Biden gets free pass, while Trump gets impeached

"I have been discussing about Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden, and Trump trying to get Hunter Biden investigated for his position on an energy corporation in the Ukraine. And that’s led to a call for impeachment and investigation. What’s your take on this story as it’s unfolding?

Douglas Valentine: Well, I actually mentioned Hunter in a passage in my book The CIA as Organized Crime: How Illegal Operations Corrupt America and the World. And you know, Hunter Biden was certainly not the only American to prosper as a result of 20 years of CIA covert operations to pull Ukraine away from the Russian orbit. And once that happened, hundreds of American business people just poured into Ukraine and assumed positions in many corporations. [U.S.-born Natalie] Jaresko….the day that she obtained Ukraine citizenship, she became head of the Ukraine Treasury Department. No, I mean, and this is not America! So, if you started investigating Hunter Biden, then you’ve got to investigate a hundred or a thousand other American business people and political figures who are what I call in my books super-predators who basically operate the way the Mafia does.

You know, they take over governments by twenty years of CIA subversion; blackmailing people and countries, setting them up, overloading them with loans from the IMF or something like that. And then when they can’t pay off their loans, they swoop in like vultures and take over their country and they take over their corporations. And so, what Hunter Biden did, and what I stress in my book: This is just business as usual. The only value it has is, in this war of words that’s being waged between the Republicans and the Democrats, nothing of the CIA’s involvement in setting up these kinds of takeovers in foreign countries is ever, ever going to be revealed."

You do know that the legislature is not a court right? If he's "guilty", there should at least be some evidence, even circumstantial. Do you have any circumstantial evidence of "extortion" as you call it? All the evidence so far points to the fact that they did not feel they were being extorted. The timeline shows it.

Of course he does! His circumstantial evidence of extortion is the idea that /anyone/ would willingly do something for Trump. (Like /let/ him grab them by the pussy, for example).

And "idea" is circumstantial evidence? Go back to sleep to ignoramus. You can't even keep up with the intellectual midgets.

This coming from the guy who can't recognize clear sarcasm.

No, but I thought I made it pretty clear by how sheerly ridiculous it sounds.

Guess I should have known better, to be honest. Nothing is too ridiculous from the left these days.

:)

Ohhh it happened again. I didn't see a different poster entered the flame war....sarcasm not detected. I hereby impeach myself.

It's all good, guess I could have been a little more clear about it too. :-)