Follow the FACTS...

Just read on Fox News (cue the triggered snowflakes) that Dems are starting another impeachment investigation. Because the first one worked so well, huh?
They didn't need evidence for the last one, so what's to stop another?

This and every Stalinist blue state governor will stampede moderates right into the open arms of GOP candidates in every political office. November red tsunami, boys.

Just like clockwork, they started the 1st impeachment to deflect news about Biden’s quid pro quo. Now they’re doing it again to deflect news about Obama’s treasury department spying on Flynn.

Okay. Really now? Obama spied on Flynn. Biden's quid pro quo.

I am kind of getting tired of correcting the rightist bullshit on this stream.

First, Trump is the one who did a quid pro quo with Ukraine, asking for information on Biden. Second, Obama is many things, but a creepy corrupt person is just not one of them. The right always act like they are innocent and blame the Democrats. Also, Donald Trump was impeached for a reason, and that reason was not because of any political gain, but because of wrongdoing.

Democrats are not people sent from hell, and people like you need to realize that. And both Democrats and Republicans alike are proposing COVID-19 stimulus packages to help the people affected by the quarantine and the pandemic, so that proves that both sides want to help the American people, not just the Republicans. Rightists like you act like Democrats and anyone who opposes Trump is automatically a liar and a sham to gain political power. Reality? People who oppose the president are pointing him out for his wrongdoing.

You only look at one side of the picture. Now, am I saying that Democrats are angels? HELL NO. Biden, just like Trump, has a sexual assault allegation against him, and, like Trump, has been caught in some really perverted photos. And having a person with photos and allegations similar to Trump could mean a person SIMILAR TO TRUMP, which I know that the Democrats do not want. However, it is their only choice right now. I just wish that a more competent, younger, person who has been in less creepy photos than our two candidates would get to run.

A quid pro que needs both sides to do something. They never did what Trump asked, so it's not a quid pro que. Unlike what Biden got.

In a quid pro quo both sides need to do something. Zelensky didn't do what Trump asked, so no quid pro quo happened. Now Biden WAS involved in a quid pro quo.

Quid pro quo = Something for something.

But the sheer fact that Trump asked is illegal in and of itself.

"I asked someone to murder another person, and they said no, so you cannot arrest me!"
"But the sheer fact you asked is illegal."
"..."

Now does this excuse Biden's quid pro quo? Not by any means.

In my opinion, I have two choices:

Joe Biden: A man with a sexual assault allegation against him, involved in a quid pro quo.

Donald Trump: A man multiple sexual assault allegations against him, tried to participate in a quid pro quo.

Not the best options here, people!

No, no it's not. He certainly didn't ask for someone to be murdered.

At least Trump isn't senile. And probably won't die in 2 years. Let joe go sleep.

But he asked for information on a political opponent, giving him dirt that he could spread on the Internet. So I say that that would give him an unfair advantage and is thus illegal. And I am not saying that Trump asked for someone to be murdered. I'll give him credit for that.

And Trump has a better chance of dying in two years than you think. He is 73, one year younger than his mother-in-law.

You do realize Biden jr had no experience in the field and couldn't speak Ukrainian, right? He was hired when Joe was put in charge of looking after Ukraine, right? You do remember that the dnc bought a phony dossier from foreign agents to stage a coup against a fairly elected president, right? You think Trump even knew Joe would take the nomination?

He's pretty healthy for 73 and his diet. But sure, anyone can die but I haven't seen Trump's eye bleeding on stage.

Trump is under suspicion of cooperating with the Russians. Before you say that that is not true, let me just say that Trump constantly praises the authoritarian leader Vladimir Putin, who assuredly a oppressive autocrat.

Further, I do think that Biden would get the nomination. Not as crazy as Sanders, there has not been a female president, so Elizabeth Warren did not have a likely chance of winning, so Joe actually had the best odds at the time.

No, it was because the dnc bought a fake dossier from a foreign agent and used it to spy on and open an investigation against Trump in order to remove him.

I'll say it again :

THERE IS NO TRUMP / RUSSIA COLLUSION. THAT'S A SETUP BY THE DEMS AND YOU FELL FOR IT.

Give your head a shake and wake up.

And I'll say it again:

I NEVER SAID THAT THERE WAS ANY RUSSIAN INFLUENCE. THERE WERE JUST SOME LEGITIMATE CONCERNS.

Give your eyes a workout and read my words, will ya?

https://nypost.com/2020/05/20/senate-committee-authorizes-subpoenas-in-hunter-biden-probe/

No one convicted in the Mueller probe had any charges to do with Russia.

Never said that anyone was convicted. There were legitimate concerns, but they turned out to be false. It was not because of politics or corruption, it was just because of a suspicious tie with Russia.

"legitimate concerns" that were brought about by the dnc buying a fake dossier from a foreign agent and using it to spy on and open an investigation against Trump.

When this happened you were 8. I doubt you were paying attention then.

Aight, who told you this? Fox News? Trump? Because I can assure you that both of those sources just want to make Trump look good and not reveal the true facts.

Praises Putin? He praises, kinda, Kim Jung Un. He also once called him Rocketman. Welcome to politics, kid. If there was no hoax Mueller investigation and Trump was 'mean' to Putin as prez, the media would be freaking out over that. Make you decisions but realize that's the media we're dealing with. Seriously, realize that. I've never seen anything like it but the MSM is completely sold out.

Yes, but that only means so much. Look, you say he wanted dirt. He wanted to smear across the media. He want to hurt Biden. Lots of 'wanted's there.

Hope you stick around. In this stream you'll get a few different viewpoints. Much better than the MSM and leftist teachers.

I will stick around. And I do not have leftist teachers. My teachers teach me things free of partisan influence.

Just remember that praising an autocrat raises suspicion. Further, the Mueller investigation had legitimate concerns because major players in Trump's campaign had ties with Russia. Also, the MSM does have facts in it.

“I am kind of getting tired of correcting the rightist bullshit on this stream“

Then quit trying to counter it with leftist BS.

Leftist BS huh? You sure are convinced that your side has it all right. Nothing about your side is wrong, and that my side was sent by the devil. This is what you act like. I openly admit that the side I am on right now has done shitty things, and yet you do not say that.

From paying attention the last 4 years.

Paying attention to what? Broaden your sources. Turn off Fox News and OANN. Listen to, not CNN, but the Epoch Times, New York Times, NBC, and those types of news networks, not just those that are biased in Trump's favor.

I never said my side is never wrong or your side is of the devil. That’s a conjecture you, and other leftists, make when the right disagrees with you. You’ve been so conditioned by biased media that you can’t comprehend that, what they tell you, isn’t true or isn’t the full story. So when you hear things like, “The Zelensky call doesn’t implicate Trump in any kind of crime or misdemeanor”, you cant accept it because it flys in the face of the fantasy you and others have wanted to believe, simply because you don’t like the person in the WH.

I only speak out when the right disagrees with me for false reasons. The Zelensky call was a crime because Trump wanted information on Joe Biden to give him an advantage in the re-elections. You cannot accept this because you adore the president so much that you think he cannot do anything wrong, and anyone who criticizes him is corrupt.

And I do know the media lies. A lot. Among the media, the ones who support Trump constantly lie about his achievements, just as you do on this stream.

Gee, then it must be a crime to buy a hoaxed dossier that you know is bs in order to smear the president and have him removed from office, which you (Comey) neglect to tell the FISA court was paid for by the DNC!

Again, where do you get this information? Honestly, I would like to know.

“Trump wanted information on Joe Biden to give him an advantage in the re-elections“

This is complete speculation with absolutely no basis on truth. Democrats believe it was his motivation because that’s exactly what Biden did and something they themselves would do. Maybe you should try actually reading the transcript yourself instead of parrot what you hear in the leftist media.

Fine then. First off, have YOU actually read the whole transcript?

Second, if you have, I would like to educate myself. Where did you find it?

I’m replying here because I can’t reply directly to your question below.

“have YOU actually read the whole transcript?”
Yes I have. It’s available from several sources on the web.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770

Okay, thank you so much!