This is what the left fights for. Evil and vile.

Evil incarnate

The horror... I do respect Trump for leaving this up to the states to decide, but I also wish he would just outright ban it. Any doctor that gives an abortion should be tried with infanticide and lose their job.

I agree, but he really isn't able to do that. Leaving it up to the states is a start and it's more constitutional.

He himself can't but if it were to go through all the legal processes via those below the president, it is very possible. But I don't see that happening anytime soon unfortunately...

As long as it doesn't harm those baby parts, they're fine with it...

how

I wish that was done to me sometimes

I'm sure you're not the only one that wishes that happened to you

You need Jesus Christ.

Another communist?

You need Jesus. Do you know him?

Well I think he was another communist.

What you think does not change the fact that you need him.

This is propaganda, and (unsurprise) false. Your graphic shows a baby somewhere in the mid to late 2nd trimester.

According to the CDC's data from 2021: "During 2012–2021, the percentage of abortions performed at >13 weeks’ gestation remained ≤8.7%. In 2021, the highest percentage of abortions were performed by early medication abortion at ≤9 weeks’ gestation (53.0%), followed by surgical abortion at ≤13 weeks’ gestation (37.6%), surgical abortion at >13 weeks’ gestation (6.4%), and medication abortion at >9 weeks’ gestation (3.0%); all other methods were uncommon (<0.1%). Among those that were eligible (≤9 weeks’ gestation), 66.6% of abortions were early medication abortions."

If you don't like later abortions, fight against abortion bans: they significantly increase later term, riskier abortions.

False as in the video is fake, or as in in making it seem as if a abortions are generally at that stage? Because the image appears to be authentic.

False as in "this does not represent a normal abortion". The OP says, "This is [the evil & vile thing] the left is fighting for": utter misrepresentation.

Sure, the image might well be authentic, but even so, not sure about the context. Looking at the image, it might even be a delivery with forceps.

Ah, taking one rarer scenario and using it to make some sort of blanket judgment against all members of a wide movement.

Interesting point, although we still can't discount the possibility that it actually is an abortion.

It certainly COULD be, although it's clearly not a D&C. The anti-abortion movement has a history of promulgating quite deceptive images of abortion (ie, pictures of stillbirths).

Aye, as if shock value and exaggeration are the only way they can prove their point.

or just ban abortion after six weeks

Four weeks after conception, hmm? Very few women are even certain that they're pregnant at that point.

If women want to get rid of the baby, then why would they engage in intercourse??? Becoming pregnant is what they risk when they engage in the act. I do think that in the case of r*pe, it is semi-justifiable and I understand why an abortion would be wanted. But the woman should try to get it done ASAP so that the baby isn't as formed. Mutations and birth defects can be justified, but those are very rare and it depends on the mutation. If less women decided to have unnecessary s*x, there would be no need for abortion. Actions have consequences.

They engage in intercourse for the same reason as the man who engages in course with them do. Well, usually, as in some cases not exactly the same reason as when coercion comes to play or in others where they're trying to trap the man into a longer term relationship, etc.

So, you, personally, are planning only to have sex when you are married and planning to have a baby. That's lovely for you, and good luck with that, but it's not a reasonable way for most of the 8 billion people on earth to live.

Also, why are you saying "If less women decided to have unnecessary sex"? (Notice, it's not something to be ashamed of: you can spell the whole word!) Pregnancy, by definition, happens when two people have sex, and they aren't both women.

Go preach to boys, and let the rest of us control our own bodies.

I never said they were both women. The women just need to stop going out to get unnecessary sex.

Also, sidebar, the fetus/baby isn't formed enough to be viable until week 24 or so. At week 13 (only 11 weeks after the sex, it still doesn't have lungs, or most parts that you'd recognize as human. Traditionally, abortion before "quickening", ie viability, was legal in British common law and in the colonial US. Here's what the Center for American Progress has to say about the history:

"The Puritans brought their laws on abortion from merry old England, where the procedure was also legal until quickening. Although the Puritans changed much of England’s legal system when they established their “city upon a hill,” they kept abortion as a part of Puritan family life, allowing women to choose when and if they would become mothers—whether for the first time or the fifth time.

Colonial women procured prequickening abortions mainly with the help of other women in their communities; skilled midwives knew which herbs could cause a woman to abort, and early American medical books even gave instructions for “suppressing the courses,” or inducing an abortion. "

Interestingly, the majority of American women who chose to have abortions already have children. They are doing what they can to choose a good life for themselves and the children they have.

Finally, here's a window into the anti-abortion dystopia the Right has been moving us toward: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/05/16/what-actually-happens-when-a-country-bans-abortion-romania-alabama/

Ask yourself: do you want that for yourself and the people around you?

Abortion is a moral question. It boils down to what you consider to be alive. I and many others believe that the human is created upon conception, but many people believe otherwise. You have a different idea of when life starts and I respect your opinion, yet I strongly disagree with it. Also since 1973, roughly 63 million abortions have occured in America alone. Let's say 1 million were because of r*pe or a birth defect. That leaves 62 million people who weren't born and thus couldn't have kids of their own. Abortion is one of the things contributing to declining birth rates, which is becoming a bigger issue as the years progress. Both Japan and South Korea are dying out due to a lack of births. If 62 million abortions were only in the US, imagine to global total. I respect your right to an opinion, but I and many others see this as an issue.

8 billion people on this planet . . . if people want to be in control of how many children they have, I'm not going to worry about "declining birth rates".

You can get an OTC pregnancy test at nearly any pharmacy and know within a day or two. By then the hormones are in the bloodstream and will show up in a urine test.

So, you get a pregnancy test after every time you have sex? 1. expensive; 2. a little sad.

3. Not society’s problem. Don’t have sex if you don’t want the risks.

So, no sex for you, then. Doesn't sound like you'd enjoy it, anyway.

1 If the condom break or if you just let the guy dump inside you , yea you should get a OTC pregnancy test. That is being called being responsible .

"you just let the guy" . . . It's fantastically weird how all the scenarios are the woman's responsibility by this rhetoric, and yet the next step is not her choice.

So, how many times have you had to get an OTC pregnancy test? How comfortable are you prescribing this for other people?

Since she made the choice to let him do that, it is her choice.

So, you're really going hard against IVF.

Kind of sounds like it was HIS choice.

Wrong. It’s both their responsibility.

But, by your logic, you're fine with a woman having a medication abortion: you just want her to get it done within a week of having sex? Why do you think that the first six weeks are such a magical window?