Bill Nye The Science Guy

Show the same graph with earth's temperature added and get back to me...

Showing a graph that leaves out half the data and thinking that its showing anything factual is not proving your argument. Insinuating 98% of PhDs on the planet agree with the global warming narrative doesn't actually mean they do.
All you have presented is a graph of CO2 with no correlation to temperature. And a insinuation about what people with PhDs believe, not even PhDs in science or climate related science, just PhDs lol..

I dont know why you're wasting your time trying to make an argument with no actual facts either. Don't you have something better to do like look at your genitals in the mirror and try to figure out what gender you feel like?

"Don't you have something better to do like look at your genitals in the mirror and try to figure out what gender you feel like?"
when you tear liberals apart with facts XDDDDD

"I dont know why you're wasting your time trying to make an argument with no actual facts either."

Did you really manage to say that to one of the most leftist users on imgflip and keep a straight face?

I love getting them riled up

You dont know much about that 98% and what that actually means, do you.

Omg did you know that someone looked at climate science studies and made an assessment, assumption that 98% of climate scientists agreed with their point of view??? Wow never mind those scientists denying that assessment made on their findings omg... it would probably have been more credible if they, you know, like, contacting each climate scientist and asked them what they thought was causing climate change... but whatever, assessments may not be as accurate as an actual survey or anything, but who cares omg.. oh golly gee wiz beep beep boop boop...

Dont you people have any actual facts? Maybe you should stick to a topic you know well like gender studies or a metoo movement. You could even run around wearing a fat vag on your head

Most people dont look into what the "98%" of scientists number actually means. They push a false narrative. Great meme

About time someone mentioned that.

I know that even the 3% leftover are smarter than you right wing whackos here. - Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

Hmmm who to believe, NASA and EVERY legit science organisation OR some right wing nitwits following a hoax that was started BY THE VERY SAME GUY who said that smoking was safe and the link to cancer was a hoax and would cost jobs.... too funny.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/01/06/97-of-climate-scientists-agree-is-100-wrong/amp/

Read this link or not I dont care. Climate scientists from the article, in your link, are on record saying they were not in agreement of the assessment made on their findings.
What you have presented, is a survey done on an assessment of findings, who ever does the assessment is the interpreter of the findings so therefore all you have is an interpretation of findings from one source. Wow. Good luck with your debunked garbage assessment article. Heaven forbid someone actually contacts all these climate scientists and asked them what they believe. Wouldn't want to lose that nice 97% assessment number now would you... pathetic.

Too stupid to find it on your own?

Nice colorful graph you got there. It's a shame it doesn't show the correlation between CO2 and temperature... get back to me when you find one, or dont, I dont care

i bet he thinks i cant say the nword as well >:((

There you go parroting that 98% again with no proof to back up that claim. I like how it went from 98% of just any old person with PhDs to now 98% of scientists, and you have no idea what a scientist actually is.
Calling someone a flat earther because you are lacking any actual facts doesn't actually mean you have actual facts. ..
And nobody's denying the climate is changing so I'm not really sure if you even know what you are arguing here...