Imgflip Logo Icon

Shame on the wicked people who opposed your nomination!

Shame on the wicked people who opposed your nomination! |  CONGRATULATIONS! AMY CONEY BARRETT, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, US SUPREME COURT | image tagged in memes,amy coney barrett,supreme court,stupid liberals | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
share
3,502 views 133 upvotes Made by bbbadboy 3 months ago in politics
Add Meme
Add Image
Post Comment
Best first
147 Comments
reply
12 ups, 3m,
2 replies
A victory for women! Hopefully including women not born yet.
reply
5 ups, 3m,
1 reply
A victory for hate!
reply
2 ups, 3m,
1 reply
Troll.
reply
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
Because I don't agree with your opinion I'm a troll?
reply
1 up, 3m,
2 replies
Waiting Skeleton Meme | ME WAITING FOR SPOOKY TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF ACB'S HOMOPHOBIA/TRANSPHOBIA | image tagged in memes,waiting skeleton | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
If you can't provide any evidence then all I can assume is that you're bigoted against catholics and assuming they're a bad person because of their religion.
reply
0 ups, 3m,
1 reply
I'm of the opinion that's part of why she was chosen in the first place. But I kind of think this is a fake argument and you don't actually care about evidence of that....
Maybe I'll return when she actually begins ruling in on supreme court cases.
reply
0 ups, 3m
You do that, anything before then is pure speculation and part of what I'm trying to prove here. All the claims are currently fearmongering nonsense with nothing to back them. Does that mean it's impossible she'll rule the way you guys expect? No. But there's no evidence currently to suggest that. Same as with Kavanaugh and Gorsuch.. the exact same arguments were made and thus far virtually NONE of those arguments have proven to be accurate, and they've even ruled against the same president that nominated them more than once.
reply
0 ups, 3m,
1 reply
Disliking homosexual marriage is pretty bad.
reply
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
Where did she say she disliked it? Again, EVIDENCE. You are making claims without anything to back them up. Why should I believe anything you're saying? Show me a quote or a court ruling or SOMETHING. Otherwise you're just being a religiophobe and making things up to slander her. No better than the people doing the same to ilhan omar(though they at least have SOME evidence)
reply
0 ups, 3m,
1 reply
I'm not being a religiphobe. I'm catholic and there isn't a court ruling as of right now
reply
1 up, 3m,
3 replies
So.. you're accusing ACB of homophobia and transphobia for no reason at all?
reply
2 ups, 3m,
1 reply
She's already dug her own grave. Anyway she'll double down on this soon if she hasn't already.
1 up, 3m
It must really suck to live your life constantly assuming the worst about people for no reason other than their belief. Doesn't all that hate you carry around make you feel sick?
reply
0 ups, 3m,
1 reply
did you see my evidence
1 up, 3m
I did, and none of it comes from her. It's all accusations from people opposed to her nomination with nothing of substance to back it up. The only thing that might be dubious is the people of faith organization or whatever it's called, and even that has absolutely nothing to do with what she will or won't do as a judge.
reply
0 ups, 3m
According to you I hate religon but according to me I don't so you have to follow that logic through with me
reply
4 ups, 3m,
2 replies
I think the furthest the court will ever go would be either relegating civil marriage to states again or preventing the government from 'marrying' people but requiring that it recognize any couple's ability to live together and claim financial and tax benefits from doing so. There's no Constitutional basis for preventing civil legislation that allows two people to live together...in fact doing so would be a downright violation of the 1st Amendment.

That being said, that also means people can't get triggered when Catholics, Jews, and Muslims oppose same-sex couples living together. It's a two way street paved with salt.
reply
2 ups, 3m
If there is one place I want a conservative majority, it's the Supreme Court. They are clearly the last hope of reigning in our corrupt and ineffective government and protecting the people from reckless populism and political wars.

The way the law stands, two heterosexual men could marry and live together for tax benefits, all the while dating women. I'd love to see it happen, just for the precedent.
reply
2 ups, 3m,
1 reply
You nailed it. A constitutional originalist cannot do the things that the left is claiming about ACB because the constitution says nothing that would give them the opinion that those rulings were unconstitutional or wrong. The very worst that could happen is for it to go back to the states.
reply
1 up, 3m
Exactly.
reply
4 ups, 3m,
3 replies
So. Women shouldn't be able to marry other women anyway.
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 3m,
2 replies
wow, a homophobic piece of shit, this is why the world thinks christians are homophobic, and i see you are taking away basic rights you fascist
reply
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
WoW. Great language from someone proposed to know the truth. What? So I state 7th-grade knowledge and all of a sudden I represent all Christians in something that is not involving Christianity? How did you make that up?

Me hating the perversion of reality is not fascism. You need to relearn how to explain your thoughts, without making up facts in the process.
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 3m,
2 replies
Saying *Women shouldnt be allowed to marry women* is denying basic rights, denying basic rights is fascism
reply
0 ups, 3m,
2 replies
No, it is not. Denying science is not a basic right. It is against what IS right.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
I'm sorry, but this isn't the 1940s, homosexuals do have rights, abortion is a right, you dont have to be male and female, just because you marry someone of your gender, does not mean you are mentally ill, thinking that it is wrong for them to marry and should be illegal is mentally ill behavior, take your pills again
reply
0 ups, 3m
You obviously have no idea what 1984 is about.

The slaughter of a baby should not be a right.

Don't be unkind, it doesn't help either of our arguments. ;)
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
So just because they dont make a baby it is not right? Thats stupid, there is nothing wrong with a women marrying a women
reply
0 ups, 3m,
1 reply
You assumed my point before I made one, then invalidated me based on it. STOP ASSUMING.

If basic human science denies women and a women marrying, or a man and a man, then there has to be something out of order. In other words, if a man on man and woman on a woman cannot produce a baby, which is science denying the interaction, then there is a problem.
reply
[deleted]
0 ups, 3m,
1 reply
So now you care about science right? Is everyone supposed to have a child? is that your perfect world?
0 ups, 3m
You missed the point. You don't have to have a baby to be "right." You have to be male and female, married by law and family.
reply
0 ups, 3m
Basic rights.
Come and get your basic rights.
We got your right to life, liberty, and property!
We changed property to “pursuit of happiness” in the Constitution because John Locke wasn’t broad enough.
But we ran out of those “basic rights” to homosexuality and pronoun stuff.
In fact, we didn’t have those in the first place.
reply
0 ups, 3m,
1 reply
And this is why you're not convincing a lot of Christians to join the gay agenda.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
Actually, its you and your christian buddys who harass, attack and do other shit to homosexuals and make them not want to be homosexual
reply
1 up, 3m
“Harass” meaning “tell them homosexuality is incorrect.”
“Attack” meaning “show them where in the Bible it says homosexuality is a sin.”
“Make them not want to be homosexual”. That’s... why I’m here. - Obi Wan

Unless you’re trying to be hyperbolic, which I doubt, your comment makes no sense.
reply
4 ups, 3m,
2 replies
Yes they can you moron
reply
1 up, 3m
Nope.
reply
1 up, 3m
I don't care if you think I am a homo for stating simple Biology. I am going to state the truth no matter what.
reply
4 ups, 3m,
2 replies
reply
2 ups, 3m,
2 replies
Whatever man. Think what you want. You are still wrong.
reply
0 ups, 3m
That's your opinion.
reply
0 ups, 3m,
1 reply
I'm female and I can't wait for one of the republican judges to resign
reply
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
I am sad for you. You have been deceived.
reply
0 ups, 3m,
1 reply
How have I been deceived
reply
1 up, 3m,
7 replies
You have been brainwashed to believe that democratic leaning judges are going to better our country, which it will not. They will turn our country into an Orwellian Society (BTW: you need to read 1984 by George Orwell ASAP).
reply
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
I define hate speech as Nazism zand other extreme examples of prejudice
0 ups, 3m
Give me one confirmed quote from her.
reply
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
I'm impressed with your argument. I just feel that we need the supreme court to be balanced to erase bias.
0 ups, 3m
Thanks!

You can't erase bias on Earth. This is something that many people don't understand, which is why they will vote for Biden Harris. They don't have a category for the results of socialism, communism, and fascism, which is what they will bring upon us.
reply
1 up, 3m,
2 replies
Homosexuality is not a crime. And if she wants to erase a group she is prejudiced.
1 up, 3m
I never said it was. That is obviously not the point.

She does not want to "erase a group", which is called genocide.
0 ups, 3m
She never said she was going to do any of the things you're accusing her of. All she said was she was going to interpret the constitution as it was written. The constitution doesn't say ANYTHING about gay marriage, therefore she will likely have nothing to say on the topic. If anything, "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is a line in the constitution that may actually have her siding with the LGBTQ community. Stop buying into the propaganda wholesale and try listening to what the woman has to say for herself instead of putting words in her mouth.
reply
0 ups, 3m
She will double down soon
reply
0 ups, 3m,
3 replies
She opposes gay marriage. Opposing gay marriage is pretty bad when there is a majority of republican judges
1 up, 3m
Just because she opposes that does not mean she is a homophobe.

For example, if I vote for a policy that creates more punishment for murderers does not mean I am bigoted towards murderers, it means I want to make the crime itself more punishable because it is so bad.
0 ups, 3m
When did she say she opposed gay marriage? Never.
0 ups, 3m
No, it isn't.
reply
0 ups, 3m,
2 replies
I think hate speech should be restricted and that is all
1 up, 3m
You can't enforce that. Nor can any one person define "hate speech" for all people.

If I could snap my fingers, I would restrict hate speech too, but I cannot. Nor can a society. What ends up happening is Russia, Nazi Germany, and Italy. There is no line drawn between what someone in power thinks of free speech and what the majority wants. Also, when the majority makes the decisions, it is called mob rule.
0 ups, 3m
Who decides what is hate speech? The government right now is republican controlled. If they were to decide that pro-BLM speech was hate speech would you feel like that was okay? If you restrict free speech at all that is the risk you're running. The only reason you feel okay with it right now is because you're the one threatening to restrict someone else.
reply
0 ups, 3m,
3 replies
Too much free speech can bring out the worst in someone. Also I think that it's quite bad that a homophobe and transphobe is our new judge.
1 up, 3m
And the thing about free speech. You can't have a utopia. You cannot enforce free speech and restrict some at the same time. It doesn't work. It never has and never will. If you have ever know the truth about and of the great wars and any draconian society, then you will understand.
1 up, 3m
Someone who does not agree with the LGBTQ+ community is not a homophobe. Someone who is bigoted (slanders, shouts, tears down) a gay person is a homophobe.
0 ups, 3m
Give some evidence of ACB being homophobic or transphobic, please. A quote should be easy enough for you to find if you're that certain.
reply
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
Stop being a child
reply
0 ups, 3m,
1 reply
Said the 12 year old
reply
1 up, 3m,
1 reply
stop it.
reply
[deleted]
1 up, 3m,
7 replies
reply
1 up, 3m
Your mockery actually gives me a sense of how dumb you are
reply
1 up, 3m
Why do you hate lgbtq people
reply
0 ups, 3m
Well you actually are an idiot just not the level of idiocy you displayed in that comment
reply
0 ups, 3m
Yes that is a line from hamlet.
reply
0 ups, 3m
You believe that I can't be believed is what it means
reply
0 ups, 3m
how do I harm lgbtq people
reply
0 ups, 3m
I couldn't care less from a man child like yourself
Show More Comments
Flip Settings
memes
gifs
other
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
CONGRATULATIONS! AMY CONEY BARRETT, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, US SUPREME COURT
hotkeys: D = random, W = upvote, S = downvote, A = back
Feedback