Triggering Liberal SJW's is my hobby. Make it yours, it's fun!

[image deleted]

Maybe in one of your wettest dreams. So who's a neo nazi?

You've got your isms mixed up. Try communism for comrades, f*ggot. Typical illiterate that you liberals are.

Y'all are so hateful you can't help yourselves...

Dusting off a template lol

Excuse me, but your ignorance is showing.

Because from all the pics online, they must've been the only two there! LOL

If you take the time to watch video of the march, you'll see Asian men and women, Hispanic men and women, Muslim men and women, Black men and women, and White men and women. It was a very diverse march and not a single incident happened. When interviewed, gun owners and Patriots gave intelligent and detailed responses. Unlike the Women's March where more than half of them couldn't tell you why they were even there and when pressed with further questions could only say "F Trump" like trained monkeys. So there's that.

That's not an exaggeration or anything. I'm sure the Asians were giving intelligent answers. But as far as the violence goes, or lack thereof, we already know a planned mass shooting was thwarted prior to, thanks to the failing FBI @@

the only thing that was thwarted was antifa

LOL! I invite anyone to google Virginia gun rally and pull up images to see just how "diverse" it was!

is that a template?

yes. an overused exploitable is a template

what is the name of it tho?

"does he bite"

Well first of all, it was the Women's March, not the March For Life. That hasn't happened yet. And as a fellow Trump supporter, I love the meme. Gotta fix it though. The March For Life is a great thing, don't want to mix it up with the Leftist Hate Trump March that they call the Women's March.

Don’t have to rely on me — Why don’t you enlighten us on that? I can’t seem to readily find data going back that far. Not sure if it exists.

You and I both know that black voting rights were far from secure during that particular period of our history.

And the longer you go back in time, the farther removed we get from how both parties actually are today.

Why won’t you?

Does that data even exist? Do you know?

If anything you have to offer disproves my point, go ahead. I spent a little bit of time doing your own research for you but that’s not really my job.

Maybe there is no data before ‘36. Do you know?

If you have an argument for why starting in that year in particular is misleading, shoot.

1. The chart was easy to find
2. I had no clue anyone looking at this would care that the chart doesn’t go back for more than 80 years
3. The notion this chart deliberately excludes data depends upon that data existing in the first place

You could prove that by finding that data and posting it here. Maybe that data would say something different and surprising. Maybe it wouldn’t!

Your turn

Do you have any legitimate complaints about this particular source other than casting vague aspersions?

Historically, ‘36 was the start of FDR’s second term and presumably the middle of New Deal programs as well.

But what would that mean for this graph, exactly?

And does data prior to that even exist? Have you looked into it yet?

Did pollsters back in ‘36 deliberately start collecting data in that year in anticipation of an unenlightening debate about black voting trends conducted over a thing called the internet in the year 2020?

If so, then this Leftist conspiracy thing is bigger than I imagined

You have called my chart into question

I will now call your unsupported claims into question

On what data are you basing the “great switch” theory of ‘32 upon?