National School Walkout Day vs. Personal Responsibility

Why would you assume the republican was hateful? This. to me is where the whole thing is falling apart.

Do tell.

You are brainwashed shit. Emotionally manipulated and motivated shit.

Mature. Extending civil discourse. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem

In my town, it's spring break this week. lol!

Hold the protests on a Saturday. See what kind of showing you get then.

Unless they're paid by Soros, which I believe they are.

I don't know. Cutting in on that video game time can get expensive, even for that guy.

I'm willing to bet they are not high school students, either...they look college-aged and brainwashed by Bolshevik communist professors.

Too bad for those kids. I'm sure they feel disenfranchised now.
I heard a news story of a principle from a private school who made an announcement right after the Parkland shooting when the Parkland students were on TV saying there would be a walkout. He said that if his students did walk out they would get suspended. Turns out his school is out for Spring Break this week too, but people are calling him all kinds of names like "oppressor" and saying he "tried to infringe on the students rights."

When I was growing up students didn't have all these so-called rights. We went to school and if we messed around, we got in trouble. This walk out isn't going to do anything. They think they're making change, but they're just looking like a bunch of idiots who's opinions mean something.

I think the school you're talking about is here in Texas. But the schools in my town wouldn't be doing it either and the kids don't really give a shit.

The Parkland students who have been all over TV calling for gun control and all the students doing the walkout don't understand that they are just being used as mouth pieces by leftists to push their agenda. Most of them will be voting age soon too.

Democrats haven't been playing a role, its the facts that 17 classmates were murdered and they feared for their lives is why they want gun control

The leftist media (I never said Democrats, there is a difference, if you want to know what that is look up Ben Shapiro and his explanation) want to call for out right gun bans but they know there would be major blow-back. So they allow these teenagers to come on live television and say whatever they want. These young people may genuinely have these opinions but they are being used to push an agenda.

I used to be die hard against abortion. And then someone brought up the rape argument to me.
I was younger then and honestly never thought rape was the reason for some abortions. Of course I am not going to tell a lady who was raped that she has to give birth to the rape baby. So I am not against abortion as much as I once was. But only with rape and similar reasons. If the woman just doesn't want the responsibility after fooling around, then I am against abortion.
Perhaps that is why guys must pay child support in cases like that where there is no marriage and two people had a child. That way it would encourage the woman to have the child instead of aborting it.....

Anyways I firmly believe that the rapist should be killed. He raped someone, he forced a horrible decision on her regarding the unborn child, and he probably traumatized her for life. He should be put down like the animal he is so he will not ruin another life.

And that is usually where most people disagree with me. I am curious, what do you think in regards to the rapist?

*BTW This picture is Ivar from Vikings TV series. If you haven't seen it you should, it is quite good. At this point though Ragnar is dead and Ivar is my favorite character!

If the media covered it in every news cycle on nearly every major network, yes I would, and so would all the liberals as they rightly should. But that doesn't happen. When young people or minorities espouse conservative viewpoints they may be mentioned on FAUX news which is, in my opinion, controlled opposition.

The adult politicians and news media are vicariously pushing their narrative and agenda through those young people.

I like how he uses the words "leftist" and "media" for every argument he makes.

Would you rather he called them Bolsheviks 2.0? Because that is what they really are.

How is that?

I just like how he blames everything on "leftist media".

Eliminating Gun-Free Zones is pro-life! The agenda being pushed is PRO-DEATH and the scumbag media is using confused, frightened children to push it!
If everyone was armed, psychos wouldn't try anything. It's called mutually assured destruction.

I used to think that the liberals on Imgflip were our biggest fun block. now that things have heated up, I'm actually noticing a more rabid response from conservatives.

These are good counter-points, by the way.

What is this, doublespeak a la 1984?

M.A.D is used to refer to either drastic climate change or a nuclear war, the two most well-publicized things that could ruin humanity by our own hand.

Let's assure everyone's destruction and clear out this shithole!

The best type of gun control is the control an armed citizen has over the gun in their hand to defend against an enemy. A gun-free zone is telling psychos that there are easy targets inside and no one is going to fire back.

It's much better to fight back than be a sitting duck waiting to be hunted down by an armed psycho.

... out of their cold dead hands

- to partyphrase the Hest!

Those children would still be alive if the teachers were armed. Sitting in a closet hoping you won't be found by a psycho won't save anyone's life.

How about they just stay in school and become smart and do good for society?

lol
1jgff0.gif (click to show)

Those stupid kids just go there to yell and try to get screwed.

And they have the audacity to complain when they get shot at, damn kids!

I'd bet less than 5% of them have ever even heard a gunshot.

And even less died from one. Well we know how to change that!

Yup. Armed security, just like real government buildings.

Like the one who ran out and kept the rear door locked in Fla?
The hell with the kid!

No, lots of um with real guns. Gunfights are won with numbers and firepower. Shooters are deterred by fear of death before they can accomplish what they set out to do (kill lots of people). One rent a cop meets neither of those criteria.

Hey, only been almost 2.5 centuries. The 2nd Amendment will stop crime soon, I can feel it!

So when are we gonna form this volunteer militia to guard the schools?

A world without crime doesn't exist. The 2nd amendment isn't to stop crime, it's to keep our government in check. The government cannot dominate its people if they have weapons to resist with. Assault rifles are the US citizens greatest power over our government because they can pierce military body armor. Handguns cannot.

No volunteers in the schools. They need to be paid professionals. Rather than arm teachers, our schools should have armed security that get paid extra if they teach classes and rotate from teaching to patrolling with other armed security.

THAT'S the 2nd Amendment. Derp much?

Lying about those very words themselves doesn't help prove your case.

You're trying to deal with people who, yes, as you say, ARE more educated than you, ARE more informed than you, and ARE more intelligent than you.
Try, at least, to act the part.

Thanks for playing.

I didn't say any of that and I didn't lie. I guess that makes you the liar, don't it?

The founding fathers did put the second amendment in as a way to keep the government they were creating in check. They had a little thing called the American Revolution in which their government exploited them so they fought back. The 2nd states that a militia and the right to bear arms "is necessary for a free state". In other words, if the citizens can't kick their governments ass if it needs it then they aren't really free.

AKA, you can shut up now.

Liar.

K ignore facts, put words in my mouth, bring up images of racism and stereotypes, and call me a liar.

My favorite part is when you quoted the 2nd word for word like it was helping your argument that the governments military is the same as a militia. Quote it all you want but if you don't know what the words mean you're not really reading it.

What you need is a dictionary. Try looking up "military" and "militia".

The 2nd Amendment was to provide said goverment with a well regulated militia, as also referred to in the preamble to the Consitution, you know, for the common defense.

Feel free to join and soldier.

The military is the tool of the government.

A militia is formed and "owned" by citizens.

The 2nd was put in place so the citizens of our country could defend themselves from foreign threats and domestic ones, including our own government and military.

The 2nd DOES NOT say that the militia it's referring to belongs to the government. The 2nd DOES say that a militia and the right to keep weapons is a right necessary to keep a free state.

If the citizens can't protect themselves from their own government then they cannot be free because the government will oppress them. Ex. The American Revolution and the events leading up to it.

You should try reading it sometime. National Guard, anyone?

To think that they created a law so that renegade illiterate hicks that can't understand said law can go shoot things up is pretty silly - as witnessed in places from Waco to Deserat to the Confederacy. AKA no KKK.

Amendment to the United States Constitution:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"

Nice try, not a militia

Crime watch daily, binge watch that and you'll see how humans with guns really tend to operate

kids*

^ MSM lies!