Creepy Condescending Wonka

Creepy Condescending Wonka Meme | SO IF GUNS ARE THE PROBLEM IN CRIME, THEN WHY ARE NOT PENCILS RESPONSIBLE FOR BAD GRADES!? | image tagged in memes,creepy condescending wonka | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
9,578 views, 156 upvotes, Made by TheGandolf1 9 months ago memescreepy condescending wonka
Creepy Condescending Wonka memeRe-caption this meme
Add Meme
Post Comment
reply
[deleted]
13 ups, 1 reply
i blame spoons for making rosie odonell fat
reply
11 ups, 2 replies
BUT GUNS KILL THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS AND OBESITY KILLS ACTUALLY OKAY THAT IS A PRETTY GOOD ANALOGY | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
[deleted]
6 ups, 1 reply
Captain Picard Facepalm Meme | Do we blame her parents for making her butt ugly? | image tagged in memes,captain picard facepalm | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Picard Wtf Meme | WE BLAME TOO MUCH BEER AND OFF SWITCHES ON LAMPS | image tagged in memes,picard wtf | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
[deleted]
2 ups
Hahaha. You make me laugh.
reply
3 ups
YOU  WANT  ME  TO  GO  PICK  UP  SOME  PENCILS ?  THAT  WOULD  BE    AAAWWSSSOOOMME ! | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
10 ups, 1 reply
THEY SHOULD ALL UPGRADE TO PENS NO MORE PENCILS | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
reply
[deleted]
10 ups, 2 replies
they don't even teach handwriting (cursive)
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
8 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
No, that's not what I said at all.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
But in a sense, you did.
reply
[deleted]
4 ups, 1 reply
No, in no sense did I. I spoke of pencils and the teaching of cursive in the public schools. There was no metaphor, stated or implied. It was a completely off topic comment.
reply
1 up, 2 replies
Follow the line of logic you set by your statement:

No pencils = no pencil writing
>
No guns = no guns firing

No metaphor required. Your line of reasoning stands as is.
reply
[deleted]
3 ups, 1 reply
That is what you say. I did not say that. And there is no line of reasoning. I was complaining about the state of schools. As I said before and please do me the courtesy of actually reading it, it was an off topic comment. Anything else ascribed to it is your comment and your comment alone.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
That is what I say? So that explains why I said it then, eh?
Neverteless, the logic is sound.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
If we ban pencils, it would take a VERY long time to get them all out of circulation. If we ban guns, it would take a VERY long time to get them out of circulation. Why? What happened when we banned weed, heroine, ect?
0 ups
No, it wouldn't. It would take weeks at most.

What happened when we banned Cuban cigars?
Heroine is the biggest crop grown in Afganistan, and despite a decade and a half there, our military has looked the other way, ever wonder why?
reply
[deleted]
3 ups
Pizza's here. have a good night
reply
7 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups, 1 reply
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
4 ups, 2 replies
reply
5 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
That is excellent. You made it or found it?
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Thanks...I made it...here's the template if you want it
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
Aww, thanks, I appreciate it. It's a good one.
reply
[deleted]
2 ups, 1 reply
reply
3 ups
reply
6 ups
reply
4 ups, 6 replies
reply
2 ups
Do you know the difference between kill and murder?
reply
2 ups, 1 reply
My friend, you are very wrong.
reply
2 ups
If you spent money on a gun that ain't, you should get a refund, 'cause someone ripped you off.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
A knife is designed to kill. Now one is trying to ban them.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
depends on the knife doesn't it? Where I live (France) you are not allowed to carry a military grade knife on the street just like a gun...
reply
0 ups
“Military grade” is BS. Anything could be construed as being “Military grade”, depending on whether or not someone benefits from so doing.

Just like “surgical steel” is actually crap recycled soft stainless steel.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Are you denying the guy's point that people, not guns, kill people?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
It's incomplete isn't it? Of course people kill people, but its so much easier with a weapon. So why allow killing weapons available, and why allow people to carry them?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
People shouldn't be allowed to own knives, or axes, or hammers, or chainsaws, or vehicles, or other things that can be used to kill people?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
OK anything can be used to hurt or kill people including my hands and no I'm not suggesting to ban hands... If you're looking for a simple rule which will eradicate crime, it doesn't exist. Yet saying that the rule is imperfect doesn't mean you shoudn't rule. Otherwise, the fact that crime exist would mean that laws are useless...
So you have to look for imperfect categories in order to be able to reduce crime as much as you can... I haven't seen any mass killing with chainsaws lately... It's just so easy to kill someone with a gun (yeah it's their main purpose!)...and it's so easy to buy a gun in the US...
I really have trouble understanding what there is to defend apart from the profit of gun corporations who want you to buy guns...
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
It's also more difficult for a person to kill/stop a criminal with a chainsaw.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
true. That's why you allow some entrusted people (police, army...) to have guns. Many killer thing they are doing good in their own mind...
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
So I, average person with gun licence, should not be allowed to own a gun because I might be a killer, but random military private, a person who may have been randomly drafted and may even be a killer, is trusted for some reason?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
well maybe a thourough background check for both, every other year, might be a good idea
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
It seems like it could probably work, but where are you going to get enough people to do thorough background checks on all military personnel and gun owners?
0 ups
Well, that's what other countries with gun regulations do so the mighty USA should be able to pull it off. Plus I guess (hope) they already do it for the military/police, the political risk of terrorist infiltration is to damn high!
reply
1 up
actually, if it broke during a test and YOU COULD NOT get another, if test was unfinished IT WOULD HAVE IN FACT been the cause of the bad grade!
reply
0 ups
A pencil can cause bad grades, though, and good grades. Just like guns can both kill and save lives.
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
reply
5 ups, 2 replies
The outside world isn't as intelligent as opponents to the 2nd Amendment want you to think.
reply
3 ups, 2 replies
And if you eliminate guns from the equation then all you have is a bunch of mentally deranged people running around with forks in their hands. Ehich is a lot easier to control and contain than a gun.
reply
2 ups
How about knifes? Or are? Or run over with vehicle... those can kill as well.
reply
2 ups
If you combine anything with the wrong people it can become bad. A cargo truck is useful to move big objects. But in the wrong hands it can be a lethal weapon. Like we saw in Nice, France. An attack that killed 86 and injured 458 people. ...... I still say people is the problem :)

In any case, what do you propose to reduce crimes with guns?

I have a hard time believing they truly have mental problems. They seem more like a punk-ass coward looking for an excuse to harm others. Is it even possible to function if one has a mental condition? I mean these "mass shooters" usually drive to their targeted location. And this last punk was even driving away after his slaughter! I am a bit amazed at how these individuals can drive to a place knowing what they are about to do? How do they control themselves? I have got into fights before and I always would get jittery and nervous like (shaky) in anticipation as to what may happen next. And that is just with the thought of punching someone! I can not grasp how these cowards keep themselves under control as they go about their slaughter. It would be a little different if one was raiding a terrorist hole, but innocent people, women and children! I don't understand how they even function well enough to drive or walk or stand. Do they take drugs that enables them to function properly during their rampage? Perhaps I don't understand mental problems. But they seem to do other things as good as a trained operative.(Sorry for getting off subject and for the lengthy rant. This is just some questions I have after every mass shooting/attack.)
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
OK I get your logic. So if we kill all Americans then no more mass shootings in the US! Simple!
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
I have had people get entirely different messages out of what I said before. And you are one of the worst. Did you hit every branch when you fell out of the stupid tree! Or is liberal schools teaching that every American with a gun is a bad person and a problem?! You do realize we was talking about mass shooters right? People like Adam Lanza and Dylan Storm Roof. Those individuals are the problem. Not Americans as a whole. Not every American is a psycho waiting to go on killing spree.

That might be YOUR logic. But it is not mine.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Oh look, another mass shooting in California with kids getting shot.

Better start sending thoughts and prayers, because you're never going to remove guns from society, because everyone needs an assault rifle but they don't need their kids growing up
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
Fortunately in this most recent shooting you are mentioning the children did survive. Or the article I read said four was killed but no children was killed.

Tell me, do you honestly believe that banning guns would solve anything? There are how many legal gun owners out there? Millions? If we was the problem you would know it. The only ones who would be affected in a gun ban is the law abiding citizen.

Why do people like you find it so damn difficult to blame the actual problem. Taking away the Constitutional Right to keep and bear arms will not solve this problem. I could blame this problem on lack of morals and discipline! I could also blame the media for glorifying these bastards which only inspires more sick cowards to follow in their paths! They will want to be like that guy on TV and go down as a bad ass, feared by all, become a legend. If little was said about those shooters. If we had Capital Punishment. Then we might thwart some of these shootings. Think about it. The next mass shooter that gets taken into custody, like the Aurora shooter. He gets a very swift, very public, and very painful execution. Let the world see how he shits himself and bawls his eyes out as he is executed and that will do more to thwart these cowardly punks than banning guns could ever do.

Do I need to list why these guys are cowards? Ok here it goes:
1. They bring guns to kill unarmed people.
2. They shoot women.
3. They shoot children.
4. Did I mention these people are unarmed? He chooses these gun free zones because he wants no resistance!
5. He wears tactical vests because he wants to survive.
6. They try to surrender to Police.
7. They flee when being shot at.
8. How much more proof do you need???
These guys are punk ass cowards! No mental problems. Just cowards filled with hate looking for an excuse to harm others!
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Gun control is over in the US, it is not even a question now. It has been decided that after Sandy Hook dead kids is an acceptable price to pay on a regular basis for Americans to own assault rifles and semi automatics. Each time more dead kids appear on the news the rest of the world will watch and again ask why Americans are ok with that. If even dead kids wasn't enough, one man shooting 500 people in Las Vegas confirmed what the rest of the developed world now knows, the gun industry making money is more important than the lives of American citizens.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
I realize you hate it that law abiding citizens can own guns. But you are ignoring so many other factors. This isn't a black and white issue like liberals portray it to be. There are many, many other factors involved.

1. For starters all of these mass shootings happened in a gun free zone. I don't need to explain why the shooter chose a gun free zone.

2. Gun control doesn't have to be a "ban everything" issue. All it has to do is keep guns out of the wrong hands. The guy in Texas might could have been stopped if someone did their job properly.

3. Why do these individuals go on a killing spree? What makes them decide to shoot a bunch of unarmed innocent people? These are questions that can help to keep guns out of the wrong hands to begin with. I can think of many reasons. I already listed some in the above comments about the media and lack of capital punishment. Another one might be violent video games. I know someone who blames gun violence on violent video games. Are you familiar with the Grand Theft Auto games? I saw a friend play GTA San Andreas and you basically play a criminal who runs around killing anyone you want. Police, civilians walking the streets, anyone. They can be shot, run over, and killed in several different ways. One could argue that such games normalize this killing behavior.

4. The terrorist in Nice, France killed roughly the same amount of people by driving a truck into crowds. Are we to ban heavy duty trucks too?

5. Did you like it when teachers punished the whole class for the actions of one or two? That is what banning guns will be like but on a much larger scale.

6. I know people who's gun saved them from wild animal attacks. And I know someone who carries a gun because her ex tried to kill her once. He is still loose and may try again. And she is an elderly lady.

7. Certain drugs are banned. Yet people obtains them anyway. Smuggling illegal products is very profitable. There are still drugs on the streets and it is still a very big problem. Criminals break the law. It's what they do. Banning guns will just disarm the law abiding citizens. Not the criminals. And regarding the individual about to go on a killing spree. We better be learning how to identify them before it happens. After nearly every mass shooting there is red flags. We need to learn to identify those red flags more better and act on them if we want to prevent more deaths.

I like this discussion with you.
reply
1 up, 2 replies
I don't hate it, I don't see the point of it. If someone wants to go to a shooting range for fun, then why not, but guns in everyday life is a recipe for disaster.

1. There are no internal borders in the US, so movement with weapons is easy
2. America has consistently failed at this and it's getting worse. Columbine despite being not that long ago is not even in the top 10 of worst mass shootings of all time.
3. The video game theory has been debunked a long time ago. I play violent games including San Andreas in the past but it doesn't make me want to kill people in real life, the same as Tom and Jerry didn't make me want to hit people over the head with a shovel. Why people do this is irrelevant, stopping them turning it into mass murder is the issue.
4. These incidents are rare, mass shootings occur every day in America
5. I don't remember being at school and getting punished for another kid killing someone!
6. I'm ok for guns for hunting, but who many Americans go hunting? 1%? Then again you need a hunting rifle, not an assault rifle. If you need auto or semi automatic weapons then you are a pretty sh** hunter....
7. Drugs tend to affect just the individual and don't kill others. It's an individuals problem and if they want to kill themselves then I am ok with that. Guns are not a chemical or physical addiction, no one will go to the black market to get their next fix.

Even if America banned all guns, which will not happen, it would take at least a generation to get them all out of circulation. Yes some would still exist but its an obvious arrest of a criminal if they go to someone's house and find a gun.
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
With all the tyrannical governments in the past. With all the violent gangs that turned into bigger gangs that turned into murderous leaders of a country. With all the evil people in the world you don't see the point in the Second Amendment.

1. Yes you are right. And movement to Mexico is pretty easy too. That is how a lot of illegal drugs slip in.
2. Which is why we better learn to figure out who these killers are before they become killers.
3. And holding a semi automatic handgun doesn't make me want to go out and kill a bunch of people. I could point out that the question of gun control has been debunked time and time again. Yet still it gets mentioned as the only way to stop gun violence.
4. Homicides, especially in large cities, may occur every day. But mass shootings do not occur everyday. They happen more often than they should but it is not everyday. Most of the homicides are done with non registered guns. Those guns were not bought legally.
5. I apologize for not clarifying it. I meant when one or two students broke the rules somehow. For example talking during class and then the teacher keeps the entire class back from recess. I didn't mean a student killing another. I was just trying to make a point about punishing everyone for the actions of a few.
6. No you don't hunt with semi autos. Those guns are made for self defense. And in the event a Red Dawn happened, the military could focus on offensive strategies because cities/towns could defend themselves. Did you know that in WW2 when the Japs was discussing the invasion of America one of them said they would be met with a gun behind every blade of grass if they invaded us.
Where do you live if you think only 1% goes hunting? I live in Kentucky and darn near everyone I know goes hunting. There is a lot of women hunters and gun owners too. When I took my Concealed Carry Deadly Weapons Class the ladies outnumbered the guys 5 to 4.
7. A yoyo high on drugs could be dangerous to others. But I was just trying to make a point banning won't work.

The problem with banning guns is it sounds like a quick fix but really it solves nothing beyond disarming law abiding citizens. If swords was in place of guns, liberal politicians would still want to keep swords out of the hands of the common folk. Why? Because an unarmed population is easier to control. That is why all throughout history Kings and other leaders wanted to keep their people from arming themselves. Armed Americans means the government *
1 up
Apparently mass shootings do occur every day in America. Also Las Vegas wasn't the only mass shooting that day, but I guess it got over shadowed.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/03/us/how-often-do-mass-shootings-occur-on-average-every-day-records-show.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/one-mass-shooting-every-day-seven-facts-gun-violence-america/
reply
0 ups
*Continued
will always be a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

Consider this quote by Niccolo Machiavelli. "Among other evils which being unarmed brings you, it causes you to be despised."
reply
3 ups, 4 replies
reply
[deleted]
5 ups
reply
5 ups
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Guns are also responsible for saving people's lives. And I don't just means guns in the hands of police and military.
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Oh, and let's just pretend that they're not responsible for killing millions of people including children, mothers, grandparents, fathers, and even probably unborn children. But, of course, guns "save lives".
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
So tell me, if you’re ever confronted by a deranged individual with a weapon of any type, what exactly would you like to do about it? Defend yourself, or hope the police get there in time?
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
If the person had no gun in the first place, it would be a lot harder to kill people. Yes, getting rid of guns wouldn't end all crime, but it would save a lot of people's lives. You think if the man who killed all of the people in Vegas had a knife he would've been able to kill so many people in so little time and from so far away? If he had a knife he wouldn't have been able to kill anyone from that far away. And tell me again who you should keep guns?
reply
1 up
So now tell me how you propose to remove all guns from society.
reply
1 up
woo
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
That is a bad analogy.....pencils can't easily kill thousands of people and neither can bad grades...
reply
3 ups, 1 reply
Also, studdies show that there actually would be less crime without guns and, obviously, there would be less mass shootings. You can't shoot without guns. Why do you Americans always think of getting rid of guns in such a bad way anyways? Do you people seriously care more about your "freedom" (aka having the chance of getting shot while going to a music festival) than the lives of fellow Americans?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither.” - Benjamin Franklin

You want safety? You’ll get it only if there is a police officer constantly outside every door. And only then, when your liberties have been demolished, would you realize the mistake in your reasoning. By which time it would be too late.
reply
0 ups, 2 replies
I understand that you can never be fully safe, but that doesn't change the fact that guns kill a lot of people. And yes, I understand that guns can't kill by themselves and that it's the person who uses it who is the monster, but it is the fact that these bad people can easily get these killing machines. How many shootings will it take for Americans to see this?
reply
0 ups
You are ignoring the fact that guns are ALREADY IN SOCIETY. They cannot be removed; in a utopian world where guns had never existed, different story. However they do exist, and even going door-to-door seizing all guns wouldn’t get them all. Not to mention, that would spark a civil war on an unprecedented scale.

You talk about “gun control” as though enacting it would suddenly remove guns from this country. It wouldn’t, nor would it even slow down a criminal.

Examining the mind of a mass murderer is too long to go into here, but had the Texas monster not had access (theoretically) to any forearms
reply
0 ups, 1 reply
*firearms, he still would’ve wanted to kill a lot of people. So what’s his alternative? Knife or bomb? Knife, eh, won’t work. So bomb. It couldn’t have been stopped; he still would’ve found some way to do it. A criminal, lacking a gun, WILL find another tool to carry out his crime. Only without a gun, a law-abiding citizen will have lost their best defensive tool.
reply
0 ups
Okay, let's stop fighting. Everyone has they own opinions, besides, even if America never decides to add a little gun control (NOT REMOVING THEM, JUST MAKING THEM HARDER TO GET), It doesn't affect me, I don't live in America.
reply
3 ups
Gun Control isn't working out, though..
reply
3 ups
reply
2 ups
nice job. very creative
reply
[deleted]
2 ups
reply
6 ups, 2 replies
Can pencils spray 100 bullets a minute and kill kids?
reply
3 ups
Neither can a gun. At least by itself, it can't. The point of the meme is telling people to take personal responsibility and stop blaming the guns.
reply
2 ups
Dude. Not cool.
reply
2 ups
reply
[deleted]
2 ups
Upvote!
reply
2 ups
If there are no pencils how can people get bad grades?
reply
2 ups
reply
2 ups
So thats why I only have a B in math
reply
2 ups
reply
3 ups
Then only flunkies will be able to take tests :)
reply
1 up
Maybe they are and it is swept under the rug? ever think THAT!
reply
1 up
reply
1 up
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH! GOT EEM!
reply
1 up
Ha
reply
1 up, 2 replies
So if rocket propelled grenades are not a problem, why are they illegal?
reply
1 up, 1 reply
Because wousey liberals voted them illegal.
reply
0 ups
Correct, and you now you see how gun regulation works and saves lives. thanks.
reply
1 up
they didn't want to ban marker pens too
reply
1 up
boy
Flip Settings
Creepy Condescending Wonka memeRe-caption this meme

Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator

Show embed codes
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
SO IF GUNS ARE THE PROBLEM IN CRIME, THEN; WHY ARE NOT PENCILS RESPONSIBLE FOR BAD GRADES!?
hotkeys: D = random, W = like, S = dislike, A = back
Feedback