I'm just.... asking questions.

I'm just.... asking questions. | DO LIBERALS REALLY BELIEVE ACTING HATEFULLY LOW CLASS... IS REALLLY GOING TO WIN PUBLIC OPINION AND SUPPORT? | image tagged in liberals,hate,low class | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
4,450 views, 77 upvotes, Made by CarrickMcHwain 1 month ago liberalshatelow class
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
8 ups, 3 replies
Jack Nicholson Crazy Hair | THEY AIN'T SANE | image tagged in jack nicholson crazy hair | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
That Would Be Great Meme | AS A LIBERAL PERSON, I THINK THAT'S A VERY DUMB WAY TO PROTEST. | image tagged in memes,that would be great | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
Hunger Games - Caesar Flickerman/Stanley Tucci "The fact is" | ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY ONLY US ALT REICHGTERS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO ACT DUMB IN PROTESTS? | image tagged in hunger games - caesar flickerman/stanley tucci the fact is | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
1 up
lol
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
Roll Safe Think About It Meme | IT’S NOT POLITICAL FOR THEM IT’S A CULT | image tagged in memes,roll safe think about it | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
4 ups
Hunger Games - Caesar Flickerman (S Tucci) Statue of Caesar | THAT THERE IS SOMEONE WHO KNOWS WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT! THE ONLY ONE WORTHY OF A CULT (OTHER THAN MYSELF) IS THE GOD EMPEROR    TRUMP! | image tagged in hunger games - caesar flickerman s tucci statue of caesar | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Futurama Fry Meme | JUST ANOTHER WAY TO STRENGTHEN THEIR BONDS | image tagged in memes,futurama fry | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
6 ups
reply
5 ups
Gosh, I love being me!
reply
9 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
That's not how real liberals talk. That's how SJWs talk! lol
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
3 ups
I'm being quite honest. I'm very far left and I don't talk like that. Only a hypocritical SJW would! XD
reply
7 ups
No Democrats don't think that, just some protesters. On the other hand the head of the Republican party - Trump, does think that. His base mistakes this for straight talk, or for not being politically correct.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
You don't say much, but if you understand what they're doing is wrong, then I don't care if you're left or right, I wouldn't mind having a conversation with you. Problem with a lot of these "liberals," which I don't know why you want to associate with, is that conversation with them is impossible.

Look at the other liberals commenting on here. They "still" do not get it. I'm not questioning the "morality" of these people's protest. I'm directly questioning the causality of it and effectiveness of it. Do these people not realize what they're doing is having an opposite effect? That was the point, which they're too triggered to realize.

Looking at their replies it is the typical:
- well right wingers do it too
- well you're low class!
- well blah blah blah.

But NOT one addresses themselves and realize what they're doing is wrong and it is not working out for them, except you. You seem to know what they're doing is wrong.
reply
3 ups
I see. And still, I'm far left, I'm quite anti-Trump, and I think protesting like that won't convince anyone. If they're ever going to convince anyone, they must act more professional and logical. They must be less vague and actually explain why Trump is a bad president. People protesting like that is going to make liberals look bad. We already have the overly politically correct (not to mention hypocritical) SJWs making liberals look bad as it is! They must give convincing arguments! Not weird, vague insults and giant Trump baby balloons.
reply
7 ups
reply
5 ups
i.imgflip.com/2e2dh0.jpg (click to show)
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
But look at those incredibly logical and fact based arguments they're making!
reply
5 ups
reply
[deleted]
5 ups
reply
7 ups, 2 replies
f**k you hypocrite right wing jackass facists...
reply
4 ups
lol
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
Politics is a circle not a line. No difference between far left and far right
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
No difference between the far left and the far right? As a far left person, I think you're full of shit. The far left and far right have opposite beliefs and values. The far right are cruel and bigoted. The far left stand for equality and freedom. I find the fact that you can't tell the difference pretty sad.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
The far left don't promote bigotry and mass genocide. The far right do, you moron.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Alright. I did over exaggerate there. Sorry about that. But please tell me how the far left and far right are the same. I really want to know what makes you think that.
reply
3 ups, 3 replies
Both trash people who have different views & are intolerant. They become a club and have fewer contacts and friendships outside of their views. The best examples are right wing Hitler and communist Stalin. Both abused their people, made s government cult and were especially brutal to opposition. They even hated each other although they could have been political cousins.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Oh. I understand. Let me explain something. Stalin was not liberal at all. He wasn't a real communist at all. It's a very far spread misconception. Stalin was a hypocrite and a fascist. In fact, there has been a long history of world leaders who claimed to be socialists and communists, but actually are fascists and autocrats. Real liberals stand against intolerance, autocracy, and fascism.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
But that's the point.

Marxist ideology may seem radically left, but those supposedly implementing it never are. Like any head of goverment or politician, such is just a means to rally the masses, blinding them with a doctrine they adhere to, telling them that even glaring misteps are mere bumps to be tweeked later, or just necessary sacrifices to steer society on the right course in the long term.

"Yeah, I tore up the lawn real bad, but wait till you see the new sod, it'll be lovely in a few weeks..."

Leaders meanwhile are about their own selfish needs, just like anyone. They veer towards what is familiar and in their own interest, utilizing their position and the mechanisms in place to create the world as they will, which curiously always jusat happens to be in their image, their beckoning smile a beaming light blessing the adulating minions,,,
2 ups
Yeah. I know. It is quite sad. That's the reason why I'm not a communist. It can never be done right. Believing that communism will be done right eventually is pretty much beating a dead horse at this point.
1 up
Pure communism requires full faith and selflessness by everyone to their true abilities. But in reality too many bulk it, too many become less productive, and too many rise to leadership to get perks no one else can have. So my point is still that there is no difference
reply
0 ups, 3 replies
Something tells me that you don't understand what being far-left means. No offense. But still.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
"Fascism is naturally a far-right belief. And fascism is a pretty evil system. And what do the far-left stand for? Socialism, communism, etc. And there's nothing really bad about the idea of those systems themselves. It's just that the leaders who claim to be socialist, communist, etc, are just posers who are actually far-right. So, in other words, no. Both sides are not the same. You're just confused."

But DrS is not. Communists have always been conservative. Just look at any of those countries from the very beginnings of implementation. They actively supressed liberty, individuality, and anything remotely progressive or radical. From Stalin to Castro to Pol Pot and the rest, that's the first thing they set about doing.

Both also went about invading other countries, expanding territory, all in the name of spreading their idealogy for the 'greater good'

And how is it that facism is bad and communism not? They're victims would disagree - if they could,,,
1 up
Listen. Communism was never done correctly. Ever. Communism is about everyone living equal in a classless society. All of those leaders however, were too greedy, selfish, and cruel to be real communists.
0 ups
Sorry. I just had to.
reply
1 up, 3 replies
1 up
Fascism is naturally a far-right belief. And fascism is a pretty evil system. And what do the far-left stand for? Socialism, communism, etc. And there's nothing really bad about the idea of those systems themselves. It's just that the leaders who claim to be socialist, communist, etc, are just posers who are actually far-right. So, in other words, no. Both sides are not the same. You're just confused.
0 ups
Since when was false equivalency a sufficient justification to dismiss both sides of an argument when the Republicans control both Houses of Congress and the Presidency despite the Mueller investigation yielding roughly twenty indictments and five former Trump staffers pleading guilty to federal charges? Oh, that's right, why let facts get in the way of an idiotic argument?
0 ups
Republicans do not control Congress. The “freedom caucus” of Libertarians who snuck into the GOP do not allow disbandment of liberal laws like Obamacare nor immigration reform, or further borrowing. So we really have 3 factions
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
"DJFox

Listen. Communism was never done correctly. Ever. Communism is about everyone living equal in a classless society. All of those leaders however, were too greedy, selfish, and cruel to be real communists.

"DJFox

JUST BECAUSE WORLD LEADERS SUCK AT IT DOESN'T MAKE COMMUNISM ITSELF A BAD THING.

Sorry. I just had to."

Communism was never done correctly because it can't be. Humans are a social species, and thus hierarchal, and thus class oriented. It's simply instinctive.
Even non-social species have hierarchies. This small bear just won't tread near that bigger one's territory. That bigger one goes where it wants. Then he gets older, feebler, gets ill, and then another bear attacks him and off to some far off place to eat worms instead of salmon he goes to wither and die.

"Communism is about everyone living equal in a classless society."

Without the incentive of reward or upward mobility, drive stifles. Production amongst workers is less productive. You're going to toil hard while a lazy slouch doesn't right next to you on the assembly line just to get treated the same at the end of a monotonous day?

The only way Marxism can work is as it has, in small scale communities like kibuttzes such as in Israel. They've even had them started by Marxist Jewish settlers in Argentina. Those communities are shrinking as newer generations go for higher educations and better jobs in cities. Co-op apartments started right here in the Bronx with Jewish people living communally, sharing responsibilities. Yes, idealistic with Marxism, they were dedicated. Later generations saw oppurtunities outside of their cluster of buildings, and now such groups are gone.

People can dedicate themselves on a small scale, but there's no compelling following generations to be so motivated.
They work from within. They cannot work when imposed from above, and certainly not on a massive scale.
1 up
I know that communism can never be done correctly no matter what you do. That's why I'm not a communist (I'm a democratic socialist, in case you were wondering). I'm just trying to say that the idea itself isn't evil. That's all.
reply
0 ups
"DrSarcasm

Pure communism requires full faith and selflessness by everyone to their true abilities. But in reality too many bulk it, too many become less productive, and too many rise to leadership to get perks no one else can have. So my point is still that there is no difference"

It can be said all political sytems end up the same sooner or later. Those in higher ranks seeking to climb ever higher while closing their ranks to others entering, sytems become rigid, and power protected. Reigns of goverment, economy, society in their ever increasing grip, and it becomes a fiefdom rigged solely for their own benefit. Crumbs get fewer, the masses get hungry, and it's revolution time again. And then the reset, starting the cycle again.

Communism is idealistic to a point past naive, relying on that selflessness, something people are incapable of. Life is, after all, by its very nature, selfish.

Socialism seems dandy save for the fact that it breeds an ever increasing sense of entitlement from ever spoiled and increasingly uninispired and thus unproductive masses with an ever declining ability to pay to sustain the system.

Our Capitalistic Republic ideals are also susceptiable to all the above, and aspects of such have steadily been encroaching since the get go. Even our checks and balances aren't immune from corruption. But a dependence on profitabilty, sired by innovation and the need for a consumer base willing to buy plus that same base willing to yell in the public sphere for what it wants keeps it flowing and folks productive. Values swing left and right and find common ground or keep each other in check and hopefully tomorrow we will all be ok.
So while it has its fault, it's the most sensible and fair-ish and more capable of righting itself from within.

Been feeling sick, I'm rambling like a pretentious idiot, not sure where I'm going, forgive for repeating myself or what you already have said.
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
No need to stoop to that, DrScarcasm didn't resort to name calling with you, even after you did.

Which is feedom, which is bigotry - all that is a matter of perspective,,,
Folks tend to think those not in agreement with them are in the wrong, as opposed to often just variations (oft relatively minute) in values.

And from the middle or from the outside, yes, it's the same Team A vs Team B yapping self righteous grandstanding...
reply
1 up
And from viewpoint of* the middle or from the outside, ...
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I'm still having trouble figuring out why people in the middle see the far left and the far right as the same. Well, what I think is the reason why is the bad image liberals have been given in the recent years. Maybe when people in the middle think of liberals, they think of SJWs and feminazis. Those kind of people are not real liberals, but many mistaken them to be what people on the far left are like. So, in other words, the people in the middle are simply confused. They see liberals as overly politically correct idiots who think only woman and minority groups deserve rights and heterosexual white men don't. I dunno. That's just my theory. I really hate SJWs and feminazis. Not only that they are hypocritical and obnoxious, but they give all liberals a nasty image. So, you do you think? Does my theory seem true?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Those may seem like extreme fringes, but they're nothing new. They're what drives any movement. You want 60, you ask for 75, hoping they'll compromise and give you at least 55. Women were burning bras back in the 60s and 70s. Marches weren't about cheery smiles, they were about near revolution strength anger. It was even reflected in Sci Fi: scenarios of post-Apocalyptic men hating Amazon civilizations in outer space was all the, um, rage. Same with anti war, civil rights, class warfare, etc, - as seen in Planet of the Apes and all in its wake...

Rads on the two fake sides yap for whatever, get some cute speeches promising nothing and a cookie to munch on on the way home.
In the meantime, their stalwart representatives diligently work for the good of crony interests. A minute fraction of their constituencies may make occasional phone calls, but business backers sign checks.

Stances are hypocritical too. Abortion bad, but war and capital punishment good. War and executions bad, but let's get rid of 'mistakes' made by those who don't know how to take ownership of their loins prior, as long as they're not animals on a farms that should instead be turned into petting zoos. That neither 'side' stops to notice the inconsistencies in their beliefs shows how little thought they put into their positions, mindless to their own hypocrisy.

But that's not what matters. What matters is as abortion is on the verge of being illegalized never after half a century and the poor will be rescued and a way will be found to return manufacturing to our shores by somehow eventually counteracting gov't created incentives to leave, we have two factions duking it out over the keyboard, threatening civil war with paintball guns on the nearest Walmart parking lot on Black Thursday.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
I'm sorry, but I am having trouble understanding what you're trying to tell me.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Political parties have become religions for supposed polar opposite sides who blind themselves to their own inconsistencies.
Both sides are not that disimilar, and in the end have mostly the same wants.

It's basic divide and conquer: getting them to hiss at each other while their rich reps get rich by scrwing them with no threats from below.
1 up
Yeah. I think I see what you're telling me now. Democrats and Republicans, despite having different values here and there, are becoming quite similar now. I still think that my theory might be correct. Some people tend to not like liberals because of the far spread misconceptions.
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Sibling marriages
reply
2 ups
HAA! Sibling marriages is a great way of putting it!
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
It's called "diplomacy" :)
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Did you just "Obama did it too so it's not bad" me?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Protocol exists everywhere, it's not just a royalty thing. The president in my country for example has the exact same role as the queen in the UK, he still follows procedures and protocols. The point is to avoid insulting foreign dignitaries . I'd be mad too if any foreigner was strolling carelessly in front of my president during a military inspection.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
I didn’t see the video to put it in context but I think that tradition died before the queen did
reply
0 ups
I give up
reply
8 ups, 2 replies
I thought you guys liked hatefully low class behavior. I mean if it worked for Trump...
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
lol
reply
1 up
haha!
reply
0 ups
Haha. True.
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
Oh, that's right, gotta love supporters of the "All Lives Matter" movement advocate for forcible separation of asylum-seeking families or their justification of Trump's pardoning of Joe Arpaio despite his open contempt of court not to enforce unconstitutional police practices.

Remind me again when the "Remember the 'Bowling Green Massacre'" vigil is somewhere in Pro-Conservative conspiracy land.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Again, I am not stating that we should do away with weaponry, but why is it that we have little-to-no stipulations or restrictions for otherwise mentally ill deemed incapable of managing their affairs allowed to own and operate weaponry when Republican leadership state that it is a mental health issue?

Likewise, we require testing and practical demonstrations to legally operate motor vehicles, which require annual evaluations for monitoring whether or not they are safe to operate on our roadways, but we aren't capable of doing the same for weapons.

Why?
reply
1 up
I agree.

My memeing character is satire.
reply
7 ups, 4 replies
My meme is posted ironically.
I believe they actually do.
Furthermore, they are pushing pedophilia now, which is very sad and evil.
I honestly dont know how the left will ever recover.
They are openly anti American, pro open border and socialist. Communist pedos. Smh
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
They are eating themselves even bernie sanders is not far left enough for them
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
We are about to have a Marxist pm Jeremy corybn because our "conservatives" are raising taxes and government spending and they screwed us over with brexit
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
With the Tories privatizing everything - a giveaway to cronies really - cutting off services especially to the disabled and poor and demonizing them (just like here) did they forgot that if they antagonize enough of the masses, the masses will eventually bite back? Then the pendulem swings too far the other way.

They even wanted to sell the (British) Royal Mint, which has been in operation 800 yrs or some crap. That's a not a business, that's history and heritage and pride and a gov't function for all citizens.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
The Conservatives left wing authoritarians 2 things I don't like but who else do you have labour my mp stood in Parliament and said I'm on my period like ffs that's disgusting conservatives just lefties the greens are just a puppet for the snp and the snp are just socialist who call themselves nationalist they are globalists and europhiles ukip are the only option
reply
1 up
I don't know the finer details, so I quickly looked up the SNP and UKIP.

From Scots I've encountered before, especially round the referendum, seems independence is something most want. I'm all for that, but then they still wanted to be in the EU. So out UK, in with EU, how can the EU be better, other than pride which would get drowned out with open borders?

UKIP seems cool, but far right and nationalist movements tend to tread into scary territory all too quickly. Brexit seemed cool to me, and I know plenty for it, but with the spectre of Russian meddling, now I don't know. I had been following Britain First on Facebook, but I hardly go on FB anymore. Most Brits I know don't like them. Something has to be done though, because the UK is giving itself away to invaders. Stuff I've heard is so unbelievable I've had to read it from various sources and even had Brits confirm it. It's shocking.
(I used to be on a site with a forum that was mostly Brits, so gotten to know some)
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Everytime I look still, it cracks me up.
reply
0 ups
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
9 ups
The day Roy Moore lost that senate election was a wonderful day in America
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
You sir, don't know anything about liberals, socialism, or communism, you brainwashed conservative twat.
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
And a rally is formed
reply
1 up
reply
3 ups
With themselves... yes
With others... no
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
CarrickMcHwain, are you a liberal? This is the first comment I see on your account....
reply
6 ups, 1 reply
reply
1 up, 1 reply
I couldn't decide whether he was just deliberately trolling me or he really is that stupid. I think I'm quite nice by giving him the benefit of the doubt that nobody is that stupid. It's not his first time, he done it a few times. What did he say there? "Oh I don't know if Egypt was part of the Roman Empire... I'll just assume it is."

It's not whether one knows it as historical fact or not, but if you're in a debate over something, isn't it common sense to "research" the facts? I mean, if he claims he doesn't know whether Egypt was part of the Roman Empire, then... research it. Instead he has the audacity to stipulate it as false, not even worth researching without seeing how hypocritical he made himself b/c he started commenting by attacking a false premise (which was a liberal premise to begin with!) and ending up revealing he never had the intention of acknowledging facts or history.

And if someone like that is a liberal, do you agree with that? You want to be associated with people that ... either stupid they don't know how stupid they are or they are deliberately arguing for the sake of argument?

Just like the poster above who is going to compare me, with a comment on a meme website calling out a stupid liberal troll ... to publicly acting like a low class in global media around the world against a president of a nation?

Again, is that poster above really that stupid? Or just arguing for the sake of arguing? And cause and effect, what has he accomplished with his idiocy? He convinced me, someone who don't give a crap about politics, to actually vote.... against him. NICE!
reply
2 ups
"It's not whether one knows it as historical fact or not, but if you're in a debate over something, isn't it common sense to "research" the facts?"

Not if the fact in question (Egypt being a part of the Roman Empire) is completely unrelated to the point I was making about the flight to Egypt being mythology, not history.

It's like if someone said "Neil Armstrong was a great astronaut, his home state of Indiana must be really proud!" Well, Neil Armstrong was born in Ohio, not Indiana, but that's true yet irrelevant when the actual point is that he was a great astronaut.

"I mean, if he claims he doesn't know whether Egypt was part of the Roman Empire, then... research it. Instead he has the audacity to stipulate it as false..."

Go back and reread the comment, you liar. I stipulated it as *true*.

"...without seeing how hypocritical he made himself..."

This is coming from the guy who made a meme accusing liberals of being hateful and low-class, when your own meme is filled with comments by you where you just insult and deride and complain about people.
reply
1 up, 3 replies
Leave it to a liberal to once again quote things out of place and comparing apples to oranges. This is why you guys lost. You are either deliberately obtuse or your IQ just too low to see your own stupidity.

As you "clearly" claimed, it is the 1st comment you see, ergo you just completely omitted over a "year" or more worth of conversations I had with that racist troll and draw a conclusion based on a shallow observation.

Are you going to claim that this UK liberal low class protest is the "1st" and "only" kind your rabid hateful protest liberals have done say since 2016? Oh let's all just forget UC Berkeley burning itself down to silent free speech or the other countless riots such as the March on Washington where liberals burned the limo of an Arab limo driver?

But thanks for post that screenshot, so others can reference it and see how low class liberal trolls are. That troll actually arguing over historical fact it was laughable.

As I've said, I'm actually apolitical. But hell I'm giving all my votes to the GOP just to piss off you low class taco wrapping liberals.

The IRONY of course, is that you're still too stupid to see it. That it is because you act the way you do, you're not drawing support for, you're actually driving people to go against you. I never voted GOP until 2016. And I believe I will keep voting for them for years to come, not actually because I give a damn about their politics, but just to oppose you.

Thanks for proving my point.
reply
4 ups
"The IRONY of course, is that you're still too stupid to see it. That it is because you act the way you do, you're not drawing support for, you're actually driving people to go against you. I never voted GOP until 2016. And I believe I will keep voting for them for years to come, not actually because I give a damn about their politics, but just to oppose you."

This is exactly the problem with modern day politics. Everyone who participates imagines that they are in some sort of war with their political opponents, and not because of what their actual beliefs are.

"Thanks for proving my point."

This, not surprisingly, I get often. Over the past few years I've been here, the majority of users have replied to me with "Thanks for proving my point" with no context whatsoever. As a result, I'm not too surprised I got this from you.
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
"Leave it to a liberal to once again quote things out of place and comparing apples to oranges. This is why you guys lost. You are either deliberately obtuse or your IQ just too low to see your own stupidity."

I guess comparing name-callers to name-callers is comparing apples to oranges.

"As you "clearly" claimed, it is the 1st comment you see, ergo you just completely omitted over a "year" or more worth of conversations I had with that racist troll and draw a conclusion based on a shallow observation."

I've known Octavia_Melody for well over 2 years, and I can tell you that he is not a racist who hates white people/Europeans. I thought only liberals called people racist.

"Are you going to claim that this UK liberal low class protest is the "1st" and "only" kind your rabid hateful protest liberals have done say since 2016? Oh let's all just forget UC Berkeley burning itself down to silent free speech or the other countless riots such as the March on Washington where liberals burned the limo of an Arab limo driver?"

For starters, I didn't bring up anything about the Washington March, nor did I bring up Berkeley. Berkeley had a lot of violence, whereas this UK protest merely had a balloon and ad hominem fallacies on signs. Secondly, the fact you'd think that I'd say this protest was good is a clear sign of black/white thinking: because I disagree with you or call you out for your mistakes, I am obviously some kind of liberal retard. Personally, I think of myself as more of a moderate: I can hold a polite conversation as long as the person I'm debating is respectful as well.

"But thanks for post that screenshot, so others can reference it and see how low class liberal trolls are. That troll actually arguing over historical fact it was laughable. As I've said, I'm actually apolitical. But hell I'm giving all my votes to the GOP just to piss off you low class taco wrapping liberals."

More of a moderate left troll, and then you bragged to a commenter about how you're going to vote against me. If that's not proof against your credibility, then I'm not sure what is.
reply
3 ups
But I disagreed with someone who has a vaguely Scottish-sounding username. Clearly I am a rabid anti-white racist!!
reply
1 up
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
I would comment, but you'd just accuse me of hating Scottish people XD
reply
5 ups
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
But you just commented. Or you're too stupid to see that? LOL

I do apologize. Now I'm changing my mind. Maybe you're not deliberately trolling. Maybe you really are just that stupid.
reply
3 ups
Unable to comprehend irony?
reply
3 ups
If the Liberals are being hatefully low class than clearly Conservatives are vile, vulgar, and classless.
reply
5 ups
reply
2 ups, 2 replies
reply
2 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
They do it for purpose no one is paid, unlike the attendees at trumps early rallies, I know because I went with someone being paid to go, along with a few hundred others.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
:)
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
How much were the anti obama russian birther protesters paid? huh?
reply
2 ups
reply
2 ups
reply
1 up, 1 reply
reply
2 ups
Even though I'm a liberal person who's very anti-Trump, I think that's just a plain dumb way to protest. Weird, vague insults and Trump-baby balloons won't convince anyone. Those protesters are making fools of themselves.
reply
1 up
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
They think insults and vulgarity are clever, so yes, they think this will convince people. People who are easily swayed think tactics that sway them will also sway others.
reply
6 ups
reply
2 ups
You pass (if you are Russian) the test, along with the others here, congrats. If you are an American, you right wing idiots fail miserably - https://reason.com/archives/2018/02/26/are-you-a-russian-troll
Flip Settings

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
EXTRA IMAGES ADDED: 1
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
DO LIBERALS REALLY BELIEVE ACTING HATEFULLY LOW CLASS... IS REALLLY GOING TO WIN PUBLIC OPINION AND SUPPORT?
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback