Racism Exposed

Go hump someone else's leg.

Two different things though. The national anthem itself, and the act of /standing/ for the anthem.

It says racist a bunch of times too. Context matters:

"Stand for anthem" is different than "the national anthem". One is an action performed by a patriot, the other is a song.

sources cited btw

Voter ID:
https://www.apnews.com/1bb3f03073ae4f2bbac15dc7d7c89549

Build the wall:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/24/opinion/trump-wall-shutdown.html

Deport criminal aliens:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/trump-administration-to-expand-its-power-to-deport-undocumented-immigrants/2019/07/22/76d09bc4-ac8e-11e9-bc5c-e73b603e7f38_story.html

Replace Obamacare:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2017/05/05/obamacare-repeal-based-racial-resentment/iVNtB9fpr3JNm7IKfYyorK/story.html

It goes on and on. This is tedious - you can do your own research.

i dont think ive heard a single liberal say 'two biological genders is racist', nor 'freedom', nor 'right to life', nor 'freedom of speech', nor 'believe in god' (i think youll find there are liberals who have a monotheistic religion), nor 'legal immigration'. in fact i dont even think that 'stand for anthem' or ' the national anthem' have been called racist. you get scoffs at the irony at the end of it, but not, 'THAT'S RACIST REEEEE'

now to review the articles youve mentioned
Voter ID: It's free if you ignore all the costs to get one, and putting a price on voting is a big no-no inofitself. It's more anti-poor people (because theyll probably vote democrat) and a racial bias stems from that because there are more poor black people. so that article is saying something factual, other than implying that o'bourke is good cause hes garbage

Build the wall: i suspect you didnt read it, and if you did you closed your ears cause it's a fair argument and has links in the text to support its claims

Deport criminal aliens: the article mentions race twice, one says theres a possible concern for racial profiling, and the other is an actual quote saying the immigration bill stems from racist rhetoric from the president. the article itself isnt making the case that the policy is racist, just reporting on whats going on. nothing wrong with denying people the opportunity to defend themselves in court and just chuck them out anyway :/.

Replace Obamacare: i think it makes good points but i dont think it really addresses anything about racism and the thing talking about racism about obama is sourced to the washington post which has a paywall so L.

tl;dr: lol read it :/

Voter ID: you're saying black people are too poor to get a drivers license, because that's the ID that people want to require. It is to be tied to state issued ID/drivers licenses....just like Real ID (which is already implemented in most states)

Build the wall: Criminal isn't a race

So sad you can't figure out how to get past a paywall (hint: pretend to be Google and they'll let you right in)

People have said milk is racist, correct spelling, the nuclear family, being on time is racist.....the list goes on and on. Thankfully, because the list goes on and on - it's easy to dismiss any and all claims of racism, because the term has been used up. It's been so diluted that it has no meaning anymore.

Thank you liberals, for overplaying your hand.

Not everyone needs a drivers license to live. Most people still have two functioning legs in spite our poor health care system. Failing that there are alternative options. Public transportation, carpooling. Driving is a privilege, not a right. Voting is a right, not a privilege. It's the same with guns. People love to compare guns with cars and until some moron changes the Second Amendment, then voting and gun ownership should have little to no barriers at all standing in the way.

But they need ID to receive welfare....and to buy guns....cigarettes, alcohol, dirty magazines, open a bank account, buy windshield washer fluid, buy paint, rent an apartment, take a drug test..... Nobody objects to an ID requirement for anything else.

You do not need an ID to open a bank account, buy windshield washer fluid, or buy paint. That other stuff? Yeah. Probably. Though I didn't need an ID to buy all of my guns but I occasionally buy at gun shows so... People do object to ID requirements almost every damn the day. I highly recommend working as a cash register sometime, especially at a liquor store. Never underestimate the power of stupidity.

winter mix windshield washer fluid contains alcohol, the register asks the cashier to confirm I'm over 21 - one look at this grandfather answers that question. And ID has been required to buy spray paint for at least 20 years (because of huffing). Try opening a bank account without ID - I dare you. When opening an account in person, most banks require two forms of identification such as a Social Security card, driver's license, state ID, passport or birth certificate. I had to show ID for every gun I've ever bought, even from private sellers - so I don't know what kind of shady arms dealers you deal with, but people interested in obeying the law ask for ID.

But what do I know, I've only been adulting for 30 years.

When I was a young man, all you needed to open a bank account was money. It is entirely possible that’s changed since my accounts are probably older than you are. You must not go to many gun shows, we have a lot of them in my state. And guns are sold, traded, and bought with little to no paperwork what so ever. Ah, the Bible Belt. Sometimes it’s a blessing. Then you try to buy cooking wine on Sunday and it all goes to shit. State laws are funny like that.

I buy paint and spray paint all the time. Air spray cans too. No ID required. I would happily tell you what state I’m from but I’m afraid common sense dictates that to be an awful idea. Just trust me. You must live in a very Blue state. I’m very sorry to hear that and can understand your frustration at Democrats.

Mine is the reddest state, and people from my state are constantly called racists.