He does poke them in the eye occasionally...

Under international law, asylum seekers are supposed to apply for asylum in the first safe country they arrive in.

ie not march hundreds of miles through Mexico and other countries just to go specifically to the US.

You are quite misinformed there sir Taleladar. International law demands no such thing, maybe you are confusing EU-policy?

lol maybe that is EU only policy? And if that's the case, and the US isn't bound by such agreements, then WHERE would it say anywhere that the US is obligated to take in asylum seekers from distant countries in the first place?

Friend, I see you have limited knowledge about international law so I'm going to leave it here. I am not a teacher so I won't explain it to you, I ain't got the time to anyway, but I suggest you do some research, get back to me then and we can discuss this if you like.

The U.S. is bound to accept asylum seekers in both international and federal law. The U.S. is definitely bound by international law, it has ratified these agreements, so it certainly is bound by them. I'd recommend reading this: https://ijrcenter.org/refugee-law/

EU-policy states that when an asylum seeker enters any country in the EU, that is the country they need to seek asylum in, they can't wander through the EU to a different EU country to seek asylum. If they do they are returned to the first EU-country they entered, seeing as getting residency in one EU country entitles you to freely move within the whole EU.

The the states of the U.S. are much more integrated than in the EU, thus this policy is not really useful there, but one could compare it to if you enter the U.S. through Texas you are not allowed to move to another state to seek asylum.

Anyhow have a good day Taleladar.

So... if you could just point to someplace in US law, not an activist website that has a bunch of links to UN related stuff, that would be great.....

🤣😁😂😅😆😄

Once again...your proof only proves you're ignorance. The resort made no profit and charged only the cost, which was significantly less than other resorts would charge. You don't even read your own BS.

This link doesn't show any wrong doing, only a biased piece that show his business interests making money...Are they supposed to be going broke? If he's not running them, then...what's your beef? Just more unsubstantiated claims from you lefty sources.

Fair enough. I was mistaken. Trump didn't divest but did sign over is control. Divesting isn't required, so I don't see why this is such a bid deal to you. He isn't making a profit from the companies when they do business with ours or foreign governments based on the same article you posted. So if he isn't profiting, what's your issue, aside from the fact that you're still peeved that you can't do Melania and he gets to?

Without evidence to the contrary, yeah. Nothing illegal or immoral about it. And....it wasn't even required by law, so in this he went beyond what was required to shut up shrills like yourself, who demanded he do something no one else was required to do. No where does it state that to be president one has to divest of everything he has that made him who he is. He came into office a billionaire and will leave much poorer. You can't say that for Obama and other previous presidents..or for congress who seem to get rich just by getting elected.

Being a skeptic doesn't make your belief any more logical. Until you can substantiate your claims that he is somehow getting richer off the country, then it us just a claim...and like I said, there is no law that says you can't make money while in office. Ask any politician who came in poor and is now a multimillionaire. The emoluments clause..please. Only die hard koolaid drinking lefties still talk about that ancient unused legislation. Those claims have fallen by the wayside with all your other tin-hat conspiratorial nonsense. I guess you still believe the Russians got him elected too. Where did that investigation go? Tick Tock...isn't that your mantra? Your clock is broke.

We all know you're secretly in love with her.