Red Background

Amen!!

Progressivism is the support for or advocacy of improvement of society by reform. As a philosophy, it is based on the idea of progress, which asserts that advancements in science, technology, economic development and social organization are vital to the improvement of the human condition.

I don't know what you're talking about.

Which has included and still does: racism, eugenics, and anti-science, scientism, ammorality, immorality and much of the misery and agony in the world. Woodrow Wilson is considered to be the first American president to usher in progressivism and he was one of - if not the most racist president we have ever had. So, it sound nice but it is full of euphemisms and like most of their programs, they deliver the opposite of what was promised. Case in point - ACA. War on Poverty. Freedom of Choice. Reproductive Choice. Utter disasters these have been and caused the loss of millions of lives. Other than that, it's great!!

Lol, its not that they are brainwashed by MSM, its that it is obvious what party is better 4 their interests

Actually, has the DNC been better? Since the migration to the DNC happened in the 1960s, the black family has been decimated and is practically non existent and it is reeping the terrors of fatherlessness. The stats will make you cry and it's the number one issue in the black community - fatherlessness. That is - children growing up without a father in the home. These children are 20 x more likely to do prison time.

Did you read what I was responding to?

"Did you read what I was responding to?" Yes. "Outlaw abortion=more fatherless children" It's a problem in suburban black culture, so any abortion laws are irrelevant to the topic at hand.

?

What I said.

A fetus is fully developed at around the seventh month. This is the only reason why I support abortions from month one to six.

Isn't that the law?

And let's keep it that way.

What does being "fully developed" has to do with the subject? If you are saying that it's ok to kill humans who aren't fully developed then it would include teens. You might want ot rethink that.

So, location is what gives a human value? If a human being didn't have value in the womb then how does a 9 inch journey down the birth canal magically bestows rights and value to us? I could agree with you if the unborn were not human. If the unborn are human then why don't they have value and rights? A set of judges once determined that Blacks weren't valuable and had no rights because of their skin color. Seems we are human regardless of size, location, development, dependency of skin color.

Our opinions are irrelevant on this subject. There is no such thing as a fertilized egg. Science has confirmed long ago that life begins at conception. Science has also confirmed that at conception that we are complete, living and whole. We are simply not developed yet. No outside parts are added to us - just nurishment. This is 6th grade biology. While you aren't judging based on skin color, you are judging based on other criteria and that criteria is subjective - subjective as skin color. I'm not saying that you are a mean person but you are saying that a person can be killed because ..... (fill in the blank).

I am not interested in your opinion or any one elses on this matter. The fact is that from the moment of conception, we are complete, living and whole. That is the science of the matter. And again, a 2 year old isn't fully developed either and they have rights. So, your criteria fails and it makes you no different from the judges who used the skin criteria for determining the humanity of fellow humans. I agree with you in that those judges were wrong though. So, why are you falling into the very same ideology? You are doing so by coming up with an arbitrary bar which one must have in order to have a right to life. How about all humans should have a right to life based on the mere fact that they are human? Lack of development doesn't change that fact and neither does location.

That's because of the 60s cultural revolution. Blacks were always behind because Slavery decimated family structure.

The rise of the New Black Panther Party also made a huge divide.

What? That is a fringe group. It has nothing to do with it?!

????

New Black Panther Party doesn't really have much to do with the average black American

That's why I said New Black Panther Party.

What are you basing that on? It's false. The family structure of blacks was far more stable in 1900 than it is today. It began to decline in the 1960s and has continually declined since the "war on poverty" which increased government dependence. It included financial incentives for not having a father inthe home - thus replacing the father with a government paycheck. Please don't take my word for this - look it up. Go watch the 70s movie Claudine.

I'm not saying that saying that the war on poverty hasn't made things much worse, but let's look at the root. Every race gets equal welfare opportunities. Why are blacks the only race over represented on welfare. 40% of those on welfare are black. Why is it such a black issue. What makes them different? How about the fact that their families were systematically ripped apart during the times of slavery. The problem with your logic is because everybody got welfare, there is no reason it is such a black issue. Unless of course you believe that black people are genetically less inclined to hard work, but that is false and racist.

Ahh, so you are getting back to saying that Black culture is responsible, including recent immigrants from Africa.

How am i trolling?

How am I trolling. I am discussing with somebody who cares and wants to read what I have to say

Then why are you responding here and saying im "getting back to" it? It was a month ago. I guess I misspoke in a way that could have been misinterpreted. Sorry im not racist. I love the blacks and always had a good relation with the blacks. Even some of my friends are black :P

Your lame attempts at trolling are, well, lame.

No way you read it retard. R-e-a-D. Don't they have high literacy rates in Estonia? In the comment above I said it is because of slavery. I said it couldn't be welfare because every race gets welfare. I said an explanation could be that blacks are inferior but that is false and racist. Next time read it instead of spewing racism accusations you malfunctioning bot. A bit less vodka before your daily botting.

Look at the lying dingbat get triggered.

You know what I'm referring to, and it isn't your comment here.

Idiot.

Great questions. Human nature. Blacks started voting Dem in the 1930-40s due to handouts. When JFK made a phone call to get MLK out of jail in 1960, it sealed the deal. When you add the lies and their blaming their history on others, and hiding it 95% vote DNC.

Of course slavery broke up families but the claim was that slavery decimated the family structure but that was DURING slavery, so it doesn't explain the 74% out of wedlock birth rate today.

So what does? Why did they need handouts in the first place in the 1930s? Slavery. Yes, most blacks vote blue cuz they love handouts, but why? I didnt know even in the 30s, but that makes sense. Slavery is still the root cause. When you never had a father, none of your brothers had a father, none of your cousins had a father because he was ripped away, wouldn't you think it is okay? Little things imposed upon people can have great effects. Engagement in premarital sex was rampant in slaves, as they were treated as animals. When they got their freedom, there was a natural reaction to try to keep families together, being socially necessary in the real, free world. When that was lost in the 60s, they couldn't handle it.

Handouts in the 30s? You do know that there was a depression, right? Government promises to take care of people appeals to people's sense of security. You are correct in that this is affecting all races but when one adds the Civil Rights and Voter Rights bills along with the "War on Poverty" it has caused major governmental dependence. LBJ knew this when he said that he would have blacks(N-word is what he said) voting Democrat for the next 200 years.

Slavery ended in 1865 and Blacks were right there with other groups in 1940 and even in 1900. We have been free for a long time. Look at what happens on the graph and WHEN it happens.

That's not exactly what you said last month. Something about their culture, including that of a Nigerian immigrant you know who wants to remain in the ghetto because he shares that anti-hard work culture you said they have?

Thats the opposite of what I meant. I was very specific in America ghetto black culture.

You're lying again. MAJORITY culture, as you specifically put it.

Between the lies and backpedaling and being two faced, you and Grind have a lot in common.

I'm his moslem buddy now :P

His Satanic buddy as he would put it, who was trying to get me to go at you the other day too?

Great question - It was Republicans who fought for Civil Rights - against Democrats. Democrats love to hide being the "progressive/liberal crap but Woodrow Wilson was a racist and the other big one was FDR who appointed a Klan attorney to the Supreme court. I think they were called PROGRESSIVES. They should be called REGRESSIVES.

In 1948? The 1960s?

It has always been Republicans. Even in the 60s - a higher percentage of Republicans voted for the Civil Rights and Voter Rights bills in 1964-65. The ex-KKK recruiter, Robert Byrd fillibustered the Civil Rights Bill - He was a Democrat and Hillary Clinton's mentor - in her own words in 2010 when he died. LBJ was heard saying that he would have those "N-WORDs" voting Democrat for the next 200 years - after his infamous War on Poverty programs were implimented.

No. And still no.
The mid 1960s are still so over a half century ago. The 1860s, a century and a half. See how this works?

Ratios within parties don't pass legislation, tallied votes do.

What does Hillary have to do with any of it, other than being what, 10 in 1965? Seriously, she lost, and even if Trump was imprisoned on Elba, she's still not taking his seat, get over it, take her poster down from your wall, Putin is safe.

Oh, and don't forget to tell racist white Southerners they're supposed to be voting Democrat, not Abolitionist Party. They truly can't be so stupid that they forgot to vote for that Grand Dragon from Soviet Kenya, Barack HUSSEIN-N-N-N-N Obama.

I'm not sure as to what you are saying no to but you might want to check your math on Hillary's age in 1965. But that is a side issue - Byrd was a racist Democrat and was her mentor. Go look it up. The other big point is that the Democrats and their followers seem to have a blind spot as to their own racism. Imagine if Donald Trump said in 2010 that an obvious racist was his mentor. The media and the DNC would have crucified him.

As for ratios, the point is that it is BS when the DNC wants to brag about how they are the ones who have primarily fought for Civil rights of Blacks and the RNC is racist.

Not sure as to your last point.

You mean like David Duke?
Oh yeah, that.

Numbers, guy, numbers, not percentages of the party that ditched its ideals in favor of Goldwater Conservatism.

Of course you're not.
See you're comment about the GOP's favorite Kenyan.

Eugenics also. Because nothing says progressive like sterilizing the lesser races to make the world safe for WASPs.

Millions of lifes lost becuase of progressives which just so happen to stand for the same thing as regressives do with conservativatism.

Weird, though I reedited that last line. Maybe I was gonna then had to run take care off something and forgot.

I guess the 1st sentence made sense, a sarcastic swipe at his claim and the irony of it.

Millions of lives* lost because* of progressives which just so happen to stand for the same thing as regressives do with conservativatism.

=

Millions of lives lost because of progressives which somehow also happen to stand for the same thing as regressive types do with their conservative ideology.

Still discombulated, but makes a little more sense now, haha

It sure wasn't the DNC. That is whom was terrorizing Blacks. Trying to hide the party behind labels will not work with me. The biggest enemy of Blacks has always been the DNC.

Pretty sure it was those whites who still want to bring back slavery to revive the moribund economy of the South and lynch a few along the way.

It looks like we have come a long way from those days as evidenced by a twice elected Black president.

Thank goodness for the Party of Lincoln, eh?

Hey, you didn't answer my question below about voter fraud.
Yes, some attempted lies do turn out to be based in truth after all.
Weird, I know.

I am absolutely thanking God for the party of Lincoln!! As for voter fraud - I am not sure as to what you are asking.

Google.

Oh, wait, they hate Trump too, so newspapers, no, that's not good either.
I'm sure Fox has a take on it.

Just because you make shit up, doesn't make it true. We all know the gerrymandering by the GOP that is going on. We all know about the fake election fraud and voter laws to combat it that is highly targeted against minorities. Take your fake news to Fox, where people actually drink the Kool-Aid.

Both parties have taken part in gerrymandering, so put a sock in it. Tell me about the election fraud - please. I am black and have never had an issue with voting and have been voting since the 1970s. But you know more about it than me. None of my family or black friends have ever had an issue with voter laws stopping them from voting. BTW, I don't have FOX - try again.

Both, but Republicans do it far more extensively. In fact, if it wasn't for Gerrymandering, The GOP would be just about gone.

Election fraud? Funny you should ask. Guess which State is now having investigations on the State and Federal level because of fraud? Hint: Rhymes with North Carolina.

Georgia was lovely too, wasn't it?

probably a brain washed NPC who did this

"Progressivism is the support for or advocacy of improvement of society by reform." That can mean many things.