Brokeback Cowboys

4et0qh.jpg [image not found] Down 16% in viewership.

I'm not watching it now. Not seeing the ads that pay contracts. And I'm not paying for extra cable channels either - I cancelled them months ago.

Trumpers are just straight out of Idiocracy these days!

So simple, even you can understand it!

Personal attacks and slander are not useful

A non sequitur is a reply that "does not follow"

For example
If I said "Timber is trying to use non sequitor to mean irrelevant."

And then you said "I like turtles"

That would be a non sequitur.

Boycott all professional sports promoting the racist BLM agenda.

They should definitely be fired.

Peaceful protests like that cannot be tolerated.. because.. feelings.

I'm not saying they should be fired, but don't whine when the fans "counter-protest."

Fans can do whatever they want.. That industry is probably going to get their *ss handed to them anyway with covid going on.

Yeah yeah, protest against civil rights all you want. That is your right. Freedom of speech and all.

When people protest for civil rights, and you protest against them, you are protesting their civil rights.

Carry your shame too, that is your right too.

Who is protesting for civil rights? Not the NFL players... they are protesting for a provably false assertion of systemic racism and police bias. None of that it based on fact. Even George Floyd wasn't killed by a cop and it was never shown to be racism anyway --- just falsely claimed to be.

So no... no one is protesting for civil rights in this case.

They are paid to play a game. So play the game. Not to demonstrate their complete ignorance on political matters. If the fans want to stand for what's right and boo the players, so be it.

You lie as easily as Trump does!

And you mislabel truth as lies as all liberals do.

Why are most of your comments attacks on character, slander, and name calling?

Bullshit, with no sources, because there is no evidence of their bullshit

Neither did you.

Bitch please?

Did you miss all the links, or ignore them on purpose?

Why are most of your comments attacks on character, slander and name calling?

Don't be a troll, Don't get called troll. I try to be accurate in the names I call.

It isn't slander, to point out that I posted links, when someone claims I brought no links. That is just accurate.

Are you concerned that your trolling is getting called out?

Timber isn't a troll.

More profanity and your blocked. Grow up and learn.

Learn to read

F**k a doodle doo

Both autopsy reports indicated the cause of death for George Floyd was homicide.

Show your evidence, post the link.

95% peaceful protests, in response to a police murdering black people at a rate 2.5 times higher than whites.

Source:

U.S. Crisis Monitor

https://acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations-political-violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/

False. Official autopsy showed fentanyl caused death. Family paid autopsy showed false claim of suffocation. Keep up.

Your rate is completely false. And “killing” is not murdering. Thug of any color resists arrest and forces escalation. It’s on them.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/george-floyd-death-autopsies-homicide-axphyxiation-details/

Oh look at that, both official autopsy reports say cause of death is homicide.

You are wrong, and irrational.

Name a legitimate news source.

Yeah, I thought you wouldn't admit that the autopsy reports agree on cause of death, even with sources you already approved.

You aren't learning, it sucks. I think I have to be done trying with you.

No, I was waiting to share articles from your preffered sources. Both state that George Floyd autopsys agree the cause of death is homicide. Are you going to admit it now?

https://www.foxnews.com/us/results-of-george-floyd-independent-autopsy-expected-today

https://www.breitbart.com/news/family-autopsy-floyd-asphyxiated-by-sustained-pressure/

Evidence please

Cherry picker.

I know you have no evidence, and I provided you with both available autopsy reports via a CBS news link. Such cherry picking.

Here have a few more sources you disingenuous fake.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/01/us/george-floyd-independent-autopsy/index.html

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-minneapolis-police-autopsy-idUSKBN2383JO

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/06/01/george-floyd-independent-autopsy-findings-released-monday/5307185002/

It isn't cherry picking, when every where I reach is fruitful.

Name a news source you trust then.

I have given four sources, they all report on primary documentation. You are disingenuous, and so is your argument.

So you don't trust any sources. There is no source that is "good enough". Which means we have no method of determining truth.

Veracity is not based on what opinion you had before being exposed to evidence.

Evidence is evidence. An autopsy report is evidence.

You are a purposely spreading disinformation as far as I can tell. Telling people there is no way to verify information, because no source is trustworthy, is a lie. Flat out not true

Primary sources can be trusted

Several different source cross referenced with each other can be trusted.

You are the closed minded person who won't believe independent reporting from different news agencies.

I consider facts, read sources, and am willing to change my mind, that is what having an open mind is.

You won't allow anything to change your mind, even new information, that is what having a closed mind is.

It is your right to create false arguments to win.

You build a nice straw man, I bet your snow men are good too

That isn't a protest, is it? It is an individual, not a movement.

Also, source for your claim please?

Your protesting rioters rioted after that good shoot. Rioted over a thug who previously stabbed 4 people. They just want any excuse to burn and loot.

4f8qlr.gif (click to show)

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/tear-gas-crowd-protesting-fatal-police-shooting-72993693

Oh look, the guy with a knife didn't claim it was his civil rights to attack cops with knives.

Your fake news is still fake.

In fact, the sister of the person with the knife, had called the cops to have them involuntarily commited. Killing the personwith the knife wasn't needed, that us the whole point. Cops disarm knife wielding individuals without killing them often. They are trained to disarm.

You're proving my point. Cops aren't the people who should respond to mental health breakdowns. Mental health professionals should be committing patients, not cops.

This isn't the first time a cop has shot a mental patient, after their loved one called for help.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54041549

Are you retarded? You think a MHP could have dealt with a pyscho sprinting at them with a knife?

How would you disarm him? I suppose YOU would be perfectly calm and give your life up if it meant not hurting him. Hahahahaha you airchair quarterbacks make me laugh my guts out. I doubt you were ever in a situation where your life was at risk.

No one but the biggest of morons thinks that wasn't justified. That pyscho should have still been locked up after stabbing FOUR people just recently. Closing down so many insane asylums was a huge mistake.

And you still don't get my point. People protested over that. Violently. You don't have the right to charge at a cop with a weapon. I never said the pyscho said that so that's fake news from you.

Any group of four with proper training can disarm a knife wielder without harm.

It is safer than guns too.

Oh look, pictured above, UK police disarm knife wielding man without murdering him.

Police shouldn't be murdering people.

Yeah, too bad that cop was alone. But go right ahead and defund departments. And that guy obviously didn't come sprinting out of a house.

Guess what? Cops are human too and when they get attacked they have to do what they can to survive. But I know, you want them to be unable to defend themselves so they get killed and no one wants to be a cop.

Ain't a perfect world, regardless of your equality of outcome wish. When perps put cops lives in danger, they have a right to respond. You are f**ked in the head if you don't think suicide by cop isn't a thing. But I know, all cops are bad and every thug didn't do nuffin. Just innocent boys.

You still never said what YOU would do in that situation where the cop should have just 'disarmed' the guy sprinting with the knife. C'mon. Do tell.

Oh look! 9 cops controlling one guy! How do they do it???

Better increase funding to police! Those weren't medical health professionals!

Shooting a thug that's a credible risk ain't murder.

Ya wanna know what I'm sick of, they are paid to entertain, thats it! Nothing more. Protest on their own damn time, take a knee anytime after or before the national anthem. Professional athletes and actors that live in their own little millionaire bubbles. They are pay to play, not paid to protest. End of line...

Every American has a right to protest, why are you against that? Who cares what job they have, they have the same rights as every American.

Now to your point.

They are paid to do so much more than play, that is a watered down simple way to denigrate the players.

As if they don't have rules and regulations for before and after games, off seasons, etc.

They are using their platform, and it made you look, and it made you talk about it with me. So they are effectively protesting.

You are just mad, and hating.

The "take a knee" protest was invented by a veteran.

I want to see you protest at your job, go ahead, see what stupid prize you win. Lol. They are paid to promote their franchise and play a game. I doubt protesting is in their contracts.

And... Guess what, I didn't look. I heard about it on the news, and made a #1, say it with me, top of the politics thread meme, to make fun of them. I won't watch a single game or them making complete fools of themselves. Wearing the name of a rapist on thier helmets... and supporting a communist group like BLM, it's amazing that the NFL makes any kind of money. Proves they have no idea who or what they are supporting because they are too dumb to research anything..

And wrong again racist, can I call you that? Seems fitting since you forgot about Tim Tebow, the original kneeler. Only he knelt for god. Which is fine in my book, just not during the national anthem..

You sound like Biden, stealing credit for everyone else's accomplishments. Crappernick took a knee because he sucked and was about to lose his contract. He was so oppressed, white parents, adopted... ya tell me his sad sad story please... Typical libtard responses.

I served my country bro. I know what that flag stands for. And any traitor that says kneel for the national anthem should be deported and citizenship stripped. Now be a good boy and run back to mommies basement and prepare yourself for 4 more years of Trump. I heard kleenex is on sale.

Oh so white man Tebow can kneel and bring God into football, but keep civil rights out of it? Double-standards much? Are you seriously advocating for taking away a natural-born citizen's residency status as an American for wanting to kneel during the national anthem? Are you that Trump deranged that you think anyone has the right to do that to another American for such a ridiculous reason? It was a vet who suggested kneeling in the first place. Meanwhile in February Trump cut $3.8 billion from the military budget to fund his wall and he calls the fallen a bunch of losers. But you're still sucking the sh*t out of his ass? What a cuck.

Looks like he directly responded to your question to BN. He did the same with his Maui Onion account. Troi does seem to be a little smarter, more reasonableand not cry about muh white supremacists every 2nd post but I dunno.

bitch please, you guess wrong and are using racist tropes.

Your momma raise you to act like that? She proud of you for jumping to conclusions and making an ass of your self?

Were you personally offended by the cuck word?

Or is this just a Trump simp thing?

Are you mixing up alts again, Maui Onion?

I was aware.

You are a Trump simp trying to get a rise out of someone you think is alone.

They aren't alone.

I didn't expect them to double down and disrespect our veterans. I bet they don't even know the flag code.

If they learned their rules and regulations, they might know that kneeling isn't disrespectful, but they are too busy clutching pearls and feigning outrage.

If you notice, I said not during the anthem. So no double standard there. So what if it was a vet who suggested it, he is a traitor as well.. meanwhile trump gave soldiers the highest raises 3x during his presidency, but ya, took 3.8 billion in unappropriated funds to build the wall, that's not anything, thats smart. Any more facts you want to twist to fit your narrative? Misinformed as usual, but go ahead, tell more lies.

calling veterans traitors for peaceful protest is shameful. Shame on you

4 more years... come on, say it with me. Does that make you want to cry? Awww
..

4 more years, does that make you happy?

No? It wasn't everything you wanted? It changed nothing? Too bad.

I guess just writing something doesn't make it happen.

Who knew you couldn't just make up reality?

Adults. Adults knew

Protesting is a right. Deal with it.

So much for defending the constitution.

95% peaceful protests according to the U.S. Crisis Monitor.

Taking a knee is peaceful...

Blue Ninny pictured an antifa rioter.

Lol that's what I thought. No real response. Later hater.

Still here thinking about that effective protest I see

You have freedom of speech. But you can't make anyone else listen. They have that right. Which is what my post was about. Speak all you want - or fall over in a forest. Either way, I won't be there to listen.

NFL players made you listen.

here we are talking about what you heared

Yep, I told these cucks before that Kaepernick's protest was effective because it got everyone talking, all the way up to POTUS. They're just salty because white supremacy.

Successful protest has us all chatting police violence

Great job successfully protesting buildings not being burned down and windows not being smashed with your childlike tantrums.

I wasn't aware there was systemic government violence against buildings. You must be cutting edge reporting!

Wow, you're a real clever one...

We all see the violence you dems create. Thanks for pushing centrists away from Hidin' Biden.

I have some rocks smarter than him. He denies riots and calls them peaceful protests. His CNN antenna is full tuned.

95% peaceful protests.

Source: U.S. Crisis Monitor

Fake news about mass violence is fake.

Hahahaha yeah, only over a billion dollars of damage.

Hey, 99.9% of cops don't shoot unarmed blacks.

I see you have no sources as usual, for your disinformation and bullshit

Only about 12 unarmed blacks got shot by police in 2019, so you figure it out, Einstein.

Right, I ask for a source, you talk more shit.

You love your disinformation, I love my information backed by sources. Sooo...

https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race/

Oh look, black people are killed more often by police. Facts is facts

Nice deflection, f**ktard. I said unarmed blacks. Yet you post something that shows more whites are killed by cops then blacks. You reeeaaallly want to get into the overrepresentation debate? Guess what f**ktard? When a group that consists of 13% murders over 50% of all murder totals, they're going to come into more contact with cops.

I read the bit you posted, and it proves my point. Anyone that can read that spreadsheet can see the problem.

I showed the number of killed and the rate, it proves my point too.

did you copy paste this from your other comment, and just add a bit about fethering kids?

Lazy, low effort slander is low effort

That is some higher effort slander.

it is when it is a peaceful protest.

Which none of the things you listed are, ya straw man building fop of a dandyman

U.S. Crisis Monitor lists their methodology. It was measured.

https://acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations-political-violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/

They are an employee, nothing more. They are using their employer's time to throw their tantrum.

You keep saying that, it doesn't make it true.

They are sports stars. They are paid for being present. Benched players still get payed.

You are wrong, and arguing for no reason.

Players do more than play.

But are not hired to whine and throw tantrums about fake social issues on company time. You’re looking like a fool.

The social issues aren't fake, but your name is.

Nothing rational about you, painfully obvious after a conversation.

The social issues aren't fake.

Sports stars aren't normal employees, they don't get paid ONLY to play. They are paid to be in post game interviews, paid to be in off season training, sometimes paid to sit on the bench all season.

It is rational to defend the players and their right to protest before a game begins.

Deal with it.

Lol, and yet you never once mention what they are protesting.

You're a disingenuous rhetoric hawker

blah blah blah, still didn't see you mention what is being protested.

I see you making a false claim that there is no systemic racism. Which is mind blowing. Have some evidence.

https://www.businessinsider.com/us-systemic-racism-in-charts-graphs-data-2020-6

Then Nate Boyer brought disgrace to his service record. John Kerry served too, but was a waste of space. Tim McVeigh served too... Service in the military doesn't give you carte blanche for every heinous thing you do afterwards.

You keep denigrating service members. Gross

Nope. Denigrating his actions unrelated to his service. You’re holding up his service record as a pass for him to be right in his wrong doing and betrayal. Sad.

Peaceful orotest is a right for every American. You are calling people traitors for exercising their rights.

You are in fact watering down accusations of treason.

Pull up your boots and act like a man, stop sniveling about protests.

Never called it treason. Not once. You’re sniveling about fans protesting the moronic protests of players and disrespect of our country. If players protest on their own time then fine. Would not care. But not during their job. Common sense.

Yeah, I conflated you and StevenC2

The player protest is effective.

Protesting isn't polite, but it is a right

listing a service member by name, then calling them a waste of space over political differences, is denigrating a service member.

Do you even know what a sgraw man is? Go read a link or something, because it isn't accurately describing what someone has done.

John Kerry is not a waste of space.

Nate Boyer is an American patriot, the protest follows all United States code.

You keep trying though.

If every American has the right to protest, what's the problem with fans protesting? Can you not see the contradiction and hypocrisy here?

Every American has the right to protest

Players protest for civil rights

"Fans" protest against players right to protest for civil rights

The "fans" have a right to protest, they look stupid protesting someone else's rights, but they are allowed to do it.

The problem, isn't a legal problem. The problem is that people who protest against civil rights are shit.

You are assuming that they are protesting the players right to protest for civil rights. What If they are protesting the invasion of sports by politics?

The "fans" are literally protesting against the right to protest before a game.

The "fans" are effectively protesting the player's protest for civil rights. If you think civil rights are political.

The fans are protesting the invasion of sports by politics. If the players protest outside of the game that fans have paid to see, there would be no issue. The fans have paid to watch a football game, not watch players express their political beliefs.

The protest occurs before the game, not during.

What is the hearsay, that this is the exception to the rule for?

The players have a declared protest.

The "fans" have a declared protest.

The "fans" are protesting the player protest.

The players are protesting police brutality.

The "fans" have this right.

So do the players.

There is no hearsay to except into the argument. TFIWWY?