But why should we suffer consequences that are proportional to the bad things we do? What necessitates this? You state that "what you put out is what you get back, or that's how it's supposed to work." Who says that's the way it's supposed to work? Where did you get that information? Should the shooter have his own life disregarded because he disregarded human life? Does this make us no better than he is? Are there actions that would qualify someone as a "bad person" other than disregard of human life? Is it the person in that case who is bad, or is it the actions that person takes? I do not think we punish people, but we punish their actions: not because of who they are, but because of what they do. You appear to not believe in God, but you also bring up the well worn canard of why God "allows bad things to happen to good people." Someone above mentioned free will. Free will is not complete control over every aspect of your life. It does not mean that if you choose good, only good things will ever happen to you. However, it does give us a specific choice: good or evil. This choice only applies to our own actions, and not to the actions of others. If others choose evil, we cannot stop them from doing so. Your argument is that God should stop these things from happening, and that because He sometimes doesn't, He either doesn't exist, or doesn't care about human life. This is to judge God's will according to human standards. I must also ask you how you know that God does not exist because the shooter was not dead or in jail "before he fired a single bullet."