Memes

The KKK was founded and populated by DEMOCRATS

Look up the term "moby" in urban dictionary.

As I've said many times, even made a meme about it, I put forth the theory that the KKK is in fact a moby for the democratic party.

That's my theory, yes. I mean, do you really think the KKK doesn't /know/ that they actively hurt the political chances of anyone they endorse?

Also, I think you made a huge logical misstep in your reasoning there. Who said they weren't actually part of that group? Just because I claim the KKK is a moby for the democrats, doesn't mean they're not actually a bunch of racist shitlords. That's the whole point, they ARE. I didn't say people were pretending to be members of the KKK on behalf of the democrats, I said the KKK itself is a tool of the democrats.

Dems (the core ones at least, the ones in power, not the "civilians" or "normies" such as yourself) are just as racist today as they were in the days of slavery. They just hide it a lot better, although not perfectly. As Malcolm X said, they're better at /pretending/ to be the friends of minorities. That's why democratic policies have done far more harm than good to the black community.

"The white liberal is the worst enemy to America, and the worst enemy to the black man." ~Malcolm X

That's why black people have, on average, grown more and more poor ever since the so-called "switch", and why 99% of ghettos/projects/inner cities where black people live in extreme poverty are in areas run by democrats.

I didn't say the neo-nazis, I said the KKK, the ones with the white hoods.

the democrats STAYED democrats even after the KKK fell apart kiddo, so no. You see, conservatives wouldn't like slavery cause it was costly and anti-capitalistic. As in wasteful with money.

im saying that what it was capitalists who wanted the abolish it, and liberalists wanted to keep it. Conservatives would have also opposed slavery due to financial interests in the markets.

um ok guy, No. Slavery requires VOLUNTARY association and PROFIT.

slavery requires a tremendous amount of expenses and a small profit margin, this is why the cotton gin was invented, because slavery was not profitable. Slaves needed to be clothed, bought, fed and sheltered which costs a lot of money and is consistent year round. I am a capitalist, I know this shit, its literally in my name. AncapDeist, Ancap= anarcho capitalism. Like I also said, slavery is anti capitalistic as it is not voluntary, capitalism is bound by a set of moral and ethical principles called the NAP which by its very nature, forbids slavery.

no, capitalism, like I said, requires voluntary processes and is therefore not compatible with slavery. And like I also said, its quite expensive to maintain slaves.If the expenses are more costly than the profit, this is a loss and slavery also can lead to this, which is why the cotton gin was created. Slavery requires FORCE and AGGRESSION to be properly maintained and this in itself is anti-capitalistic.

"cap·i·tal·ism
/?kap?dl?iz?m/Submit
noun

an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state."

yes, this is correct. but its missing the part where it also requires voluntary association rather than by force.

It requires no so thing. It only requires ownership of the means to make profit.

Slaves were owned and utilized to generate profit, like any beast of burden. Crops don't volunteer either.
Chattel is chattel.

This is going nowhere, and it is debating something that is irrelevent to the issue. Capitalism, in essence, can be described as theft. No disqualifications for stealing one's time or liberty.

this is absolutely false and observably so, slavery cannot be compatible with capitalism as it is

1) not voluntary labor, capitalism REQUIRES voluntary labor

2) not even profitable, as it was time consuming and a burden of expenses

so for you to sit there, and say that capitalism is "theft" you best have some good go***mn evidence. Oh and there IS penalties for theft in a capitalist society, its called the Non Aggression Principle, which allows for defense of property and life in the event of aggression being enacted.

Its wuite clear to me that you don't actually know WHAT capitalism even is or HOW it works and whatever source your using is horse shit. It sounds like a bunch of socialist propaganda mixed with apologetics. Hell, id go as far as to say that you claiming that the most free and helpful economic practice in history is "theft" , shows how little you actually understand this world.

Voluntary what? Like oxen dragging a plow? Horses doing the same or pulling a cart with goods to the market? Children helping at their parents store? Chain gangs - which was introduced after slavery ended to fulfill the same role, but at taxpayer expense? Machines?

Slaves not only were part of the profit making process for plantation owners (generally the wealthiest capitalists around), but traded as a commodity themselves, with banking and insurance industries growing around them.

this is still not capitalistic, as capitalism requires voluntary interactions and association, slavery isn't voluntary, this is not capitalism.

however, to talk about your "cahain gangs" point, that is the governments doing, meaning that it was Govt that allowed and maintained both slavery and forced prison labor. Capitalism doesnt require nor need govt involvement, so actually it was CORPORATISM that liked slavery.

This guy is unwavering with his bucket of hooey.
He knows even more than the dictionary. Impressive.

*capitalism requires voluntary association and profit.

#EditButton, jesus Christ, this is twitter all over again

You realize you're confusing CONserve with PREserve, right?

Exactly how much increased profits do you think there were? Black slaves were quite expensive to buy, (around $100 and UP, depending on "quality", plus black slaves were considered more valuable, and treated better than, Irish slaves), let alone feed and house year round. (And even clothe, to a minor degree).

Compare that to the relative weekly income of paid labor at the time, which if I'm not mistaken was around $0.50 to $1.00 per week, (and that paid labor used their own wages to pay for their own food and homes and sundry). That would mean slaves were a net loss for several years.

Feed them chitlings and chicken legs, the unwanted leftovers. That's why those are popular with people descended from that, it's what they ate back then, they got used to it.

Not only was slavery money making for slave owners, the buying and selling of them itself was big business. It sired the banking, insurance companies, and commodities that made London the economic center it was then and today. It would still be an ambling backwater today if it wasn't for the slave trade.

Would you consider the Quakers conservative?

The current Republican party isn't the true party of Lincoln. https://www.thenation.com/article/when-republicans-really-were-party-lincoln/

The original Republicans were fiercely liberal. That all changed after the civil rights movement.

OATS!

Pennsylvania (Penn's woods translation) was given to William Penn's father by the king.He was a Quaker. They are pacifist . PA was always a vehement anti-slavery state. ffwd to 19th century, The Quakers were all abolitionist . Underground railroad "stops" or safe houses were all code name for "Quaker meeting" houses and were a huge part of the underground RR. One of the big Quaker graveyards is in my hometown and my BFF's uncle was caretaker . writer James Mischener was a Quaker who stayed at the estate house once. Their number's are small , dont think they are big on sex,procreation only. Not to be confused with the "Shakers" who were similar but believed in abstinence so they died out (big flaw).

yes big time, william penn made sure Pa was always had it banned

This site never ceases to amaze for sheer ridiculousness.

Your trolling is too overt.