I think it's fair and accurate to say what the snowflakes will never admit, which is the science doesn't support the notion that shelter at home has had any impact whatsoever on the spread or lack thereof, of the Wuhan bat virus.
The entire country has the same number of people as Los Angeles county alone. Los Angeles has had the same number of cases but less than half the number of deaths. 40% of Swedish households are single-person with no kids. Their culture values distance. In a way, they're already self-isolating.
How do you think the seniors caught the virus genius? It just floated in from the neighborhood? So if they've done "very little testing" then there could be a lot more people with the virus and they're all just walking around giving it to each other and to grandma.
If Sweden is taking so many precautions, why do they have twice as many deaths for the same numbers of infected as LA county? And why is their rate of infection twice as high as surrounding countries?
Typically ill-informed snowflake that you are blue bunny, completely unaware that the models took social distancing, self-quarantining, etc., all of that into account... and were wrong 100% of the time.
These are assumptions. They don't have solid evidence of any of this. They're theorizing based off a relatively small population sample. There's no evidence saying the lockdown was not successful in or did not contribute to flattening the curve.
Caption this Meme
