I have written a more detailed summary in the comment section of this meme

There are a handful of MODs who manipulate the rules to suit their political views (and everything is political now, even morality issues). A meme that smears Trump will get featured in the Fun stream, a meme that mocks liberals will never be allowed in the Fun stream. Some MODs will hold effective memes until viewers are limited (time of day) then approve so no one sees the meme. Perversion is permissible due to a political party that seeks power by advocating that everyone has a constitutional right to orgasm in any form they chose be it pedophilia or beastiality or any other possible combination. Hang in there Toby, every good fight is worth fighting. You know you are over the target when this group of pervs start howling.

Well the Democrats under BHO passed bullshit allowing men to use women's locker rooms, changing rooms, bathrooms etc. and vice versa. When my 4 year old grand daughter goes into a women's restroom and is followed in by a man, I don't trust that mother f**ker to just be expressing his gender preference. Does that qualify as perverse?

For the record, I received a stirring round of applause when I followed the confused he/she/it in and removed him/her with an unauthorized choke hold. There has to a line beyond which people don't cross.

Some applicable Communist Party Goals 1963
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

It's from the 1958- 45 Communist Party Goals written into the Congressional record in 1963 and repeated on the here now today Commmyunist Party website ( or at least a modern version of it). You don't have to think anything. Path of least resistance, Marxist's love people like that.
Octavia, if you are an honest seeker of the truth, and I believe you are, do a google search for Yuri Bezmenov. He assumed the name Tomas Schuman to avoid the KGB. He defected to Canada from the KGB in the 70's. When he had to order the murder of sincere communists in India where he was stationed he said "enough". There are several videos on youtube- every one I've watched is fascinating. There is one I can't find for a link that is a 53 minute college type lecture that sums it up very well. I'll throw it out, it's up to you to check my accuracy and this is one source that I think is honest and balanced.

Uh, damn straight. This clown had evil intentions. There is no constitutional right to evil, there is a constitutional right to protect people we love from evil.

I'm not going to go into the fact the perv was trying to get into my grand daughter's stall with his junk in hand OKAY? SO what the f**k do you consider reprehensible?

Oh my, far be it from me to think I can prevent someone from exercising his constitutional rights to jerk off in front of 4 year old girls.

I can't reply to your last comment, due to imgflip set up so I'll add on to this one, but 1, why should a man have to stand in a women's bathroom to insure the safety of his grand daughters? Two, your data is wrong on attacks, it's not PC to be honest about them. Not every situation is reported or acted on by law enforcement. The alphabet crowd may not think they are demanding superior rights over others, but that is the net effect.
How do I know which tranny is safe and which one is not? How do I identify as 100% male and not infringe on the right to privacy of any other women in that restroom? Privacy? Destroyed by asserting a right that shouldn't exist. If tranny's want to use any restroom, then they should build businesses and facilities where they can do that. Worked for gay bars.
General public facilities should have been left alone. This isn't about a "right" or "protections", this is about telling half the population to go to hell. We'll either do things your way or we'll pay for it, our principles, traditions and moral structures can go to hell. If we say no, look at the repercussions we face. Our values are supposed to be divisive, destructive, hateful. But someone with with a fluid identity of their sex is as pure as the wind driven snow.
I said I wouldn't go into details here, and I won't. I should have killed the guy, but I showed restraint. And I'm a feeble old man.

All ties into Goals 24, 25 and 26. Blur the clear moral lines, then how do you call anyone a predator? If someone identifies as something not indicated by their chromosomes, then is normalized by allowing them to shower anywhere (as an example) use any bathroom, etc, then assume they all have innocent intentions, how do you protect the most vulnerable? The answer is you don't. To conform with this thinking, I have to forfeit the security of my grand daughters as I stand outside the restroom hoping the tranny who just walked in isn't a predator. Equality is then crushed as the deviant assumes more rights than the normal. This is a devious means to destroy, not just individuals, but our nation. The Soviets designed this, they infiltrated every aspect of leadership in our country, have implemented their plan and now just wait for the "statue" to be pulled down. Too many people think the USSR lost the cold war, that was really a tactical move that opened them up to free access to US capital and technology. Not my words, theirs.

"and everything is political now, even morality issues"

The appropriate government role in moderating morality has been a political issue since about the Roman Emperor Augustus.

Wait, no, I'm wrong, the ancient Athenians had to deal with these issues as well. Wait, no, I think it goes back to the Zhou Dynasty.

You know what, it's ALWAYS been a thing, for Christ's sakes.

I believe that imgflip is beginning to lose its way. I was censored and threatened with having my account terminated after submitting a meme highlighting a proven fact concerning pedophilia. It was censored for "homophobia" (a cretinous newspeak word). I did not all intend on that meme being perceived as anti-homosexual. On the contrary, I support homosexual civil unions. Today, a 5 month old meme of mine was censored for "transphobia" (another cretinous newspeak word). It featured an article criticising pedophilia. I did not intend on that meme being perceived as anti-transgender. I did not even criticise transgenders in that meme. It merely involved a transgender individual that I suspected was a pedophile. I fail to see how that meme violated the imgflip ToU in any way whatsoever. Is imgflip defending pedophiles, and disguising this as support for homosexuals and transgenders? I have reason to believe that imgflip is also defending anti-Abrahamics. The user synthetic-Mantis has frequently posted blatantly anti-Abrahamic content. Nothing has been done. So imgflip is fine with synthetic-Mantis violating the ToU, but angry at me for obeying the ToU? What hypocrisy! I believe that the imgflip ToU needs to be reformed, but if they don't reform it, they could at least be consistent in following the current one.

Here is my suggestion: all imgflip users should be required to enter their age. Content deemed inappropriate for minors (eg. anti-Abrahamic comments) should be hidden from users aged 13-17. It is like the NSFW button is permanently switched on for minors, but for both memes and comments. For adult users, there should be no censorship, apart from illegal content, of course. So users like synthetic-Mantis should not be banned, but the anti-Abrahamic content he posts should be hidden from minors. This could make imgflip both family friendly and pro-free speech.

I don't know what to tell you - your conduct is absolutely appalling and everyone sees the way you treat other users. I really don't believe your protests of innocence. I honestly don't.

How many times have other users told you that you're too quick to link homosexuality to pedophilia without evidence? How many times have users told you that you're too quick to link transgenderism to pedophilia without evidence? Are we supposed to be surprised that the mods have been finding issues with your memes?

There have times when you posted to me and I've been like "I'm surprised the mods let him get away with that one". Well... Maybe they spoiled you. Maybe you're so used to getting your own way around here that you're not actually used to the rules getting enforced on you.

Guess what I diagnose you as?

How is my conduct "appalling"? What have I done that has violated the ToU? Do you support this unfair censorship? Do you want everyone who disagrees with you to be censored?

This very page right here has EVERYTHING that's wrong with your behavior! You're calling people pedophile supporters for NO other reason than because they're picking your arguments apart - and then you cry these crocodile tears claiming you're being censored for disagreeing with the mods.

Spare me. You get NO sympathy from me. None. People give you a solid argument and you just attack, but now you want me to feel sorry for you because YOU'RE the victim?

Guess what I diagnose you as?

Rough day, huh?

And the mods have taken your stuff down? Really? Shocking.

Indeed.

Nice selfie.

Did you see this?

"JRBobDobbs1 up, 20h, 1 reply
Who's a pedophile?

replyflagTobyThePug0 ups, 20h, 1 reply
You and momo_yaoyorozu, I suspect. I think Octavia_Melody may also be one."

If it was 20 hours ago, I would have missed it, sorry - been busy - but I've seen him say shit like that so many times.

You found something more productive to do than engage with this loonery? Very wise. ;)

I use imgflip to destress.

Yes, dealing with imgflip is less stressful than my job. These idiots think they're the worst - they're just practice.

Same.

Haha! I know, they are always so pleased with themselves when they think they've had some kind of emotional impact, most of them clearly just need to get laid.

I can't imagine arguing in favor of a belief system that's liable to turn you into an envious, repressed bigot, screaming abuse at all the people having more fun than you because they're not following the rules in your dusty old book.

I suppose they've got to think they are offending us, what else have they got?*

*Other than a wife, 22 kids and a gun, obviously.

I don't mind taking the heat in lieu of them getting laid. I'm all in favor of a general increase in quality control across human sexuality. Let people who are bad at it post memes complaining about the world - everybody wins this way.

where was this?

Well you have frequently defended pedophiles stripping and twerking in front of young children.

Perhaps you are not a pedophile, but why should I trust you? After all, you are a satanist, and you hate religions that teach love and forgiveness. The reason I suspect you and JRBobDobbs may be pedophiles is because both of you have defended showing young children nudity and sexual acts. I noticed that you deleted some of those comments, so perhaps you have changed your mind? But you still watch young girls' TV shows, which is suspicious to say the least.

"No one can make you trust them. All I can do is provide facts."

*opinions

"No I'm not"

You criticise Christianity every chance you get, but as soon as satanism is brought up, you express your support for it. You're either a satanist or a troll.

"No, I hate religions. Teaching love and forgiveness is fine."

You hate religions that teach love and forgiveness, so clearly it isn't fine to you.

"I don't recall ever doing that, and I don't recall him ever doing that."

The proof is right here in this very comment section. Are you choosing to ignore it, or are you really that blind?

"That has nothing to do with young girls and it has everything to do with the show itself."

lol you like a little girls' TV show 😂

No, I haven't. I have quite clearly said that pedophiles shouldn't be anywhere near children. I realize that that isn't going to stop you making up whatever sick lies you like about other users. You just called Octavia and I pedophiles, of course you are going to argue that I also think they should be near kids.

You sound like you are starting to panic now, you have no sensible argument and you are terrified of a changing society that you don't understand. You're like a sad old man who's escaped from a care home, continuing to thrash and fight against perceived enemies despite knowing deep down that it'll do him no good.

You got nothing left, have you?

Your spurious accusations and ridiculous claims are the figurative equivalent to you picking up whatever is in reach and throwing it at the sane people around you.

A tragic, last ditch effort to hang on to a reality you still believe exists and can be preserved.

Aw, look at your little confused face. *shhhhh* everything is gonna be okay. Put the water jug down.

You're weird

"Here is my suggestion: all imgflip users should be required to enter their age"

lmfao that won't backfire at all. nope. everyone on the internet is very honest, especially on imgflip. everyone on 4chan is over 18. i'm sure of it because there are age filters everywhere.

"For adult users, there should be no censorship"

basically you're advocating to turn imgflip into youtube.

"So users like synthetic-Mantis should not be banned, but the anti-Abrahamic content he posts should be hidden from minors."

ok, sure, but idk how kids are supposed to find me. i mean-- why and how the f**k are they gonna go to the bottom of an m/politics meme (when there's so much better content to browse outside the shitshow of politics), click the low rated comments, find my account, and see my weird obscure israel shit?

"This could make imgflip both family friendly and pro-free speech."

lmfao censorship of any kind is not """"pro-free speech""""

so, all this ramble about how imgflip censorship is bad has suddenly turned into a moral grandstand about protecting children from anti-israel stuff.. with censorship.. and i'm somewhat of a centerpiece to this entire rant? wha-- i-- there is no consistency to this. what are your ideals exactly? after making excuses for my account to be deleted, you spam 12 different meme streams about how it's to protect the children?
4a8xvp.jpg (click to show)

f**k off man. esp after you called a minor a "pedophile." idk if you're disingenuous or just plain dumb. i know it's possible you've toned down from the ambition of deleting my account to censoring me from minors, but it looks like you're trying to paint yourself as the good guy after what we've seen of your caliber on the site.

"lmfao that won't backfire at all. nope. everyone on the internet is very honest, especially on imgflip. everyone on 4chan is over 18. i'm sure of it because there are age filters everywhere."

I'm just saying it will reduce the likelihood of minors viewing inappropriate content.

"ok, sure, but idk how kids are supposed to find me. i mean-- why and how the f**k are they gonna go to the bottom of an m/politics meme (when there's so much better content to browse outside the shitshow of politics), click the low rated comments, find my account, and see my weird obscure israel shit?"

Again, I'm just saying it will reduce the likelihood of minors viewing inappropriate content.

"lmfao censorship of any kind is not """"pro-free speech"""""

So it is okay to upload child pornography to imgflip because that is "pro-free speech". Lines still need to be drawn where necessary.

"f**k off man. esp after you called a minor a "pedophile." idk if you're disingenuous or just plain dumb. i know it's possible you've toned down from the ambition of deleting my account to censoring me from minors, but it looks like you're trying to paint yourself as the good guy after what we've seen of your caliber on the site."

Looks like somebody's triggered.

"So it is okay to upload child pornography to imgflip because that is "pro-free speech". Lines still need to be drawn where necessary."

free speech doesn't hurt anyone in the process (apart from those offended), whereas child pornography does. comparing regular free speech to child porn is a new low for you :)

"Looks like somebody's triggered"

eyyy you might want to work on developing better responses, mate.

"free speech doesn't hurt anyone in the process (apart from those offended), whereas child pornography does. comparing regular free speech to child porn is a new low for you :)"

Says imgflip's most infamous anti-Abrahamic :)

"eyyy you might want to work on developing better responses, mate."

Yours aren't exactly Shakespeare, mate.

"Says imgflip's most infamous anti-Abrahamic"

anyone would have to be a special kind of stupid to be offended by my posts.

"Yours aren't exactly Shakespeare, mate"

this is imgflip. don't expect any shakespeares off of imgflip of all places. i never said i was shakespeare, but i usually at least try to rebuke what my opponent is offering me. you don't.

"anyone would have to be a special kind of stupid to be offended by my posts."

Agreed.

"i usually at least try to rebuke what my opponent is offering me. you don't."

Whatever you want to tell yourself.

It would be interesting to know if our Leftist friends are flagging your content and that is the reason you are being censured. I don't know if this is even true, but it would be like them to silence voices they don't like.

Flagging content doesn't do anything if there's nothing that violates the Terms of Service anyway. That's why it takes such a long time to get the mods to react to a Purgeboy meme even when it's obvious that he's about five minutes away from posting death threats. Try flagging one of my memes and notice that nothing comes of it.

Oh, I'm sure I've been flagged many times. This will be hard to believe but did you know that some people here don't like me? 😂

It definitely should be age restricted! Do you want children viewing comments that say "kill al Jews, Christians and Muslims"? It is bad enough that you want children to watch drag queens.

I've noticed in all your fearmongering about drag queens that you never mention drag kings, does your lack of hysterics about them mean you don't have a problem with them?

You also never mention female drag queens, do they also send you into an apoplectic 'think of the children' rage?

Anyone who wants to strip and twerk in front of young children should not be allowed near them.

"It is bad enough that you want children to watch drag queens."

In case they see someone fall in heels and are traumatized?

In case they learn that it's ok to express yourself?

In case they learn that drag queens are just people and that there's no need to vilify them?

It's harder to hate people if they are being friendly, right?

Children are too young for that sick stuff. You really need to know where to draw the line. If "expressing yourself" means stripping, flashing and twerking in front of children, then I am definitely opposed to it. You are quite literally defending the exposure of young children to sexual content. You are defending pedophiles yet again.

Reading a children's book is not stripping.

Get a grip.

https://www.newswars.com/disturbing-video-drag-queen-strips-for-kids-in-library/

https://summit.news/2019/10/30/drag-queen-flashes-children-during-story-hour/

https://newspunch.com/drag-queen-teaching-kids-twerk-move-bum-up-down/

I looked at your link, there's no footage of anyone stripping, just a mash up of clips of people dancing, reading stories to kids and right-wing presenters screaming about what the world has come to.

There's brief mention of one drag queen being a pedophile, are you able to understand that they are not a pedophile BECAUSE they are a drag queen?

Any adult with access to kids could be a pedophile, as soon as it was discovered he was dealt with.

Your second link- "accidentally flashed children a glimpse of his crotch"

Because no other adult has ever done that before, ever.

Your third link-

This took place in a library, nobody made anybody take their kids. If you think kids dancing is sexual, that's on you. They are oblivious to what it 'suggests'. Most women on tv and in music videos online dance like this. The parents that find that shocking and sinful probably aren't the ones taking their kids to drag queen storytime at the local library. ;)

"Twerking, of course, is the craze of bending over in a sexually suggestive way and shaking one’s rear, often on a dance floor. It was popularized by stars like Miley Cyrus, who made it a signature part of her undeniably sex-themed music videos and performances."

They are not just pedophiles because they are drag queens; they are drag queens because they are pedophiles. Now quit defending pedophiles sexualising children, you sick creep.

"You don't need news articles to tell that drag queens are mentally unstable weirdos that shouldn't be around children."

Ohh are you one of these hardcore types who believes television is sinful and theatres are full of debauchery and filth? I genuinely wouldn't be surprised.

Drag queen: A drag queen is a person, usually male, who uses drag clothing and makeup to imitate and often exaggerate female gender signifiers and gender roles for entertainment purposes.

"We're born naked, and the rest is drag."-RuPaul

"Ohh are you one of these hardcore types who believes television is sinful and theatres are full of debauchery and filth?"

What twisted logic made you come to that bizarre conclusion?

You are using the plural, yet you shared one story of one drag queen who was discovered to be a pedophile. Where all all the other stories?

You don't need news articles to tell that drag queens are mentally unstable weirdos that shouldn't be around children.

Indeed, I do wonder why I am censored. I did nothing wrong.

The only 'kill all' comments I've seen on here are made by Purgeboy and his nonsense is quite definitely not directed towards white people.

I can't recall seeing you say anything about it. Presumably you are fine with young children witnessing that?

I barely even know who this "Purgeboy" character is. And you are the one who is fine with young children witnessing drag queens stripping, flashing and twerking. That is just sick. You are quite literally defending the exposure of young children to sexual content. You are defending pedophiles yet again.

"And you are the one who is fine with young children witnessing drag queens stripping, flashing and twerking"

More baseless accusations, that's clearly all you have.

https://www.newswars.com/disturbing-video-drag-queen-strips-for-kids-in-library/

https://summit.news/2019/10/30/drag-queen-flashes-children-during-story-hour/

https://newspunch.com/drag-queen-teaching-kids-twerk-move-bum-up-down/

oh look. TobytheSmug, spammer of the same meme, supporter of israel, open attacker of other users is complaining about censorship. :)

and oh dear, oh dear... it's somehow gotten worse than chosanwan...

"I did not all intend on that meme being perceived as anti-homosexual."

judging from the wording on that meme... oh boy :)

"On the contrary, I support homosexual civil unions"

lmfao the damage control

"It merely involved a transgender individual that I suspected was a pedophile"

was that the user momo_yaoyorozu? i found their profile from users quoting some of your comments. that user's not a pedophile; they seem like an actual minor, judging from some of the streams they follow. idk what the meme was about, but accusing a kid of being a pedo is f**king sick. and you're acting like the moral grandstander here.

"Is imgflip defending pedophiles, and disguising this as support for homosexuals and transgenders?"

if that were the case, so many users would be complaining about this.

"I have reason to believe that imgflip is also defending anti-Abrahamics."

hmm that's very specific of imgflip. i wonder what inspired you to write this elegant rant

"The user synthetic-Mantis has frequently posted blatantly anti-Abrahamic content."

i think i diagnose you with something which you often mention, but i can't remember what the word for it is... maybe you could help me remember?

"So imgflip is fine with synthetic-Mantis violating the ToU, but angry at me for obeying the ToU?"

exactly. not only that, but i have every imgflip mod taking my orders, and i'm controlling them like the puppet master. you can never stop me mwahahahahahaha :)

jokes aside, of course the person who calls a person a "pedophile" is gonna have questionable content. the "pedophile" slander is so powerful, it makes "racist" look like a compliment.

Begone, triggered anti-Abrahamic :)

your ass was trigg'd before i even entered the thread lmfao :)