Tiny piece of paper

Actually. They don't. An impeachment isn't a criminal trial.

Which explains why they don’t even need a crime to impeach him

An Impeachment is like a Grand Jury. Evidence is gathered. Witnesses are interviewed (but not cross examined by the defense). If the jury decides there's enough evidence to suggest a crime was committed, then the case is referred to prosecution.

So, right now, the House is gathering information. Once the relevant committee's think they've found evidence of a crime, it's referred to a House vote.

If they vote yes, he's impeached. It goes to trial in the Senate.

If they vote no, he has avoided impeachment.

Yeah. Y'all keep going after Hillary and you always come up with 0.

Gag order blocks a congressional investigation?!?

That doesn't make any sense at all.

A gag order can only be issued b a judge to people involved in a case before that judge.

So... the Entire Congress would have to be a party in a case for a judge to have authority over them.

And they could just pass a law that said "lol, nope."

It's a fact Hilldawg bleachbit 30,000 email under subpoena and passed classified intel through a illegal private server. You libs could care less about that tho.

It's a fact that Trump engaged in extortion (a felony) on a national scale, withholding aid to Ukraine until they performed a political favor for him.

So who is the meme about again?

A fact in your and Don Lemon's head maybe. Interesting how they never knew aid was being withheld during that 'extortion'. Biden, on the other hand...

Wow, that's blatantly false. The order to suspend aid came directly from the White House. It's literally his job to be the one who made that call. If the president doesn't even KNOW what the Executive Branch is doing, then we've got even more problems than him shaking down Ukraine - we've got a president who isn't interested in doing his job at all, and staffers doing whatever they want, unchecked.

When Trump made that call, the Ukrainian prez had no idea that aid might be withheld. Trump didn't mention it so where's the blackmail? Where's the quid pro quo?

Trump gave an order that john Brennan's security clearance be revoked and some staffer just took it off his desk and threw it away and Trump did nothing. Heads should have rolled, so yes, that's a problem.

Um.

1) Trump suspends aid.
2) Ukrainian pres agrees to meeting with Trump, to secure aid.
3) Trump requires investigation into a political rival before he's willing to meet with Ukrainian pres about aid.

Whether the Ukrainian pres knew the aid was going to be suspended beforehand is inconsequential. Its absence was used to extort a political favor from a foreign government.

Red herring.

Be specific, please....there have been a few aid packages sent to Pakistan.

You mean like Vice President Biden withholding money until they fired the person investigating his son and then bragging about it?

Sounds like the meme is about Biden.

Quite literally: fake news.

lol fake news besides Biden bragging exactly about that on video.

You mean the one where he's celebrating the success of an international effort to push for the removal of a prosecutor who refused to investigate corruption? That video?

No, the one where he threatens to withold a billion dollars unless they fired the prosecutor who Burisma's lawyers later apologized to for misrepresenting him.

1:20 https://youtu.be/KCF9My1vBP4

If you want me to take you seriously, try citing a source that isn't a Russian state-sponsored propaganda machine.

https://www.businessinsider.com/youtube-is-the-propaganda-vehicle-of-choice-for-russias-rt-lawmakers-say-2019-10

It says something that that's the only search on youtube that comes up with it on the 1st 2 pages.

https://youtu.be/UXA--dj2-CY

If you haven't seen it, it's worth a look.

So you DO mean the one where he's celebrating the success of an international effort to push for the removal of a prosecutor who refused to investigate corruption. I thought so.

The American lawyer team from Burisma APOLOGIZED to him. Look it up. I know CNN doesn't report it.

I see John Soloman making claims, and citing evidence that only exists in the public eye in the form of a one-page document that was 1) uploaded by him, and 2) not a copy of the original, but rather a translation of the original that he created. I don't see anyone else making this claim based on any other evidence.

But hey, it helps the narrative, so it must be true, right?

I knew you'd do that. So now a person's own words are fake news if published by a source you don't like. Sad.

I see the RT logo in the corner and I immediately turn it off, every time.

You don't know the Burisma lawyer apologized for smearing him :)

That's cute you think there was a worldwide effort to end this corrupt prosecutor's career. You've been propagandized.

Erm. Public records.

Good on you for knowing Solomon. We can agree to disagree, bud.

I'll settle for that.

Whatever makes you feel better about yourself, dude.

Cute. A flat-out lie, but cute.

No more fake than Trump’s alleged extortion.

😂