Jesus and Child

Sorry, BABIES. Hahahahahaha will it be preemies next?

"TRUMP PUT FETUSES IN CAGES!!!"

This is an argument from silence fallacy. e.g. Where does Jesus say *specifically* that you can't run over your neighbor with your car? It covers it under thou shalt not murder. Of course, you see the point, but we both know you saw the point in my meme. You, in a manner you're notorious for, are attempting to pooh, pooh that which you don't like and chaps your hide by employing intellectual dishonesty.

The bible doesn't have to list moral charge specifically with the details of modern times to hold moral application - It just has to list the moral charge and prohibition against slander - Which it does.

Satan is another name for the devil. The Word Origin for the devil is derived from the Latin world Diabolus, from Greek diabolos means enemy, accuser, slanderer. It means literally: to throw across, hence, to slander.

You would think that an issue that is important enough to be the central issue of an entire so called "Evangelical Christian," movement, would have warranted Christ's attention. Yet, not a peep. Curious.

Larry - You committed the same argument from silence logical fallacy the guy I'm responding to did. That's not an argument for a position, but the antithesis of one.

My favorite argument from you was the one some months ago that you kept arguing against what I had stated even tho I was clearly in total agreement with your position and was verifying it.

What's the name of that fallacy, other than being a beyond contrarian one committed by a major idiot?

I can't really respond, because I don't really remember the exchange. I do make mistakes and apologize if I had done so in the conversation you're alluding to.

Ahh, simple. You were absent for a few, yes? Go back to your very last exchange prior. That's it..

btw, when you find it, let me know so I can bookmark it, defo Top 3 in terms of the most sincerely asinine and ridiculously stupid and deliberately obtuse discussions I've had the pleasure with any of the droves of knee-jerk wind up circus monkey toys on this site.

I love, love, love this site.

I get it. You're butthurt from our exchanges in our past and want to squeeze a much mileage out of what you claim is a mistake I may have made - Assuming I made such a mistake. I'm not here to play wet nurse for you because you're licking and trying to redeem yourself from past wounds of hurt pride. By the way, I couldn't respond to your comment about humans being more brutal than animals because the thread stopped offering reply options. Don't worry. With time, the butthurt will go away. You only need patience.

Butthurt because you're a one dimensional twit so gung-ho on your role as a non-thinking bot? Tell me, does my negatively impacted set of buttocks rival your most delightfully impressive brain damage?
I mean guy, it was like me repeatedly telling you I dress only in black and you repeatedly asking why do I love dressing in red polka dots on green all the time.

Humans are more brutal than animals for two reasons as supplied by Genesis:

1. Humans were created in the image of the Gods, and unlike the Serpent God, most of the Gods are major assholes.

2. Animals did not partake of the fruit, so sin does not annoint their births and thus they are not given over to it.

Thanks for verifying my prior response, but it's really not necessary. I had full confidence in my position. I'll be going now before I cause you any trauma and you become triggered and go into a tirade of ebonics.

Aww, poow widdle CentralNYGuy gonna go now and disappear like he did the last time after he finally realized his excrutiatingly (ouch!) blunder?

OOH did you dis Ebonics? What is this, 1989? That sit be ill, yo, homestyle stuff.
Careful thuh Negroids don't come 'n eatcha.

Says the person who supports killing babies

Obama built those "Cages". Which are empty now thanks to Trump. The Left killing millions of babies is ok by you, I bet! You probably drool over their tiny carcasses

I am going to put aside the deflective misinformation you have attempted to use to steer this away from the issues of mixing Christianity with Politics. In the Bible, Christ outright says to keep them separate. The story of man in the bible begins with the Snake telling him that what is good is bad and what is bad is good. In that story, man was fooled and paid the price. If you think that Christ would choose one party over the other, why would he choose the one that conveys a message much like the Snake's? He would probably say, "Render unto the Democrats and Republicans, that which is theirs and keep my name out of it." The way I see it, using the name of Christ to support a man who has already likened himself to the Snake, and surrounds himself with evil people, is doing the work of the Snake. Bringing religion into politics just cheapens your beliefs and does nothing to make the system better.

I think it is hilarious the way all the people who are losing it over abortion, just ignore the fact that their pary is causing suffering by eliminating food and medicine for many poor people. I would have expected one of them to say "Obama," invented hunger!" I am not "pro-abortion," as they insist. I just don't recall Christ making any statement about it, one way or the other. For them to wed Christianity to that issue to advance their political party is blasphemy.

The standard definition of a living person is not a wad of sperm and an egg, mixing together for a month or so. Almost 99% of abortions occur before 21-weeks. That means most of the fertilized eggs, zygots, blastocysts and fetuses, are not really babies, as we commonly see them. In fact one irrefutable expert on the subject has demonstrated that life does not begin until a person takes their first breath.

Genisis 2:7
King James Bible
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

If the man that God created was not a living soul until he took a breath, why do people who call themselves "believers," question His definition of life? Don't bother answering, you will only contradict "the word."

Excellent response.

I take a simple, straight forward statement from the Bible, which people have taken as the "word of God," for thousands of years, and it seems to confuse you. It says that when "God ," gave him "the breath of life," he "became a living soul." Prior to breathing "the breath of life," he was the "dust of the ground," and, just like a zygot, was not a living human being.

It is your position that, because I do not think it should be illegal for a woman to have a doctor flush a zygot from her body, I condone the murder of baby that does not exist. I accept the Biblical version of when life begins, when the breath of life is first taken. You must believe the politico-fairy tale that life begins at conception.