Oh and by the way, this argument only exist because people like you interpret religious text that was written millennia ago, in different ancient writing styles, with different ancient meanings, like it was written today. This isn’t Language Arts class! Do your homework before you read something as old as the Bible.
You do realize that 4 accounts that have small variations in detail would be less suspicious than 4 accounts that are exactly the same, right? After all, they are 4 different accounts from 4 different viewpoints, and each are written differently to suit a different audience.
The order of different events and the ways that each gospel were written suggests different perspective and oral traditions.
4 exact accounts suggest collusion. Collusion is fabrication, not evidence.
Some stuff you label as "contradictions" aren't contradictions, if not all of them.
John Talks about Mary being there in 20:2, but Mary says "we", which suggests that others went with her. “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we don’t know where they have put him!”
Variations in the numbers of angels are complementary, not contradictory. Matthew and Mark focus on one angel, which is the one who talks, while the latter focus on all the angels. The time is complementary as well, because they are in the early morning timeline. The same can be said for when they appeared.
Also, if you keep reading the Bible literally, than the actual meaning gets thrown out of the window. The "zombies" part can be applied as symbolic for example.
