Notice the report's from CNN...

Because you live in an online echo chamber, and you likely associate with people who feel the same as you do. The only thing you see and hear is pro-trump messaging.

It's like saying "everyone in America lives in my city because everyone I meet lives in my city."

Because, yes, 99.9% of the people you meet in a day live where you do but 99.9% of American's don't live in your city.

I wasn't talking about on this site, & ik the dems went & fled 2 their own little stream b/c they couldn't stand hearing another point of view. Matter of fact, I've even ventured 2 comment in there sometimes (huge mistake).

No i'm talking about when u go out & look at signs on the road. The city I live in is mostly liberal, but i see far more trump signs regardless.

yes, we are talking about the same thing. You live in a world that is much smaller than you think. Where you live and who you associate with impacts how you think the world works.

I live in Texas. IN 2016, there were Trump signs ALL OVER the place. Now?

I've just seen 2 this week. 1 of them was home-made.

I have seen a few Biden signs. All of them campaign signs and a campaign office for Biden just opened down the road.

In Texas.

Biden has a lot more ads recently, but trump is our clear winner

That's because they are blocking Trump ads.

Ikr? Well the internet can have em, but tv won't as much.

Ikr

So you are aware of what anecdotal evidence is, and how it's not a reliable way of gauging what the general population is?

Now apply that logic to the lying media claiming Biden is ahead in the polls.

So you have no clue what anecdotal evidence is. Got it.

So, you crawled onto another Meme pretending to be intelligent but once again are using your opinion as facts. From my personal experience of the non existent Biden signs and lack of attendance at his pitiful rallies it's safe to say the anecdotal evidence doesn't favor Biden

We've already established that your TV tells you what to think and say, that's where your anecdotal evidence isn't reliable.

Now limp onto another Meme, like always.

Your astonishing stupidity never ceases to amaze me. It is evidently clear you have NO idea whatsoever what an anecdote is.

An anecdotal evidence is a personal testimony; in other words a story. This is contrasted with empirical evidence, where you accumulate information using DATA, which requires sample sizes, like polls. Empirical evidence is infinitely more reliable than anecdotal evidence, for obvious reasons. Polls are empirical evidence. They use sample sizes, often times with sample sizes over 1000. And most of them show Biden with a gigantic lead. You can choose to ignore that in favor of anecdotal evidence, but it only shows your colossal stupidity.

And also this part of your response: "It's safe to say the anecdotal evidence doesn't favor Biden." makes absolutely no sense. Anecdotal evidence doesn't favor one side over the other, because it's anecdotal evidence that relies on personal accounts. From my personal experience, most of the houses I see all have Biden signs. Using my anecdotal evidence, Biden is winning. Your anecdotal evidence shows otherwise. But how can Biden and Trump be simultaneously winning? And that is why anecdotal evidence is not reliable.

The evidence is clear I know exactly what an anecdote is, as usual you ignore the evidence and use insults to prop up your failing argument. See, It's right there for everyone to see, you don't see it... you're blinded by your own arrogance.

An anecdotal evidence is a personal testimony; in other words a story. Like the stories you hear from individuals pretending to be journalists on TV that accumulated Data from hand picked polls.

Here's empirical evidence. The same polls that told you Hillary would win by a landslide are telling you same gullible fools that Biden will win by a landslide.

What I've seen is Anecdotal evidence (personal account). What you've seen is what the media wants you to see or doesn't want you to see. That's a fact.

Lets use real empirical evidence that can be fact checked by both sides. Post a photo or video of a Biden rally. There was one in AZ this week, it should be easy to find a photo.
It will be even easier to show everyone who attended, they all fit in one single photo.

Now of course you'll bleat talking points you heard on TV like Trump's rally is a super spreader event, while trying to deflect from the handful of people at Biden's rally.

1. Biden isn't holding campaign rallies because of covid. The small Biden "rallies" were not rallies, but rather small campaign events.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/09/22/fact-check-joe-biden-events-smaller-because-covid-19/5780898002/

2. Trump rallies are not representative of the entire voting population dude.

3. 2016 polling is not comparable to 2020. At this point, the polls only showed Hillary leading by two to three points in swing states. There are also other reasons:

https://www.npr.org/2020/08/08/900338253/why-the-2020-presidential-election-is-not-2016
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/07/seven-reasons-why-2020-is-not-just-another-2016.html

5. Polls, biased or not are infinitely more reliable than a personal account.

4. The arizona story is misleading.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/oct/12/facebook-posts/biden-harris-arizona-event-had-no-fanfare-because-/

1. Another lie. I said you'd bleat what you were told to say, here you are bleating like the mindless gullible sheep you are. Your newest talking point you were told to bleat... Change rally to small campaign event, and hope people are as stupid as you are. Next you'll be saying no one showed at a small Biden campaign event because no one is invited.

2 Trump rallies are not representative of the entire voting population dude.
But small Biden campaign events are if you're a mindless sheep who believes what you're told. Oh look, A mindless sheep.

3 2016 polling is not comparable to 2020.
The polls are saying exactly what they said in 2016. You were gullible in 2016, you're gullible in 2020. There are also other reasons: None of which include you were lied to.

4 You're as bad at counting as you are at coping with reality.

5. Polls, biased or not are infinitely more reliable than a personal account.
I refer to the 2016 polls.. again, while you create another lame excuse for your own gullibility.

4a for sheep struggling to count at a kindergarten level.
The Arizona story is misleading. Biden-Harris Arizona event had no fanfare because the campaign didn’t invite the public
A small campaign event that didn't invite anyone. Got it. Biden and Harris went to Arizona to not hold a small campaign event. Told ya.
The media lies and you believe it because you can't think for yourself.

So to recap:
You're as gullible today as you were in 2016
Small campaign events aren't campaign events if no one shows up uninvited.
You can't count to 4
Excuses. Excuses and more excuses.
You believe the lying media
You can't think for yourself.

4fnlq0.jpg (click to show) - This is why!

I tried to count Biden signs, I couldn't find any. It's the same with Pro-Biden Memes on Flip, they don't exist.
Here's where you use the excuse, Biden supporters don't need Biden signs. There's plenty of Pro-Biden Memes in leftist safe space echo chambers.

They're all on politicsTOO. They couldn't stand 2 hear conservatives so they made a liberal stream.

Liberals didn't make politicsTOO, They whined to Imgflip for a circle jerk safe space. Imgflip gave them what they wanted, and then they realized they aren't special when everyone is special.
They come to the politics stream because they want to make everyone as miserable as they are.

Lol