The story behind this already-classic meme. tl;dr: Don't trust the narrative that a single photo suggests.

Ahh, so you have no problem with memes based on racial stereotypes. Good to know.

If they were liberals, and BLM supporters(!) as their scummy lawyer now claims — outstanding move! — they weren’t very good ones

There are more effective ways of showing support for BLM than brandishing guns in the faces of BLM protestors

Gee, maybe there's a better way to show support for the terrorist communist group blm than burning looting and murdering, no?

But I suppose being a cuck blm supporter means you can't protect yourself from large mobs breaking into your neighborhood nor your property. You do you, everyone else won't be a pathetic cuck who won't defend their families regardless how many times you try to shame them as a Karen or Ken with your race baiting.

Haaaaaaaaaaah

You cannot attribute the violence of fringe opportunists to this movement any more than you can blame MLK for the Black Panthers.

Or: You can keep trucking with that, it’s a free country.

Are you talking about the BLM organization that is openly Marxist or are you talking about the general movement that values the lives of black people when it comes to interactions with police (but not abortions, black on black crime, etc...etc...). You have to make a distinction here.

No, they are not.

Source?

"lokiare

a 'well regulated militia' in that day meant every able bodied male above the age of 16 that was trained to wield a firearm.
Personally I'd love for the government to provide free classes on how to use firearms so that the 'militia' aka the people were 'well regulated' or in modern English well trained."

False. The US couldn't afford an army. Heck, they couldn't even afford to make money itself. Training wasn't an option.

"Well regulated militia" in that day meant that every able bodied male above the age of 16 had to supply their own working firearm for their own use when conscripted and had to be well versed in using them, "well regulated" referring to it in working condition and knowing how to use it.

Your comment is a mess. I'm not sure what you are trying to express there.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/militia see definition #2. That's the original.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_(United_States) as a reference.

Nice deflection, as always, to accompany your lies.

Perhaps you need an app to remind you of this: For the nth time, I DO NOT do links.

A copy of the original was posted above, with two lines added to explain it to the idiots who quote only half of the 2nd A.

You're obviously a DrStrangeFate troll alt.

Ah ok so you cover your ears when someone speaks the truth. I get it now. Also not an alt.

What truth?

"I don't do links" Sorry, that's how we get sources and how we compare facts. If you don't do that your basically not part of the conversation.

Want to show support for BLM but find yourself reaching for the trigger instead?

Try this yardsign — cheap, simple, effective!

Although it may depreciate your home value and make you look like one of the riff-raff.

This message brought to you by the Homeowners’ Association of Not Being A Dick.

One day all minorities will worship his greatness, or so he thinks lmao

eww. cooties,,,

Imagine the Covid-89 spread!

With her, that'd be the least of their worries,,,

Yeah, Ebola kills much quicker.

Who knows what contact with her 'nether regions' might spread,,,

I call her's the 'neither regions'. Imagine the horrid, withering stench of apocalypse.

The fetid stink of pathogens unbound,,,

Like rotten shrimp on the barbee.

You haven’t even established that “ANTIFA“ is a “terrorist organization,” or even much of an organization at all

Fun fact: “ANTIFA” has never even been accused of killing anyone, unlike the KKK, which is not a designated terrorist organization: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.wbur.org/hereandnow/2020/06/11/what-is-antifa-trump-protests

Let alone BLM!

Anywho: Google “are BLM terrorists?” and surprise surprise, you’ll find that “people are saying” that

“People are saying” lots of things these days!

But if you are committed to fact and reason and impartial judgment as I know Timber1972 is deep down inside

Then I would suggest

Hold your horses

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Dayton_shooting antifa shooter

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_shooting_of_Dallas_police_officers blm shooter

When you say it’s a terror organization “by definition,” what definition are you using?

Duhhh, they use terror to try and accomplish their commie goals.

Dude, even Trump is not enough of a wingnut to try to claim BLM is a terror organization.

He’s politically astute enough to realize going that far off the deep end is not in his electoral advantage.

He will definitely keep the rhetoric focused on “looters,” “rioters,” etc. as a major campaign theme, but I doubt he will try to draw this connection. Even in his typical “I’m just gonna toss this terrorist accusation out there and not actually follow it through to its logical conclusion” type-way.

Trump did let the “treason” accusation against BLM fly the other day though, so who knows.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-lashes-out-at-black-lives-matter-accuses-one-member-of-treason/2020/06/25/45667ec8-b70f-11ea-a510-55bf26485c93_story.html%3foutputType=amp

See my other comment in this thread re: ANTIFA, etc.

Kylie, they openly say they are marxists that want black dominance over whites. You need to study the group itself.
They are an organization with plans and goals. Look at their website.
https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/ some quotes:
"We are self-reflexive and do the work required to dismantle cisgender privilege and uplift Black trans folk, especially Black trans women who continue to be disproportionately impacted by trans-antagonistic violence."
"We build a space that affirms Black women and is free from sexism, misogyny, and environments in which men are centered."
"We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work."
So they openly admit they are sexist and genderist.

No, they don't, which is why you haven't quoted them saying so,,,

The concept of doxxing plays an interesting role in this story, and specifically, the protestors’ decision to march on the mayor’s home

But I won’t spoil the fun for you

The saga continues: Follow along here!

imgflip.com/i/47buch

I’m sure you would

Lawyers are a "race"?

You're not very swift, are you? Oh right, a leftist doesn't know what a meme is.

As if you do? Just talking shit about leftists isn't a meme.

Doesn’t alter any self-defense rights that they did (or didn’t) have

But does tend to show that this is the Karen & Ken couple from hell

Check also their history of litigation and disputes with the HOA

Interesting stuff man

Interesting stuff

They don’t deserve to be robbed, but nor do they get to brandish guns in the faces of peaceful protestors

In my opinion!

You can criticize these folks as a person without a red cent to your name; or as a financial peer, as indeed several dozen of their neighbors who signed an open letter condemning their conduct just did

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.kmov.com/news/mccloskey-condemn-neighbors-letter-gun-st-louis/article_6107683c-bc13-11ea-a3d4-2f87860c3f2f.amp.html

In a world full of ignoramuses supporting this couple, it doesn’t matter to me how you get to yes

Huh that’s interesting, 2016 Missouri Revised Statutes takes a different view

Perhaps you have stumbled across something key that legislators and lawyers in the state of Missouri and across the country have simply missed for decades

I would suggest you go straight to the Supreme Court of the United States and correct this injustice

5-4 conservative majority so I favor your odds

The 14th amendment says: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;"
That means States can't take away our 2nd amendment rights thank you.

When the 2nd amendment was made, there weren't any automatic weapons, or school shootings, or police brutality. Back then, you could only shoot a gun once before it had to be reloaded.

Whadya mean there wasn't any police brutality? It's nothing new.
Who needs an automatic weapon? *loads canon with grapeshot*
No school shootings? https://www.seeker.com/mass-shootings-have-long-history-1766324673.html
Ok that last part is true to the best of my knowledge

Do you think the LA shooting could have happened if the guy had a musket?

Take it to the Supreme Court, counselor

You forgot part of it.

a 'well regulated militia' in that day meant every able bodied male above the age of 16 that was trained to wield a firearm.
Personally I'd love for the government to provide free classes on how to use firearms so that the 'militia' aka the people were 'well regulated' or in modern English well trained.

Where's the copy pasta?