The hypocrisy of these climate doomers is truly amazing.

nice meme lol

3igtoo.gif (click to show) I think your post is terrific up vote

that's why i support tulsi. she uses amtrak rather than pretends it doesn't exist

wasn't from hawaii. i think she was using the northeast corridor. what's the next smear?

A lot of people from Hawai'i aren't fans of Gabbard. She took donations for her re-election bid then transferred them over to her POTUS campaign before even notifying people she was running. Not to mention her anti-LGBTQ history. I can see why people unfamiliar with her record might be enchanted, but she just spends way too much time wooing people on Fox News.

No need to fight. Everyone agrees that all the Democrat candidates are horrible garbage.

"Everyone" in your little chamber of thoughts

Sure, everyone loves the child molester, the fake Indian, the communist gargoyle, and the gay midget. That's why billionaire globalists are jumping in lol

not those candidates (apart from the "communist" gargoyle), but only a few others

"A lot of people from Hawai'i aren't fans of Gabbard"

where'd you get the info from? she was elected into Hawaii's 2nd congressional district, and has a lot of grassroots support.

"She took donations for her re-election bid then transferred them over to her POTUS campaign before even notifying people she was running."

again, where are you hearing this from? the presidency is a longshot, and i can understand why she changed her funding direction.

"Not to mention her anti-LGBTQ history."

that was years ago. can hardly say she's enacting any of it now.

"I can see why people unfamiliar with her record might be enchanted, but she just spends way too much time wooing people on Fox News."

what's wrong with convincing right wing voters to vote left? isn't that what it should look like, instead of a rightwinger running on a leftwing platform? what's the logic here?

She's not "enacting" it but she hasn't changed her feelings about LGBTQ. She's just not trying to pass legislation against them... for now. But that could easily change as could her political affiliation. If you think she's trying to convince right-wingers to vote left, you don't know her very well. She's a climber. She'll get there any way she can, even if it means she has to become a Republican to do it. And in my opinion, that wouldn't be a big leap for her. She's already half-way there.

i've asked you multiple times, and i'll ask you again. where are you getting all of this from?

"she hasn't changed her feelings about LGBTQ"

she supports affordable housing for the LGBTQ. and she has changed. https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1085959314345463810

show me when kamala harris owned up to prosecuting parents for their children missing school, or when a candidate you support owned up. hillary and obama had anti-lgbtq histories as well. if she was still anti-lgbt, she would include it in her website to appeal to far-right voters.

"If you think she's trying to convince right-wingers to vote left, you don't know her very well."

better than you know her. i've seen the fox news clip with tucker carlson. fox news has earned my respect for letting a democrat speak while nbc continues to enact censorship of candidates who dare let republicans vote left mingle in their support.

"She's already half-way there."

halfway to being a republican? it's hard enough convincing her to be a 3rd party

Ask people from San Francisco how they know so much about Kamala Harris and her record as a DA. Gabbard said that after serving with gays in the military, she realized she can't tell people what to do in their personal lives. That's not the same as being pro-LGBTQ or not being anti. And Tucker Carlson can suck it. If Tulsi and the Republicans come together, it won't be because they're going left. It'll be because she's joined their side.

And again no sources. Therefore we cannot believe you at all. Please give undeniable sources from both liberal and conservative news sites. Then we can believe you.

GTFO LOL! I really don't care whether you believe me or not, professor. I've got more important stuff going on in my life than trying to dig up sources to get an A on my meme comment. XD

So this is just a rant board for you? Everyone, including me, should post facts and evidence to back up their claims before spouting off. If you don't have time to dig up sources then I guess you have more important stuff to do like wasting time posting possibly made up stuff about Tulsi Gabbard on imgflip? That kind of important life stuff? You obviously read about the things you are posting somewhere right? That should be one source that you remember. And then if you can find at least one other conservative source verifying the same information. Shouldn't be much to "dig" up at all right? Especially if you want to prove your point with facts and evidence and end the debate.

i posted one, mate. it was a twitter link, but it's a primary source if anything.

"I've got more important stuff going on in my life than trying to dig up sources to get an A on my meme comment. "

is that supposed to be an own? you're digging up obscure conspiracy garbage. you might want to start posting some undisputed facts.

couldn't 'ave said it better myself

"Gabbard said that after serving with gays in the military, she realized she can't tell people what to do in their personal lives. That's not the same as being pro-LGBTQ or not being anti."

on the contrary, you'll find that many politicians who are anti-LGBT think they can tell people what to do in their personal lives.

"And Tucker Carlson can suck it. If Tulsi and the Republicans come together, it won't be because they're going left. It'll be because she's joined their side."

honestly, i don't get it with leftists being elitist about republicans voting democrat. isn't convincing people to vote progressive part of basic politics?

#1, she wouldn't get very far in the Dem party if she started trying to pass anti-LGBTQ legislation. She has never once said "I think gays should be able to marry." What she did say was she can't tell them not to. She hasn't changed her personal feelings toward gays AT ALL.

#2, again, she's trying to play both sides of the fence which doesn't work because the two sides want very different things. She's not going to be convincing any Republicans to be progressive. Are you kidding me? Progressives are even farther to the left than Democrats. She's going to have to be more Republican to get their vote which is not the same thing.

"... if she started trying to pass anti-LGBTQ legislation"

where do you get the idea that she will do that?

"She hasn't changed her personal feelings toward gays AT ALL."

everybody gangsta until the political argument have all caps. a whole thread and website state otherwise.

"again, she's trying to play both sides of the fence which doesn't work because the two sides want very different things"

according to the elite republicans and elite democrats. there are a few on this site.

"Progressives are even farther to the left than Democrats."

she isn't a centrist. no war means no war.

"She's going to have to be more Republican to get their vote which is not the same thing."

there are such thing as non-linear thinkers. if spoken to on different platforms, they'll be convinced.

Haha Can't cuck the Tuck, bozo. Triggered that he has an open forum, huh?

You support her because she rode in a train? Can the threshold in the Dem party sink any lower?

it's better than supporting someone who has a lot of private are travel. why, how many rides should my favorite candidate have had on jeffrey epstein's plane?

https://imgflip.com/gif/3il0wj

hoax

There, my friend, you are wrong. Where I have never dealt directly with President Trump, I have had many many business dealings directly with Michael Bloomberg. I can say without hesitation, I do not like him as a businessman nor as a person.

Hear, hear. Bloomberg is something 10x richer than Trump and actually earned rather than inherited and squandered it. Bloomberg’s not going to win the primaries but he would scare Trump shitless in a debate.

But he is not a conservative? If he were he wouldn't be crying climate change end of the world.

The post is about Mikes hypocrisy, where as Donald does support this agenda.

First it's "Spot on. Not bad" and now you're not impressed by it. Hmmm

The OP meme was good; your response not so much.

I'd add that "spot on" is in relation to all these other mostly baseless right-wing memes that fill this stream.

Just saw this on Liberal Logic 101. 👍🏽

That reddit?

No, Facebook (their page is public): https://www.facebook.com/pg/LiberalLogic101/posts/

When you're managing a 57 billion dollar empire, a skateboard is out of the question.

Is this what I think it is? Some actual class consciousness on the politics stream? Bravo!