Not sure which extreme position is worse. Thinking tje national anthem or pledge of allegiance has anything to do with the military, or thinking that hijacking and openly opposing the national anthem for a social "protest" is a good way to get your message across.
Absolutely not, I was positing a question, which of two extreme POSITIONS was worse. That went wayyyyy over your head, as everything does. All you are capable of is bringing up irrelevant way way wayyyy of topic extremist nonsense.
W- what...? What the f**k is this comparison? How does this fit in context? What the f**k is the point of this? What message are you saying to send? Never before have I been confused by a meme like this. It just doesn't make any sense
[deleted]
3 ups, 4y,
3 replies
Stop and think about it. I believe the meme is saying anyone who kneels while the anthem is being played is disrespectful to all those who fought and died for this country. It's symbolism. Where you don't give a frick about it, many people do. It doesn't make your opinion or their opinion any less important.
So by putting some random ass player of a sport no one f**king plays outside of a single nation beside the combined military forces of the allied nations during DDay, tgey are somehow compatible enough for you to say that kneeing is disrespectful to the dead of the second World War? What.
[deleted]
1 up, 4y,
2 replies
It triggered you enough to post it. And if you think American football doesn't have millions of fans around the world, maybe you need to get out more.
