Imgflip Logo Icon

Stop trying to steal Michigan's vote! We chose Trump in 2016 and we're gonna choose him now in 2020!

Stop trying to steal Michigan's vote! We chose Trump in 2016 and we're gonna choose him now in 2020! | democrats realizing they're losing Michigan; "finding" 200,000 votes only for Biden | image tagged in spongebob box,memes,politics,michigan,trump 2020,maga | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2,059 views 78 upvotes Made by Captain_Scar 4 years ago in politics
Spongebob box memeCaption this Meme
108 Comments
5 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Laughing Leo Meme | THEY COULD HAVE AT LEAST INCLUDED 1 TRUMP VOTE SO IT WOULDN'T LOOK SUSPICIOUS | image tagged in memes,laughing leo | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
1 up, 4y
lol
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
oof. As an a citizen of Alabama we don't worry about that
3 ups, 4y,
3 replies
Ah, sweet home Alabama!
But I love Michigan, that's why I can't stand watching them cheat us like this
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y
yeah. We usually don't have fraud because we are a very republican state
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Don’t you people say pop and devils night?
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Yeah, we say pop
Devils night?
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
It’s tonic, ya weirdo.
2 ups, 4y
Never heard of it
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
ItS SoDa
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
POP
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
SODA

(or if you are really southern you just say coke)
[deleted]
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Montana resident here: I feel like an outcast saying 'soda' in a land of 'pop' people. However we all know it's the proper term.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
Yes lol
0 ups, 4y,
2 replies
What makes you think the democrats are cheating? Have you seen how many lawsuits trump has filed. He told blatant lies and was so confident of his victory. If he was so confident, then why would your party blame the democrats for cheating? The reason nevada is taking for ever to count is because the ballot counters are counting votes 5 times over so trump wouldn't have an excuse. Stop complaining
0 ups, 4y
yea i aregre
0 ups, 4y
Oh I dunno, maybe it's the fact that they're not letting pollwatchers in and are blocking up the windows so no-one can see in? Why would they need to do that?
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Last I saw you guys were trying to stop counting legally cast votes
I wonder why
3 ups, 4y,
3 replies
Is that where they were trying to keep the perfectly legal poll watchers out?
I wonder why
[deleted]
4 ups, 4y,
1 reply
There were at least 30 Michigan citizens trying to get it at once

I’m glad to be somewhere that’s mostly red, there will be damn riots everywhere that has a near even split.
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Can I get you on the record saying you're glad to be somewhere red? :)
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y
For once, yes
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
But that’s out of context
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Because you'd hate to be around a bunch of leftists when they start rioting? :)
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Can’t spell patriot without riot
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Ok?
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
I’m just saying I’m not above rioting-
2 ups, 4y
...
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
Nope, because BOTH sides are gonna revolt because of the others
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
We'll see
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
*laughs* yes we will
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y
TRUMP 2020!!!
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y
TRUMP 2020!!!!
0 ups, 4y
Yeah, but the right doesn’t support tearing history down & burning things like the left does.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
voter fraud is in 0.00006 percent of cases, yet republicans always make this seem like a big deal because they are trying to limit the number of mail-in ballots being cast
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Ahhhhh, it's only in 0.00006 percent huh? Where'd you get that number?
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
https://shass.mit.edu/news/news-2020-pandemic-voting-mail-safe-honest-and-fair-stewart
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
April 28 2020

Doesn't that seem a little outdated?
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
No, it's not outdated. Unless you say we shouldn't cite sources that are from more than 6 months ago. Of course, the study was over a 20 year span; six months aren't that big of a difference.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Except this election is far different from others... so I wouldn’t cite stuff from b4 ppl proposed the mail-in ballots
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
"Except this election is far different from others."

How so
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Well considering there's new information to be taken into consideration, yeah, it's outdated
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
1 reply
The study was conducted over a twenty year span. Six months wouldn't really change much in the study.

So you're telling me that the information from twenty years conducted for the study was only applicable in six months?
0 ups, 4y,
1 reply
Considering that this is the first time we've used mail-in voting to such an extent, yeah, it's not applicable anymore
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
The number of ballots doesn't really determine the percentage of voter fraud; it's like saying because this year is 2020 that means that all previous studies are false because they weren't written in 2020. I think that that is basically a moot point.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Why the hell would you want inside? To get in on all that envelope action?
3 ups, 4y
You should look up all the cases of voter fraud so far, it might shock you
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
4 replies
The in person votes are overwhelmingly republican, and the mail in votes are overwhelmingly democrat
3 ups, 4y,
1 reply
You don't find 138,000 and have every single on of them for the same person
it's statistically impossible
[deleted]
2 ups, 4y,
2 replies
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Oh please, explain it to me then

In that area where those ballots were found, we'll say votes were about 2:1 in Biden's favor
That means that you have 2/3 probability of taking any one ballot and it being Biden
Now, you have to multiply 2/3 138,000 times to find the probability that out of a group of 138,000 ballots, all of them are for Biden
Now, why don't you go put 2/3 (or .66) to the power of 138,000 into a calculator and see what comes out (HINT: It's probably gonna be zero)
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
1 up, 4y
I’m just quoting idubbbz on this one.

“Don’t use the word ‘possible.’ Don’t even use the word ‘improbable.’ Neither of those words are of enough magnitude to explain your odds of [getting 100,000 all for Biden.]. ‘Impossible.’ ‘Impossible’ are your odds. Our brains are not wired to comprehend the unlikeliness.”

This is from a video where he talks about how the lottery is impossible. And that’s the same odds as 99.9999% of votes being for Biden.
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
Wow figure that all out by yourself? Of course I know it's not actually zero, it's just so miniscule of a number that it can't list it.

What do you think I just did?
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
1 up, 4y,
1 reply
What do you think statistically impossible means? Please, tell me
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
4 replies
1 up, 4y
0 ups, 4y
Yeah, so what does that mean? Because I used that word, but you don't seem to think it means the same thing as I do
0 ups, 4y
Anything is possible huh?
0 ups, 4y
Evidently not
What does it mean?
0 ups, 4y
So, what don't I understand?
1 up, 4y
2 ups, 4y
B/c republicans don’t want their votes pitched for not being democrat.
& 138,000 at one time all 4 one person is still ridiculous.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y
Lol true
Show More Comments
Spongebob box memeCaption this Meme
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
democrats realizing they're losing Michigan; "finding" 200,000 votes only for Biden