"There Are No White People In The Bible"

Still gonna read it, atheist puke.

What your point?

To inspire contemplation.

You thought about it enough to leave a comment.

Who really gives a shit what "color" anyone is?

Except racist sons of bitches.

The name Adam is rooted in Hebrew word 119, which means "to show blood (in the face)". We know that this is an accurate translation because the Hebrew word for blood (H1818) is "dam".
Every time you see the word "ruddy", which is generally accompanied by the word "white" (Songs 5:10, Lamentations 4:7), it means a clear, rosy complexion - like Nicolaus Sandmann. The kid who sued CNN for the false narrative they ran against him.

What an incredibly insensitive, inflammatory and racist statement.
Just what one would expect from a Godless, post modern Progressive.
Showing how compassion, understanding and civility are beyond them.

This is why the rest of us civilized people show you the utter contempt you so richly deserve.

Civilized people don't exhibit utter contempt.

"Utter contempt" is a characteristic of uncivilized people and barbarians.

Here's how Jesus put it in Matthew, Chapter 5:

Love for Enemies
43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[a] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that?

Like Baldie is any different?

Yes, Archiballs is different because he uses this as a means to route people to his blog which gets "millions" of hits a day, hence his need to linkbait it.

btw, he also posts stuff ridiculing memers from here a la Kyle.

Fair enough.

How surprising. Remember DJ Foxtard's reddit page?

Oh yeah, that too. I'm faymuss.

Is that little fartbag still around? I forgot his new name.

MadTitan.

When that profile started, he was asking me for that furry pic! I said, "Look in your top drawer, you DREW that."

Syd then made this great gif with it flushing down the toilet!

I route people to my blog because I am a knowledgeable, trustworthy, accomplished person who understands The Scientific Method and the requirements of "intellectual rigor."

If you spent more time on my blog, you might learn something outside the rapidly decaying orbit of Trump Cult nonsense.

Same one. It's easy to find gifs.

B b b but his blog says different!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I was gonna point that out to OM and AArchie, that the links to his stupid blog aren't even connected to the subject, other than a word.

Let me guess. That word being 'shit'?

Well I meant a word as in one of his links mentioning "Israel" but it's about the wall they built to keep out terrorists, but shit will do because apparantly that's what Mr Scientificalted has been doing while consulting his blog's vast readershit on a proper retort to my post.
I got a few maps and diagrams waiting to post since yesterday, I hadn't counted this blatantly racist moron ducking out quicker than someone having an episode of explosive diarrhea in their pants,,,

Here, learn something.

Liberals And Conservatives: How "Projection" and "The Psychological Shadow" Work
https://newsfrombarbaria.blogspot.com/2020/07/liberals-and-conservatives-how.html

Are you on drugs, you addled buffoon?

Seriously, who writes this stupid blog of yours and makes your memes, you mommy?
Because you are totally incapable of formulating an original sentence - let alone, rebuttal - here.

You know who else self deleted and came back?

Look at his page to see his replies to me - totally unrelated to the subject and to what I have posted.

I don't delete because my positions are well-researched and therefore sound.

"Pay no attention to that troll." Let me do that instead, in an obsessive a manner as possible.
Funny how you follow me all over the place on a daily basis. Psycho stalker.
And save my posts for 4 years in an archive. Nothing sick about that is there, folks.

The unicorn freak side show.

The contradiction you spotlight is typical of Trump Cult's need to rely on bogus sources like QAnon and the pronouncements of Malignant Messiah himself.

I knew John Kennedy Junior.

1.) He was what cultists would call a "libtard's libtard"

2.) Note well. John junior is not coming back. Nor did he reappear on The National Mall last Independence Day as prophesied by the trolls who manage QAnon's manipulative scam. https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/qanon-jfk-jr-conspiracy-theory-854938/

Yet you rely on your shitty blog lolololol

HAA!

Speaking of civilized people:

Donald Trump Comments On Jeffrey Epstein Consort, Ghislaine Maxell: "I Wish Her Well, Frankly."
https://newsfrombarbaria.blogspot.com/2020/07/donald-trump-comments-on-jeffrey.html

AKA: Hopefully the dems won't kill her like Epstein.

You're playing with fire, libtard. You're gonna get burned. May God have mercy on your soul.

He already has. Which is why you are the pile of miserable debris we see today.
And this is an example of the blasphemy I was talking about on the other post.

That is also stupid.

Hey, um, still waiting on your reply.

Define white people

Caucasian. People who inhabited Europe from the Caucasus mountains to the Atlantic Ocean.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasus_Mountains

You're an idiot.
Caucasions extend west to the Atlantic and east of the Caucasus all the way to Cental Asia and India, and unless you classify them by the newer racial categories of Melanisians or Dravidian, all the way to Australian Aboriginals.

Supply documentation. It is characteristic of right-wing ideologues that they simply assert whatever supports their ideological position without the rudimentary intellectual integrity of citing references.

Wha?

Also, you've misspelled "Caucasion."

The common definition of "Caucasian" is people occupying the Euopean land mass from the Caucasus mountains to the Atlantic Ocean.

Please defend your stated position that Caucasians (the term most commonly used as a synonym for "white people") extend all the way into India.

I understand the valid concept of "Indo-European," but I would like you to confirm your statement that Caucasian whites include residents of the Indian sub-continent.

To jog your memory, here is a photo of such people. https://matteovegetti.com/wp-content/gallery/indias/043-matteo-vegetti-nepal-group-of-women-talking.jpg

If you consider these people white, may I see your planetary papers?

And exactly when did the body snatchers leave a pod under your bed?

You seriously need to look up what you're babbling.

Ok so what race are Jews? Are they negroid, mongoloid or caucasoid?

No, Semitic is a LANGUAGE group. Some might argue ethnic but that's outdated.
Semitic is not a race, Jewish people are Caucasians and have never been considered to be anything but.

And please don't ask me to prove it, done it at least twice already - with this account and as Jack going three years back.

OOps, that sounded a bit itchy of me, shoulda redone that.
That AArchie (unitentionally) done set me off.
But I am an asshole.

It's that his memes true function is as a means to route people to his blog.
Plus he has posted posts from other memers there without their persmission and mocks them there.

Look at his replies, he posts a link to his blog that he keeps talking about, and the subject isn't even related other than for a word. Like in this case, for example, it'll be about something like politics in Israel and thus there's the link to ancient Judea (which is far closer to Caucasia than Europe is, unless you're including Russia bordering it)!

You seem to be smart enough not to be stupid enough as to dedicate your time and energy to squelching an well documented, informative, thoughtful blog operated by someone who believes Bill Clinton should suffer the full consequences of Law if he's proven to have participated in Epstein-Maxwell's sex abuse "ring."

I am also someone who urges Trump to bring indictment against Hillary which of course he won't do because he knows the indictment would crash-and-burn (like Kris Kobach's "voter fraud inquiry crashed-and-burned), thus depriving him of an exceptionally useful "whipping girl."

Tell me.

Why is it that Trump, after clamoring to lock Hillary up during the 2016 campaign, has decided to let a nefarious criminal like Hillary walk free on our streets?

Why haven't you asked this question yourself?

Are you -- or any of your right-wing friends -- "on the record" demanding that Trump-Barr indict Hillary?

Didn't think so.

Why is that?

As soon as there is actionable evidence against Bill or Hil, I DEMAND that Trump-Barr bring indictment against them.

Why is that?

Might it have something to do with prioritizing Justice over ideological butt-licking?

Good grief, you absolute idiot.

Wrong reply
to the
Wrong memer
on the
Wrong flippin' meme.

Scroll down and give me the rebuttal I've been waiting for three days, I've got a new asshole waiting to tear into you (with pretty pictures so even a clueless Dunn/Krug like yourself can understand. Maybe) as what I posted was only the intro.

Here you go.

Apply liberally (you should have no problem with that) all over yourself.

After all, you're a self-described asshole

Your idiocy, as usual, never ceases to cue in as expected.
We're on the same page here, but hey, what can anyone expect from an ignoramus like yourself?

Eloquent.

Wha? Wha??
I read your words, you absolute fool.

Waa-waa

So, in other words, you don't like it when I make a gratuitous comment on some comment you have made?
Ok, remember that the next time you have an urge to do so on one of my comments.

I was trying to be a little humorous...based on "OOps, that sounded a bit itchy of me,..." and the "But I am an asshole." comment you left above.

The "apply liberally (you should have no problem with that)" was because you are a wee bit liberal.

So,even you should be able to connect the dots and grock the humor intended.

But, then I have to remember...
We are both assholes.

I don't like wha? You can't understand what I typed, how tha frig you know what I feel?

Do you require an instruction manual with all your memes?

According to Genesis, Abraham, the founding Patriarch of the Israelites "came out of Ur" in southern Mesopotamia, a region that now lies in modern day Iraq.

The whole modern discussion and modern presumption (of many) that Jews are white people is a latter-day historical revision, a purely modern categorization.

These historicsl revisions have nothing to do with the southern Mesopotamian origin of the Jewish people, nor are they related to the ethno-genetic constituency of the Jewish people at the time of Jesus.

At the time of Jesus, the Romans (who generally welcomed conquered people into the Empire) despised the Jews the same way many "white people" in contemporary America look down on brown-skinned people like latinos and middle eastern Islamics.

To argue that the Jewish people in biblical times were white is tantamount to arguing that Muhammed and his Arab descendants -- the other great Semitic linguo-ethicity -- were white.

As whitness is commonly understood (and as whiteness is universally understood among conservative Christians), categorizing Jews and Arabs as white is a laughable construct, although I understand the a priori need to put ideology first and then bend the facts to fit.

Otherwise, these mendacious truth-warpers "lose their religion" and that loss, in the minds of people obsessed with personal salvation (and the inter-related need to avoid of "Hell") is perceived as a fate worse than death.

Here is the Encyclopedia Brittanica's article on Abraham of Ur. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Abraham

And here is an excellent article from the "Atlanta Jewish Times," discussing the latter-day transformation of "brown people" into "white people." https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.com/jews-white-complicated/

But note this curious datum:

None of my readers has mentioned the obvious fact that there were white people in the bible, including Pilate, Roman centurions and sundry other whites such as the wealthy Roman, Priscilla, instrumental in Christianity taking root across Caucasian Europe.

Genesiwha?
You go from German 19th Century revisionist theorizing which was later utilized by the Nazis to Judean mythology to verify it without actually trying to even seem to do so.

Mesopotamia is the recognized birthplace of civilization (although recent evidence also places Indus Valley Civilization beginning at 8000 years ago as well, and possibly farther back). It is also, ta da! the birthplace of Western Civilization. Look up on the map where Mesoptamia is located relative to Caucasia for funzies. The southern part of the mountains only happens to be in its north.

WHAT "ethno-genetic constituency"? You were asked this already by another.

The Romans, then as now, WERE "brown" - or what we might refer to as olive toned.
The problem they had with Jews and Christians was their refusal to have a shrine dedicated to the Roman Emperor in their home. All religions were allowed in the Empire, but homage to the Emperor was a requirement, even if it was token. Monotheism and no idols & graven images prohibited the practice with Jews & Christians. That's why they were fed to the lions for entertaiment purposes.

Whothafrig are your "readers"? What relevence does what they've not said have here?

You need to do your homework.

"Whothefrig are my readers?"

That would be you my friend.

You seek me out.

And you will read the following with keen interest.

"There Are No White People In The Bible" - "Jesus Died At The Hands Of Roman Police"
https://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2020/07/there-are-no-white-people-in-bible.html

No, I am not. I followed another memer's comments here.

You haven't even pretended to try to reply to what I posted, and that was only the intro.

Let's step this up, Mr Scientificalated.

I was going to mention the Romans but they were pretty minor characters, many of them unnamed. Hmm..there's a few Greeks too.

Your observation is accurate.

But it is also true that was a time in the United States when the whiteness of Italians was debated.

https://www.amazon.com/Are-Italians-White-Race-America-ebook/dp/B00AC2H8Q0

https://theundefeated.com/features/white-immigrants-werent-always-considered-white-and-acceptable/

Italians aren't exactly Romans though I don't see the difference being much of a consideration (northern Italians having a lot of Gaulish descent, introduction of North African genetics via rape by marauders).

If you don't mind sharing what is your intent behind this meme?

My purpose is to invite people to reconsider "settled" verities, especially when those "verities" are grounded in falsehood, "noise machine" conditioning, "alternative facts," glib assumptions or whole cloth lies.

I am English-Spanish bilingual, and therefore read Spanish literature.

One of my favorite Spanish thinkers is philosopher-scholar-novelist Miguel de Unamuno.

Unamuno's opening meme in the following post summarizes my intention.

"Miguel De Unamuno And The Bakery Of Life"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2015/09/miguel-de-unamuno-and-bakery-of-life.html

Looked at through a much narrower contemporary lens...

White People Who Say "All Lives Matter" Are The Equivalent Of...https://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2020/07/white-people-who-say-all-lives-matter.html

I do not know how to reply to MoreMemesPlease since his comment only enables me to "flag," not to "reply."

In any event, "More Memes," thanks for your thoughtful comment.

My reply is this...

Both elements you mention are operant.

Many black people are caught in a transgenerational "behavioral sink" where circumstances conspire to make it damn difficult to break free of the "downward pull," only after which they would be able to rise.

Obama spoke of this when he said: "If you're an employer and you have a chance to hire two equally qualified candidates, one named "James" and one named "Jamal," who are you going to pick?" (Yes, there are many expeceptions to every rule.)

The overlooked (and essentially invisible) nub of "white privelege" is that we white people do not have to confront the same suspicion, contempt and hatred that black people must confront every day of their lives.

To get a quick handle on this viewpoint, check out the following John Stewart meme:

"Cops Killing Innocent, Unarmed Black Men, Benghazi, Jon Stewart And Thomas Aquinas On Sin"
https://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2020/06/cops-killing-innocent-unarmed-black-men.html

So, I think it is decisively important to "level the playing field" so that the decisive motivator of "individual choice" has a real shot at coming into play.

Or, to use a somewhat hackneyed figure of speech, "to lift yourself up by your bootstraps, you first must have boots."

I encourage you to take a look at the following 12 minute video-history. (I was blown away.)
Brilliant Video History: The Key Difference Between "Income" And "Wealth" For U.S. Blacks https://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2020/07/brilliant-video-history-key-difference.html

Concerning your observation that you "owe it to your children not to throw away a system that works," I believe the existing - and essentiallybackward-looking, largely platitudinous - American system no longer works while the West European system of "socialized democracy" does.

As I see it, November's election distills to whether we re-double our efforts to ressurect a corpse, or if we decide to incorporate core philosophical underpinnings of the successful European model: to wit, embodying "The Common Good," "The General Welfare" and a truly "Social Contract."

"The Rich Aren't Just Grabbing A Bigger Slice Of The Income Pie. They're Taking It All"
http://paxonbothhouses.blogspot.com/2014/09/the-rich-arent-just-grabbing-bigger.html

Thanks again for your thoughts.

Heh @ the yeast meme. Interesting site, thanks for the links.

In response to the second link, I am of two minds on the topic.

On the one hand, "black lives matter" / "all lives matter" is much like "don't hurt my baby" / "why is your baby any more important than any other baby". It creates a reframe that robs the first of focus, trivialization by starvation of attention.

On the other hand, the two phrases are almost arbitrary, like flags, serving to signify loyalties rather than convey explicit meaning. They are banners of two (?) competing philosophies.

If I am not mistaken or misrepresenting your position based on my reading from your link, you are coming from the perspective of the philosophy that sees success (in this context) as the result of privilege, which emerges from power structures that benefit some at the expense of others, yes? The loan shark is wealthier than the tenement laborer because the shark traps the laborer in a cycle of dependence and extraction.

I tend to come from the other side. Success is the result of actions + luck. Different successes demonstrate varying degrees of effectiveness of actions (with the luck factor thrown in). One mountain is higher than another because the geologic forces led to that result. The relative prominence of the one is strictly observational.

The truth is probably a muddy hybrid. I have no doubt that social capital can be accrued by networks & benefit network participants who didn't earn it.

My problem with the privilege model is this: just as "all lives matter" rhetorically erases the matter of black deaths, "privilege!" rhetorically erases the significance of individual action (and all action is individual). It asserts a model of the world where success and failure are due to group power dynamics and not choices or actions (even though group dynamics are the integral of individual choices). There is no language in that model for individual choices or actions. You are where you are because of the system and that's it.

(continued)

(continued from previous)

If white privilege exists I certainly have it. If it works the way I am told then I am not even aware of it. However, what success I have enjoyed I can attribute to certain factors resulting from individual choices: my parents married before I was conceived, my mother stayed home to raise us, useful education was valued, positive norms of behavior were enforced, etc.

As far as I can tell most of the people screaming "black lives matter" are uninterested in these things or even seek to abolish them. Too bad; I owe it to my children not to threw away a system that works.

I know you didn't solicit my opinion but the topic is interesting and there are few enough reasonable people in the world. Have a good day AArchibald.

That’s ethnicity