trump supporters are not brain addled cultists thank you very much

those are the baseless insult I, and everyone else are talking about

Baseless as in "attending a Trump rally in fcuking freezing cold Omaha on a windblown airstrip and nearly dying when their cult leader simply didn't care for their safe return"?

Or baseless as in "okay, the risk of catching CoViD is damn too high but I'm going to attend the Trump rally anyway - and as the cultist I am, I do as my cult leader does and refuse to wear a mask, too"?

Or the super baseless "if my cult leader says that swallowing or injecting bleach helps I better get the 5-gallon jug?"

Need more "baseless" facts about you belonging to the cultist herd too? I can keep this on and on and on...

lol those are THE most ridiculous things I have ever heard.

it was their choice to show up, its a free country (at least right now). he's not gonna say "hey, im having this rally and its really cold don't come. oh im fine cause im immune to cold" srsly, go complain about people who go to football games in the middle of a blizzard.

the risk of Covid is actually extremely low (0.1%), and masks are about as effective as a chainlink fence trying to keep out dust. the only reason surgeons wear them is to keep the guts off their face. it is (as you libs say) my body my choice. and I am perfectly free to not wear a mask if I so choose.

im not sure where you got the bleach thing, but obviously no one is doing that. if you are referring to the certain chemicals called Chloroquine and hydroxycloroquine, (which is found in fish tank cleaner), they were actually successfully treating severe cases with it. but you obviously can not take it in the fish tank cleaner form, which is why that lady's hubby died.

and no one is doing anything just because trump does. (you might have noticed that he is not the most charismatic of people) We do it because we take time to learn what is actually going on, and not from news sources.

yes please! do give me more, this is fun

Last words of mine to you since you had proven that you are as brain addled as the other Trump cult followers here:

1. Responsibility: Trump should have canceled that event under these conditions if he would have ever cared for his followers, know that no heated limo is waiting for them withing spitting distance after his fairytale hour. But since Trump is a narcissist, caring for others beside him is completely out of his minds grasp.

2. The risk of acquiring CoViD is actually VERY HIGH, as proven by the number of new infections per 24h. And the USA is great again when it comes to these numbers of infected and dead. Praise Trump your cult leader for first denying, then downplaying and virtually doing nothing substantial to fight CoViD!

3. The "bleach thing" was real, it was all over the world news and dumb Trump was absolutely serious at the moment he had uttered that utterly bullshit. Later he tried to downplay (as always) that as a joke, but it was too late - another evidence of Trump being inept and unfit as the POTUS.

4. Yeah - news are bad. But only for the brain addled Trump cultists.

Goodbye...boyo.

and I also said your insults were baseless lol and you jump to "facts" are baseless. even though they are