The claim keeps getting made, but never with any proof of it being true...

Except I’m not a racist.

Just curious, what does it take for you to believe someone is a racist?

What'll it take for YOU to denounce /Hillary/ as a racist?

Hillary is an awful person. Don't know about racist. What does she have to do with this conversation?

Hillary may not be a racist but if Trump said what she said, you'd be all over it.

Well, that doesn't tell me much?

I'm just saying Hillary said things, that I wouldn't crucify her for, but going by the left's standards, had Trump or any white republican had said, it's all we'd hear about.

And I'm saying, what things?

Ahhh. Hot sauce, 'super predators', all look the same etc. Things I never heard liberals complain about or ever mention.

3 possibilities. 1. You've got nothin. Can't think of anything.
2. Don't want to waste your time listing something.
3. Forgot the 3rd by the time I got here because I don't much care either.

"But we also have to have an organized effort against gangs," Hillary Clinton said in a C-SPAN video clip. "Just as in a previous generation we had an organized effort against the mob. We need to take these people on. They are often connected to big drug cartels, they are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called superpredators — no conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why they ended up that way, but first, we have to bring them to heel."

She was not talking about, "black" children here.

Can't find anything on hot sauce other than she's a hot sauce connoisseur with a collection of over 200 varieties. Something I didn't care to know.

You have to admit, this is pretty tame stuff. It doesn't compare with losing in court for keeping blacks out of your housing.

She wasn't /overtly/ talking about black children, but any "liberal" would see the obvious /covert/ message about the "brown kids".

The hot sauce thing is because while speaking to a crowd of black people, she made sure to mention she "always carried a bottle of hot sauce in her bag". Something I haven't heard of her mentioning when speaking to a crowd of white people. At worst it's playing on a stereotype, at best it's pandering.

And let's not forget her ties to Robert Byrd, an /old/ family friend, founder and grand cyclops of a chapter of the KKK, and a man who, even after he "changed his mind" and became liberal, filibustered /against/ the civil rights act being passed.

This may sound bad, (because it actually is bad), but I'm pretty sure that at the time at least, having black people move into an area almost invariably lowered property values. While racism is largely to blame for something like that, that doesn't automatically mean Trump himself is inherently racist. He's a businessman, he follows the profits.

That doesn't excuse what he did in that housing issue, but it's a false flag the left use to portray him as purely a racist, instead of as a soulless, money-hungry profiteer.

Direct and specific rejection of a person based on the color of their skin (shade of brown since we’re all brown). Races are man made constructs clearly. We are all one race. So racism is a misnomer. Not rejection based on other factors for someone who happens to be a different color. That’s what the left is using to declare anything racist.

Sorry but that is the biggest pile of shit I've seen in awhile. No one can be racist because we all are the same same. Maybe double speak and gaslighting works for this President and his deplorables but the rest of the world knows BS when they see it.

Fact. We’re all one race. Period. You twisted what I said as usual.

imgflip.com/i/36gpq9

36gpq9.jpg (click to show)

No, you just backed up what I said. Thank you.

Glad you agree with me.

Incorrect.

Obama not proving his birth raises questions among us non racists. Not because of skin color, but because lack of proof.

Calling those countries that had nothing to do with race.

See, here's the problem: indirect and non-specific rejection of people is very clearly also a problem - but conveniently, you don't want it to count.

But it does.

But it’s not due to race or skin color. Glad you agree.

I've agreed to nothing, thanks.

Oh, if you don’t agree with the truth you admit you’re wrong. Still mature of you.

I've admitted to nothing and the comments stand for people who want to see that for themselves.

Yep. And the comments definitely declare the meme 100% correct. Still no proof of racism at all. Just hollow claims.

Because you're ignoring them and calling them hollow.

And none of those are, so if they were everyone would know it, not just the looney left.

Because reality is they aren’t racist. Thanks for playing. You lose.

Except when they are and everyone knows it.

You said "also a problem", which is tacitly admitting that it is a separate problem from racism, thus you agreed with klkitchens_memer.

No, it's not, at all.

What should be in that jar:

Stripping Refugees of their rights to apply for asylum.
Detaining foreign visitors at the border.
Stripping Natural Born Citizens of their rights.
Stripping Citizenship of children born outside of the US, even though one or more of their parents are
US Citizens.

None of those is racism.

Yes, they are.

Nope. Border security is not racist. In order:

Asylum seekers bypassed too many other countries.
Detaining illegals not racist.
Doubtfully done, but if you mean anchor babies, they aren’t natural born.
Cite examples.

Clear is racist

Yes! So you agree then that based on what he's said and done that he's not racist. Because, as in the OP, there is no evidence of things he's said or done. Just vile, false conjecture.

as I said b4, Real "Racists" do not want to share a water fountain with Black ppl let alone a life and marriage bed. I think ppl mistake "being an asshole" sometimes with racism

there are subtle levels of racism.
and not all are Nazi level eugenics.
which it appears is the only level that you would find a definitive example.

I do not understand the knee jerk defense of someone who,by his words,is obviously biased and holds deep prejudice.while not eugenics level,it is glaringly apparent.

I also do not understand those who knee jerk to accuse,based on a very human proclivity for bias and prejudice.

we all hold our own biases and prejudice.
it is human.
this is self evident,and non-controversial.

but the shrill shrieking of those who would defend,or accuse,drown out those of us who are more reasonable in our approach.

just because trump had a relationship with a black woman,(who is not very black,let's be honest) does not automatically dismiss his very prejudiced and biased words.
and to make this false equivalency is falling into the:
"I have a black friend,therefore I cannot be racist".
yes...you can.

but I agree with you,IF I accepted your metric of "real racists".
which I guess would be the neo-nazis and white nationalists?
on those grounds...sure...trump is a peace loving hippy.

but racism is far more subtle,and it appeals to our tribalist nature.
it is quiet prejudices,and a bias towards anything "different" or "other".

and that is a personal journey.
one of self discovery and reflection.
and ya know what? having a black friend can certai ly help that journey along.
just my .02

"simplify things" Einstein . as I said b4, maybe he is just an asshole.
He has said mean things to every race equally.
The same example is solid, thats why i use it.
I have know real racists, they would not shake hands with other races let alone kiss them.

I know and I am not necessarily disagreeing with your broader point.
I am simply pointing to human nature and the subtletly of racism aka:tribalism.

reductionist,binary,either/or arguments ignore the deeper implications.
humans be complicated yo

he is an equal opportunity asshole.

but the boss needs to be an asshole sometimes.

He gives an example of Trump NOT being a racist. You give NO example of him being one. Just psychobabble and lies.

you keep trying little one!!!
and one day you can sit at the big boy table!!

red and I had a discussion,offering points of consideration.
you offered nothing.

go back and watch your cartoons ya child.
this is a big boy conversation.

Um, it's MY conversation... you chose to butt in. And as I proved in the meme, you offer NOTHING in the way of proof. When called on it, you just fire insults (and not very good or clever ones at that). So tata... go elsewhere if you want to have a meaningless conversation without substance.

please,by all means,continue with your cult of personality and avoid any and all offerings of context and nuance.

oh,and by the way..
I never actually called trump a racist.
but I did,however,point to his obvious bias and prejudice.
which is a human trait and manifests in varying degrees.
something you conveniently ignored to cling to your own narrative.

muppets gotta muppet though,don't they? #sad
#senstivesnowflakes #complexideasconfusethem

No... you simply swapped the word "racist" with "bias and prejudice" still offering ZERO examples (and since there are none that are apparent, you cannot)...

conflating racism with bias and predjudice.
wow...just..wow.
that's just..
wow..

ok buddy.
got no interest in humiliating on a public forum someone who is obviously lacking in basics.

you have yourself a fantastic day.
#trump2020

Glad to see you admit to losing the argument. Have a wonderful day.

Racism is both bias and prejudice. What do you think they used to call racism before the word was invented? You're basically arguing over how to pronounce tomato.

all those words and yet....zero evidence, far less proof

I wasn't offering proof,nor even an accusation.

what I was offering is the contextualized distinctions between outright racist and the human trait of bias and predjudice.

why is this very simple concept confusing the muppet class so much?

red got it at least.thank god for that.
although he attributes that human facet as being an asshole lol.
which is fair..and kinda funny.

And yet, you still fail to offer proof he's biased and prejudiced any more than yourself.

so now you want to attempt a rhetorical style.
I would advise against that,because while ben shapiro is a master in that style.
you are no ben shapiro.

you also do not seem to not only understand racism,but also human biases and prejudices based on regional and cultural factors.

but you are really good at whinging.(word of the day kids).

now I wasn't accusing trump of racism but rather expressing a very human trait of being biased and prejudiced,and his words are pretty non-controversial in that regard.
it is obvious to those who do not engage in identity politics and partisan hackery.(that would be me btw,not you..you are an incredibly unaware identitarian).

but you f**ked up.
you switched "racist" for "biased and prejudiced".to which there is a plethora of quotable quotes to sift through to quantify that particular claim.

bias and prejudice against immigrants?
we have that:

https://www.newsweek.com/trumps-full-list-racist-comments-about-immigrants-muslims-and-others-779061

bias and prejudice against other races and cultures? we got that too!

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-racist-examples_n_56d47177e4b03260bf777e83

midnight tweets revealing prejudices?
yep..we have that as well:
https://www.ibtimes.com/donald-trump-racist-15-controversial-quotes-president-elect-said-about-blacks-2447531

does this all mean the Donald trump is an actual racist?
maybe unintentionally,but I think it safe to say that he holds very deep biases and prejudices against certain groups,cultures and religions based on stereotypical understandings.
which every one of us hold to varying degrees.

which was my point from the get-go.
a point,i might add,that thoroughly and completely went over your head.

you gonna whinge some more muppet man?
or is all this just psychobabble and lies?

from what I have seen from you today?
the latter.
absolutely the latter.
because partisan hackery means never admitting you were wrong...…..ever.

toodles dipshit.

Looking at the newsweek piece, there are like maybe two questionable comments there. But nothing that says he's racist (their claim).

So the meme still wins.

There is no more proof possible to give you. No one can look into the mind of another so the jar is always empty except in extreme circumstances of proof, like men hanging from trees and gas chambers.

Throughout history humans have used another simple mechanism to know the mind of another. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck, a normal individual without bias, prejudice or racism, (which are all forms of the same thing) can assume it is a duck.

Right. There is no proof. He’s not done or said anything racist that we’ve seen.

That's not what I said at ALL!

There is plenty of proof he's a racist. If he isn't, he's doing a great job at keeping the support of racists. Either way, it's not good.

Great example of gaslighting.

sounds like typical libtard shit-flinging to me

anything that challenges your teeny weeny echo chamber simply HAAAAAS to be "libtard",because actually critically examining an issue with your own flavor of identity politics and partisan ra-ra goteam whatever,would mean actually using the grey matter between your eyes.

/pfffffft
fart noise
non-contributing know-nothings who only know how to vomit the current rhetoric.
how unoriginal.

Isn't that always the case? How many times has anyone read the mind of another?

there are subtle levels of accusation.
and not all are Marxist level infantile.

https://i.imgflip.com/398eqb.jpg