Basics

Especially the one at the top.

He's not a doctor. He can only do what he was advised to do. Pray that the sick in mind running the CDC, WHO, and Fauci all get better so they can advise him on what he is supposed to do.

And the other people running this country are not all doctors either. They can only do what the best they can do with the facts presented to them. Meanwhile, Trump has avoided responsibility, attempted to control the narrative, continues to ignore most of the advice he's been given, and he wants the CDC, WHO, and Fauci to submit to his confirmation bias. Even if you think Trump got his way, the death toll will only continue to climb to record high. And the economy suffers either way.

He still will be President tho. Especially if he's right that the "game" is rigged.

Uh no. The dem controlled media is controlling the narrative, but when all the old people that still watch network news die (and they are dying because of covid-19) then the younger generation who get their news from independent sources on the internet who's only currency is the trust of their viewers, then things will change wildly.
Sources please on when he tried to avoid responsibility?
The CDC, WHO, and Fauci all told him that the virus wouldn't be that big of a deal. So he trusted the experts. See what happened there.

I would hardly call sources that echo the President to be independent. They are more akin to propaganda news stations from dictatorial countries that the President so disturbingly enjoys to mimic. And besides, if the tripe is to be believed that Democrats rig the election by employing dead people, then I imagine many Trump Supporters are shaking in their boots at the potentially tens of thousands of people who will be voting for Biden from the grave come November. It's like Night of the Living Dead, innit? Or is the Walking Dead a better reference? I suppose both have the message that the living are just as dangerous as the dead. Though, honestly I haven't gone past the first season of the show.

Yes, they told him it wouldn't be a big of deal at first... but now that the circumstances of evidence has changed, it seems he's more than happy to re-open the government despite the warnings of his advisers. After all, Covid-19 is an unprecedented not seen in the US for 100 years. So, it is forgivable for scientist to err once. That doesn't mean they're no longer reliable. It is this dangerous mindset that has been programmed into a great many people for over twenty years with the media that if you somehow make a mistake that you are no longer reputable. That is why it is so important for Trump to mitigate responsibility. But why should Trump escape criticism for the excuse that he he was doing "the best he can with the information he got" and no one else? No scientist, no other politician, is afforded that kind of leniency and it is time for Trump to realize he is in over his head.

What's the difference between one person echoing another and two people independently coming to the same conclusion that is factual truth?
From the outside there is no difference. So if Trump is telling the truth and the news source is too, then all you are doing is throwing out the Truth because 'Trump'.

Instead of looking at who said what you should instead look at the facts and logic in what they say, test them and see if they are truth. Then decide. Don't just see 'Trump' and decide its wrong.

There will barely be any democrats voting for Biden. He's literally the worst candidate they could have put up against Trump. Instead many will stay home or hold their nose in disgust and vote for Trump. All the swing voters will also vote for Trump, mostly because he's not as racist or as senile as Biden is.

What will happen is the dems will cheat like mad. Hopefully Trump and the general public will watch them like hawks and we can clean up the voting system. If each patriot just followed one government employee around who had to do with the elections and video them doing their shady thing, this thing would be over in one election cycle.
List of ways they'll cheat: dead people voting, teenagers hacking voter machines, reps discarding republican mail in ballots, 'finding' trucks full of Biden votes, illegals voting at multiple polling places, vote harvesting of people that don't know what planet they are on, etc...etc...
It's all going to come to light.

Where do you get those numbers:

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?utm_campaign=homeAdvegas1?#countries

Didnt the dead caused by COVID19 recently reach 100K?

Idk. I just saw this article in a German Media outlet. There they are say that your death is about to reach 100k¯\_(0_0)_/¯

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.merkur.de/welt/coronavirus-usa-donald-trump-news-new-york-gouverneure-tote-infizierte-fallzahlen-covid-19-zr-13762129.amp.html

About to, but not there yet. At our current rate, we may reach that in two or three days. We are dealing with a secondary crisis of credibility. No one is believing scientists or statistics that do not conform to their confirmation bias. So, we have to be careful of what we say least we be called out for being intellectually dishonest by the intellectually dishonest. 1984 indeed.

Actually, the hysteria is real manifestation of the panic-generating 'Media', but it's totally unjustified.

If 100,000 dead was true, which it isn't, that would be approximately 99.98% survival rate. Correct?

Fix'd

Would you care to share how 99% of the people who have the virus have survived?

Please show your work.

Maybe learn to read. Did I mention which virus? Nope. All of them? Possibly. Do 99% survive viruses? Yep.

Why do idiots believe any statistics?

Anyway, 94% is from the hysteria crowd. Why don't you show your work?

Why should I show my work if you refuse to show yours?

Relax, I'm going to show my work. Not all viruses have a 1% fatality rate and a good portion of the total population do survive 99% of them but that is not how viruses that are currently active are measured by fatality. Covid-19, which is not the flu nor is it as deadly as the flu and is also very real. To purport that the virus is real and then to retreat from that position shows you to be incredibly intellectually dishonest and intending to spread false misinformation that will only cause the death toll to climb. Lying to people does not fix anything.

You see, Covid-19 has a potential fatality rate of 6%, and if the entire population of the world were infected, then approximately 6% would die. Given that only .07% of the global population have been infected, you can the claim that 99.93% have survived, but not necessarily 99% of densely populated countries will survive.

Besides, the context is focused on those who test positive, and from those that test positive feel nothing. This is correct but that means that the next sentence must also be focused on those that test positive and not the total population and therefor the correct approximation would be that 94% survive.

I suppose I could counter your question with why idiots believe any statistics, when you yourself are making them, why do you believe your statistic? What makes your claim any more false because it does not come from the government or the media... or as most people who think call it... reliable sources?

Anyway... Globally, 344,754 deaths divided by 5,446,514 cases amounts to 0.0632, which converted into percent by multiplying 100 gives us a product of 6.32% fatality.

If you have a healthy skepticism of the total pool of deaths to cases globally, perhaps because you are untrusting of foreign governments and scientists, then I shall gather it from a more reliable pool. Not just because it's from the United States but because of our higher than usual number of infected, it gives us a better understanding of what the true fatality rate really is.

96,002 US deaths divided by 1,595,885 amounts to 0.0602, which converted into percent by multiplying again by 100 gives us a product of 6.02% fatality.

So, 94% who have tested positive for Covid-19 have survived.

I was joking. No need to write a book. I'll pass. Thank.

If you think this is a book, then I suggest you open one sometime.

Ha. Cute. Ironic too. You are probably someone who would resort to burning books. Stop the hysteria.

6% is stupid.

I'm glad you're against book burning, at least. But books do you no good if you don't read them.

100,000 / 350 million is 0.02%