book of myths and things that dont exist

2nxgje.gif (click to show) Hilarious

Careful, you might trigger 'synthetic-Mantis' into telling you what you believe because you laughed at a joke.

Funny is funny. Of course it does not mean all of them but we all know people who are irrational on both sides. I tend to stay away from these people.

ask him what he interprets

Why? You already KNOW what he interprets and believes because he thought this was funny.

why does he think it's funny?

"You already KNOW what he interprets"

i don't know. however, i'm inferring that he interprets that there are no rational liberals, and finds that funny because, based on some of my previous encounters with him, he can be a bit self-congratulatory.

Simple wording, lots of pictures XD

Oh look, that could be the only possible inference one could make. No, its just your inference and therefore its the only inference that matters.

Your quite enamored with yourself. Too bad myself, and possibly others, find you to be a petulant twerp with severe snowlfake sensitivities.

(notice how l said "possibly others", thats because I am logical enough to understand that also may not)...

"Your quite enamored with yourself. Too bad myself, and possibly others, find you to be a petulant twerp with severe snowlfake sensitivities"

you're one to talk.

"possibly others"

you should ask SydneyB, Timber1972, and/or OlympianProduct. then show them this conversation

"(notice how l said "possibly others", thats because I am logical enough to understand that also may not)..."

big ooops

I don't run around bemoaning polemic memes and the upvotes they get. Thats top notch snowflake pansy ass shit, right here.

You do realize the more you comment on this thread, the more likely other people are to click on it to see the discussion, thereby driving more eyes and attention to the meme? You probably don't realize that, you're not a very bright girl.

"polemic"

again, you're trying really hard to defend your damage control. let's face it: this meme was intended to take floor away from people who disagree with you. the moment you were called out on your shit, you panicked. i can see how very few people could interpret it as a polemic, but that's still poorly executed.

"You do realize the more you comment on this thread, the more likely other people are to click on it to see the discussion, thereby driving more eyes and attention to the meme? You probably don't realize that, you're not a very bright girl."

attention =/= upvotes

""""""declaration"""""" is apparently another word for mistake-correcting."

No, no its not. But I understand your confusion, you are after all a huge idiot.

"No, no its not"

oh yes, yes it is.

"you are after all a huge idiot."

and you're still a disingenuous asshat. i'm surprised you haven't blocked me yet lol

I can tell your pushing to be blocked, the problem is I have too much fun running rings around you. Watching you engage in mind reading and then saying 'I mistated my argument" only to double down on mind reading again.

You're an incredible ass hat who suffers from thinking he is more smart than he actually is.

"I have too much fun running rings around you"

lovely. i'm talking to another chosanwan. basically thinks he's running rings when he's suffering from polio.

"You're an incredible ass hat who suffers from thinking he is more smart than he actually is."

lmao i never said i was hyper-intelligent. it's hypocritical that you're the one bringing that up when you're also the one "running rings around me".

"if your meme is a """"""polemic"""""", it's still poorly executed"

Thank you for your analysis, Oh Overlord of Meme Generating and Grading.

Take your snowflakeness away, before you have to do more "I mis-worded it" damage control.

"Thank you for your analysis, Oh Overlord of Meme Generating and Grading."

you're welcome, oh masterful lord of making tricky memes that are difficult to interpret

"before you have to do more "I mis-worded it" damage control."

still not as big of a blunder as you retroactively saying "look! my meme is a polemic! i am clever!"

"still not as big of a blunder as you retroactively saying "look! my meme is a polemic! i am clever!""

Or you simply missed it was polemic, and to help you understand I made the declaration.

Anything else you would like to "re-word" or should you just delete all your comments and start over from the beginning? It appears you have the free time.

"Or you simply missed it was polemic, and to help you understand I made the declaration"

lmao """""declaration"""""" is apparently another word for mistake-correcting. i know i've made my mistakes, but your meme could use the most rewording if that was really its intention. all i really did in the beginning was react to the clear messaging in your meme. how can you not see the obvious?

"or should you just delete all your comments and start over from the beginning? It appears you have the free time."

aight tough guy. maybe i'll delete the ones where i used images as a clutch for my opposition is doing wrong-- oh wait

Now you are telling me my intentions...you just can't help yourself. Its amazing from one meme you claimed to be able to infer (ascertain) my beliefs, then what others believe because they upvoted it, and now what my intentions were.

You should really start a 1-900 Line and compete with Miss Cloe.

what else were you doing? if your meme is a """"""polemic"""""", it's still poorly executed. you only told people it was a polemic after they got into long-winded debates with you. if anything, it could've been an attempt to see how many angry liberals you could've congregated to meet your angry liberal quota.

No, it's just my response to morons who dont realize they are morons. Moron.

operating a bit of a double standard lmao

Shoe me where where I said you "you thought you were HYPER-INTELLIGENT"? I never said it.

I said you believe yourself to be smarter than you are.

I told you earlier, you're already in a hole, drop the shovel.

"I said you believe yourself to be smarter than you are."

where the hell do you get that from? is this your response to anyone who confronts you?

"I said you believe yourself to be smarter than you are."

where the hell do you get that from? is this your response to anyone who confronts you? insult their intelligence?

We see just how irrational every week on this site.

This dude did not link you to a conservapedia article. smh

'An embryo isn't a baby'

It is a living human, just at a different stage of life.

'Your god kills babies yet you are okay with that'

No He does not. And He is not 'my God'. He is our God.

'Abortion isn't murder'

Yes it is because you are murdering a living human.

'According to Christianity, no one is innocent. Read the Bible.'

Except I did mean innocent in the sense of being 'free of sin'. The official definition of innocent is 'free of crime or offence' (yet another definition you are unfamiliar with). That is what I meant. And your comment is still wrong, because there have been people who are free of sin: Mary and Jesus. Read the Bible, and try actually reading my comment while you're at it. And you do not need to tell me to read the Bible because I already have read the Bible.

'No they aren't.'

Yes they are.

'I know you think conservapedia is a reliable source, but it's not'

That is a matter of opinion. It would seem that the word 'opinion' is yet another word you are unfamiliar with. And since you do not know the definition, it means 'a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge'. Seriously, are you a minor, or is English not your first language. I already know that you have mental health problems, which may help explain your lack of understanding of the English language.

'Find me some actual scientific research done by actual scientists that says homosexuals are more likely to be pedophiles.'

I already have. I will post the link again. Did you even read the article. It is very informative.
https://www.conservapedia.com/Homosexuality_and_pedophilia

'I am not a pedophile'

Are you sure about that, pony boy?

Part 1:

'An embryo has human DNA. It's not a baby.'

So you think that ever living thing that is not a baby should be murdered?

'He's not my God. I don't worship or believe in him.'

He is your God because he made you, no matter whether or not you respect that truth.

'And if you believe the Bible, then you believe he kills babies. The Bible says so.'

I have been over this many times with you before. It was the sin of Man that caused these deaths, not God. Had Man not been so sinful, such a thing would never have happened. And you do this very often. You bring up something I disagree with, I prove your claim wrong, you refuse to continue the debate, and then bring up the same point I already proved wrong a while later. You are unbearably stubborn and incapable of moving on from lost debates, or coming up with new "arguments" (or at least pathetic excuses for them).

'No, abortion isn't murder. It's legal. Murder is not.'

Nations where abortion is considered murder by law: Afghanistan, Argentina, Angola, Bangladesh, Benin, Brazil, Central African Republic, Chad Chili, Congo, Colombia, Cote d’Ivory, Dominican Republi,c Egypt, El Salvador, Gabon, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Honduras, Indonesia, Iran, Kenya Laos, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libya, Mexico, Madagascar, Mali, Mauritius, Mauritania, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Niger, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Senegal, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, UAE, Uganda, Vatican City, Venezuela and Yemen.

Nations where the death penalty is legal: Afghanistan, India, Nigeria, USA, Iran, Japan, Taiwan, Kuwait, Zimbabwe, Libya, Thailand, Guyana, Uganda, Bangladesh, Iraq, Indonesia, Botswana, UAE, Bahamas, Cuba, Belarus, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Vietnam, Syria, Egypt, South Sudan, DRC, Ethiopia, China, Sudan, Comoros, Somalia, Barbados, Malaysia, Chad, Pakistan, Oman, Singapore, St Kitts and Nevis, St Lucia, Bahrain, North Korea, Equatorial Guinea, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Palestinian territories, Trinidad and Tobago, Lesotho, Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, Dominica, Jamaica and Jordan.

'Then babies are still not innocent, because they're guilty of the offense of sin.'

I already said that I did mean innocent in the sense of being 'free of sin'. You are still not reading my comments properly, but then again, English is evidently not exactly your strong spot.

'You enjoy assuming that I don't know the meanings of words when I clearly do :) haha'

Whatever you want to tell yourself :) haha

Part 2 coming soon

Octavia-'He's not my God. I don't worship or believe in him.'

Toby-'He is your God because he made you, no matter whether or not you respect that truth.'

Octavia-'And if you believe the Bible, then you believe he kills babies. The Bible says so.'

Toby-'I have been over this many times with you before. It was the sin of Man that caused these deaths, not God. Had Man not been so sinful, such a thing would never have happened.'

Toby, if you agree with Timber1972's belief that Leftists are people who push their beliefs on others then you are by your own definition, a leftist and if not, then by his definition a leftist.

If you believe that your god created everything, including man and the concept of sin, then he and not man is responsible for Biblical infanticide.

Your argument is essentially the same as beating a child to punish them and telling them it is their fault that they are being beaten.

God is infinitely good. And God gave man free will because He is infinitely good. The free will of man is responsible for original sin. God cannot be held responsible for the terrible things the free will of man caused, because had He not granted them free will, God would not have been infinitely good. Also, I disagree with Timber1972's view of leftists. Now quit commenting on two week old memes.

'I never said that, of course'

But you said that 'an embryo has human DNA. It's not a baby.'

'It's your belief, not a truth. You certainly can't show compelling evidence for it.'

.

'God sent the floodwaters in the story, so he's responsible for the deaths.'

It was the sin of Man that made God send the floodwaters. Read the Bible.

'you're right about one thing, I am stubborn.'

At least we can agree on one thing.

'Then you list (among others) a bunch of radical Muslim nations. Are you saying we should be like radical Muslim nations?'

No. Of course not. What on earth made you come to that twisted and false conclusion? Probably the same twisted logic that led you to believe that an all-loving and all-good God is immoral, that religions with mostly peaceful agendas are evil, that young and impressionable minds should be exposed to the homosexual agenda, that your extremist views are rational, that homosexuality is somehow 'normal', that all religious people (who make up a majority of the population) are delusional, and that it is perfectly normal and not at all bizarre or suspicious that an adult male watches a little girls' TV show. Anyway, just because I listed a few radical Muslim nations as opponents to abortion and supporters of the death penalty does not mean in any way whatsoever that I support radical Islam. I am very much opposed to it, actually. Out of all your bizarre comments you have posted, that statement has got to be up there as one of the worst I have ever read.

'More radical Muslim nations'

So what? And how is it so that you are both an islamophobe and an opponent of Donald Trump's choice to deport dangerous illegal foreign terrorists? It just goes to show how harmful MSM brainwashing is, and how far the brainwashed will go to prove their irrational hatred of Donald Trump.

'Do you believe that babies are born with original sin?'

Yes. Why?

Actually, I can show evidence for God creating everything. Want me to?

'Name them'

I can't because you deleted your comment where you listed them.

'I won't hesitate to report you for harassment if you don't stop.'

lol now I know that you're not a pedophile because you're a baby XD

'The fact that you confuse enjoying a cartoon with being sexually attracted to children says a lot about you.'

What does that say about me, exactly?

'I recall making such a list, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.'

At least you are relatively honest . . .

'None of the things on that list impair my ability to comprehend the English language, however.'

. . . never mind.

'I actually care about my reputation'

. . . says the same person who posts angry rants online, extremist political statements and memes about a little girls' TV show.

You know that just saying you are rational doesn't mean it's true, right? Can you give any specific examples?

And I asked you for examples. Can you give any? If not I'll assume you know you're lying.

First of all, I am not a girl. Second of all, this is not 'behind your back'. This is a public website. It is for all to see. Third of all, you are quite possibly one of the last people I would 'have a crush on'. So, in short, there was not a single word of truth in your comment. No wonder nobody trusts you.

:)

I am well aware of that. I was being disingenuously, insincerely and sarcastically ingenuous and naïve. It is known as being 'faux naïf'. A simple definition is 'sarcastic naïvety'. I just wanted to roast you.

Try taking a few deep breaths to calm down. I find it difficult to see people humiliate themselves online. If you wish to delete your comment (something you do quite often) I would understand perfectly. But I will take a screenshot of your comment anyway.

Who is georgemonger?

You must have way too much time on your hands if you are commenting on 2 week old memes.

Firstly, you asked for screenshots and proof, but say 'didn't think so' without even giving regnomegroeg the chance to respond. Secondly, you do defend pedophiles because you defend the homosexual agenda. And thirdly, by denying that you defend Muslims, you are an islamaphobe.

toby the pug I see that you play into stereotypes a lot. I have met many homosexuals and none of them were perverts you cited conservepedia not wikipedia which would show no bias

I know that to be false because you defended yourself ;)

Do you have any valid response to any of the other topics I brought up (e.g. your islamophobia)

So do you admit that Donald Trump is not islamophobic?

How is it so that you are both an islamophobe and an opponent of Donald Trump's choice to deport dangerous illegal foreign terrorists? It just goes to show how harmful MSM brainwashing is, and how far the brainwashed will go to prove their irrational hatred of Donald Trump.

And I'll be sure to point it out as you will inevitably make some asinine irrational comment.

Actually, it's meant to be polemic and therefore irrational. The difference is my irrational statement was by design, whereas you simply make irrational statements you mistake for rational. And I will be happy to point that out.

Of course not. The statement was made a meme for polemic purposes

"The president is allowed to make religious statements, but I can say it's unethical for him to single out a particular religion and give it special attention."

More rampant irrationality. He is not ethically challenged here, and your meme didn't allege that. It alleged a violation of the Constitution, hence why you said "read the the Constitution".

... says the same person who thinks all religious people are delusional.

Nothing in your meme mentioned anything about ethics. You created that argument after the fact. That argument is lacking foundation.

"the president of a multicultural country shouldn't give special focus to one particular religion."

What absurdity. He was commenting on Easter, which is a Christian Holiday, that doesn't mean it's "special focus". Further even if he did "special focus" to anything Christian there is nothing unethical about it. You are just claiming it is so, without explaining as to how. Simply because the United States has citizens who's religious beliefs are different from that of Christianity doesn't prohibit (on grounds of ethics) the President from making reference to Christian Holidays or even Christian beliefs. There is nothing immoral about this (ethics refers to branch of knowledge that deals with moral principles).

Irrationality was intentional. I said it two comments ago.

Here is a prime example of your irrational analysis.

imgflip.com/i/3u2iqb

Nothing in the Constitution prohibits the president from making religious statements. Separation of church and state are not applicable, in case you were implying that. The president is completely within his rights protected by the Constitution to make religious statements. The Constitution would prohibit the president from compelling people to attend religious services of any kind.

I was talking about this whole thing with Octavia Melody before when I was saying “Liberals are not logical.” He/she doesn’t understand what we mean by, “Liberals as people can be logical, but what they stand for in politics is not.” The liberals will never understand, and it does make me wonder if they as people can be logical.