you have A LOT of funny memes!

If that was indeed directed towards myself.. Thanks :D

it was.

I almost shit myself laughing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I hope any Americans who didn't know will read that.

If it makes you feel any better, I'm American.

Having lived in Canada for a few years, I'm sure that millions don't know who the Mounties are---enough think it's a state! I am American.

That's correct

Wow. You are petty. You're seriously refusing to look for something because you say "It doesn't exist"? I also provided my sources. You can keep telling yourself that lie all you want, but it won't change anything.

regardless of my last meme (which demonstrates how stupid what you're saying is), here is a NYT article (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/01/opinion/sunday/promises-but-from-voters.html) talking about people on both sides of the aisle promising to leave the country if someone from the other side is elected. they name ONE contemporary republican (if you can call him that) - stephen baldwin. stephen f'n baldwin v. high ranking democrats in government (one of which made good on his promise and left...thank g-d and good riddance!) because this country means nothing to a liberal unless it fits into your european fantasies of a socialist (re: communist) utopia, where atheism is the only acceptable religion and no one is allowed to question or challenge the leftie dogma that the liberal leaders spew from their golden soap boxes.

Perhaps you could stop repeating the things you heard on Fox News and provide your definition of a "Contemporary Republican"? If you're not going to go into any detail, then I'd say a contemporary Republican is someone who supports the contemporary Republican party. Perhaps you could tell me how Dick Morris, Republican commentator pollster, and author of "Screwed!" isn't a contemporary Republican?Also, it seems that only one of the people who threatened to leave if a Republican won was a "leading democrat in government", while the rest were actors/actresses, comedians, and singers. While they support Democrats, they certainly aren't in the government.

I already pointed out the fact that you just spewed things you heard on fox news, but here's everything wrong with it. 1. If this country "meant nothing" to Liberals, then why do they take the time to run for office during times like the Great Depression and the more recent recession, which were both caused by Republican policies and Wall Street? And why is it that our most recent president brought us out of that recession and our last Liberal president brought our country to prosperity? 2. Seriously, loom up the differences between Communism and Socialism. They're two different ideals and policies. 3. I'm actually a catholic, Obama and Carter are Christian and the bible talks about giving to the poorand forgiveness. 4. Golden soap boxes? That's a new one. But, if anyone actually has those, it would be the top 1%, which Republicans so happily represent.

FYI, in case you're too lazy to fact check my last post:
NYT analyzing bush and cheney's repeated warnings about looming recession while confirming that clinton and other dems were dismissing warnings: http://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/22/news/22iht-bush.2.t_5.html

see here also for a list of 17 times bush gave warnings about the pending financial collapse before it happened: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2010/05/pelosi-caught-in-major-lie-says-bush-didnt-warn-congress-about-financial-crisis-records-show-he-warned-congress-17-in-2008-alone/

2003 NYT article on Bush efforts to reign in freddie and fannie: "The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry." http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/11/business/new-agency-proposed-to-oversee-freddie-mac-and-fannie-mae.html

however, because of democrats' threats to filibuster the bill (including obama, who was the second largest recipient of lobbying money from fannie and freddie), the bill died. see here: http://www.crimeandfederalism.com/2008/09/federal-housing.html and here: https://tjhancock.wordpress.com/housing-bubble-financial-crisis-detailed-comprehensive-assessment/ and here: http://www.femisex.com/content/obama-threatened-filibuster-calls-reform-fannie-mae-freddie-mac-where-was-press-coverage

and bush passing the first and most important bailout package: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/26987291/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/t/bush-signs-billion-financial-bailout-bill/

You're still on this???? How cute! I wonder who's paying hillary's insane speaking fees. Probably those rich republicans you're preaching about. Obama is an atheist, at best, though I don't judge anyone's relationship with his or her G-d. You clearly know NOTHING about American politics if you think republican policies lead to the recession. (1) when bush was running for office the first time, he predicted the recession and clinton's and all other dems and the media skewered him for it. He saw it coming because of the dot com bubble and because Clinton - not a Republican - did away with the regulations controlling the banks. (2) when bush took office he wanted to reign in Freddie and Fannie. Guess which two democrats in the Senate were pushed by lobbyists to the forefront of defeating bush's legislation on THREE separate occasions: Clinton and Obama. (3) the bailouts that everyone agrees saved the economy were proposed and passed while bush was in office. As for the Democrats looking to lead this country... look at their hallmark achievements - always those either taking this country away from its judeo-christian roots or pulling us away from capitalism to socialism. you are clearly an uneducated sheep of the latest and greatest msnbc talking pieces or whatever your Uber-liberal social studies teacher is spewing this week. I'll not waste any more time on an idiot. Feel free to keep bleating without consequence of a response.

http://www.cbc.ca/newsblogs/yourcommunity/2012/11/republicans-threaten-move-to-canada-after-obama-win.html

http://www.buzzfeed.com/jwherrman/37-people-who-say-theyre-moving-to-australia-if-o#.xs2LkL45y

Would you like me to find more sources that show that Conservatives threatened to leave if Obama won? Or perhaps you can swallow your pride and admit both parties have said this?

this is awesome. most of the people in the first article are liberals threatening to move if obama didn't win. and you chose a buzzfeed article of a bunch of random who-the-f**k-are-they's twitter feeds?!? really? find me some people that actually represent the conservative movement and we'll talk.

Did you read the entire article. In the middle, it showed several tweets of people who vowed to move to Canada after Obama won. What exactly is wrong with voters saying what they want to do? They vote for your candidates and support your ideas so what makes their voices meaningless? They are Conservatives if they support Conservative candidates, so if they say they will leave the country, it still counts as Conservatives wanting to leave the country. So what if their names aren't known across the country. They support your Conservative candidates. Are you saying that your leaders don't represent their voters?

Canada is more enlightened than Americans realize. I love Canada.

I plan to go to Abbotsford area I think...

Look me up. I'm nearby.

Good to know.

Hillary is not getting elected unless Bernie drops out.. That and she is under FBI investigation.. Yeah, I guess if she breaks the law it qualifies her for some new government position though.

I think most are.

LOL so true. She always manages to find a way to protect herself, and all her sheeple followers drink it right up! (cherry koolaid, anyone?)

Actually, Bernie has no path to the nomination mathematically, and will likely drop out March 15/16. Also, she's not under FBI investigation, at this point only the fellow who set up her server is, and there will in all likelihood be zero charges against anyone since using private servers for gov business was not proscribed at that time and none of the emails found were classified at that time.

So everyone had best practice saying "President Clinton" again, and start thinking of better memes than "she lies, she's a witch", otherwise it's going to be a repetitive 8 years during her Presidency.

Well, the FBI know she had a private server that she had wiped, so above all else she should at least be charged for obstruction of justice.

Nope, the hard drive was being reused, was not "wiped", and then the HD was sent to the FBI/DOJ when requested-- and they found zero classified emails. But I am sure you are calling for Bush, Cheney, and Priebus to be charged with "losing"/ wiping 5-30 million email, or Powell and Rice, etc., to be charged for using public servers for Dept. of State business and deleting those emails.

There is likely nothing to charge anyone over, the Trey Gowdy desperation fishing expedition is long over.

Zero emails on Clinton's server were classified at the time, private servers were usesd by many in gov at the time as it was not against the law.

Search Inbox for "Classfied". 30,000 found. Ctrl-A, delete all. And not being marked classified does not mean it is not, she was head of State, one would think....

Lol.. Hillary is repeating '08 and we all know it!