NAZI = Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei. In English: National SOCIALIST German Workers' Party

Ridiculous that it took that much for Graham Platner to drop out. And the Democrats supported him up to this point. He is literally everything they accuse Trump of.

I just found out today that the New York Times knew about this months before it got out and they tried to cover it up.

Was that taken when Trump was throwing him out of Mar-A-Lago? Or was it just before he blew the whistle on him?

Either way it was 22 years ago they had a falling out. Where he was best friends with Jailbait Bill Clinton till Hillary had him whacked.

Technically speaking it was a Totenkopf not a Swastika.

I learn something new every day. I just kept hearing everyone call it a swastika and I just never cared enough to do any more research.

I had to look up what a Totenkopf was because I didn't know. It is another Nazi symbol although it doesn't have to be. Totenkopf is just the German word for skull and crossbones and skull and crossbones where used by pirates and on cans or bottles that contained poison. The Totenkopf was stylized for the Nazis.

How do you have access to the whole internet yet are consistently this wrong?

HOW?!?

I just now how to navigate around all of the Democrat propaganda. That is how I am constantly correct. Well.... I have made a few mistakes on ImgFlip over the years and I try to correct them when I can. But generally speaking I always try to go to the source material when possible. I try to avoid commentary unless that is where I first hear something. If it interest me enough then I go to the source to see if the conservative commentator is correctly quoting the source. I haven't found an discrepancies so far.

However, with leftists, the source NEVER agrees with the leftist propaganda unless the source has been altered. I first learn about the Labor Participation Rate kept by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This is the number of jobs available compared to the number of working age adults. It is different than the Unemployment Rate which the media always quotes. The Unemployment Rate is the number of people applying or are currently getting unemployment compensation. That rate is not an accurate picture of employment. The Labor Participation Rate is a much better stat.

From time to time I would look it up starting (I think) at the end of Bush's 2nd term in office. It might have been at the beginning. Unfortunately, I never saved any of that data. I would just look at it from time to time. Then Biden got in office. I looked up then and the numbers changed. That is why I wish I would have saved the previous charts. All of the sudden Trump's first term went from showing a decent picture of the employment rate to less than Biden. And Biden's numbers showed much better employment rates. I knew the numbers got cooked but I could not prove it.

But it is stuff like that. There are a lot of times that I just have little to no interest in the story or event. I really had no interest in Platner. When I heard he had a swastika I just accepted. I was told by someone else on ImgFlip that it was a Totenkopf and not a swastika. So I looked up what a Totenkopf was. Technically speaking it is just the German word for skull and crossbones. Totenkopf translates into English as something like "Death Skull". The Nazi Totenkopf was styled from what we are used to seeing on flags in pirate movies. So if he had a Nazi Totenkopf then it really doesn't matter if it was a swastika or not. He allegedly tried to cover it up with a Celtic knot tattoo.

I found out today that the New York Times knew about the Totenkopf weeks ago and covered it up.

They didn't cover it up. It was a subject of discussion. That's why he got the covering tattoo.

Just because you're not plugged into Democratic primary discussions doesn't mean it didn't happen. It turns out he'd been sexting other women when he was married. Then it came out that he was doing that within a week or two of getting married. Of course, now the sexual assault allegations have been brought forward.

Which is why he's lost all support from the local, state, and federal Democratic parties. He dropped out yesterday.

Nazis and Democrats are both evil? Nope, here's why:
1. Nazis took over an entire country and evicted all the jews. (coindentally, republicans are doing the same with people of color)
2. Democrats (not all, but all the famous ones), have advocated for free rights for all.
3. If democrats were nazis, Trump would be dead and we'd be running the government. Is he dead? Nope, let's move on.
4. Most, but not all, democrats support Lgbt rights. I'm not saying some republicans don't but, WE'RE THE ONES WHO BEGAN ADVOCATING for rights in the early 1900s.
5. Why would we advocate for killing Jews/Muslims? We benefit from none it.

Bounce back from that, republican.

1. Give me one example of where Republicans are evicting people of color. Just one example.
2. Nonsense. Democrats hate freedom.
3. Well the Nazis weren't always in power in Germany. They had to be voted in. Democrats cheat their way into political power. So they one upped the Nazis. But I was talking about political ideology and not what the Nazi did once the got power. The ran on a political platform that can be found on the internet. And that platform is not that dissimilar to the Democrat party. Free health care, free education, etc.
4 What rights are LGBT+ are missing? I don't see anywhere in the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the Federalist Papers or anything the founding father said that excluded anyone with same sex attraction or gender dysphoria from having the same basic rights as everyone else?
5 Democrats are mostly pro-Palestine. If you are pro-Palestine then you are antisemitic. And considering the Quran instructs Muslims to exterminate every Jew on the planet then to support Palestine then you support the genocide of Jews. Now to be fair there are some Republicans turning pro-Palestinian. But I am seeing this more as a fulfillment of Biblical prophecy where it says the world will turn against the Jews just before Jesus returns. I just now that for myself, I do not support anyone who strongly believes in the commandments to murder Jews because in some places it does not specifically say Jews. Sometimes it calls them "the people of the book". The people of the book are Jews and Christians and the book is the Bible, Old and New Testament.

Is that a good enough bounce. BTW I am not a Republican. I used to be but I left the Republican party about 15 years ago. I am a member of the Constitution party because I believe in the Constitution and the government that the founding fathers left for us. I believe is freedom and I do not find that same belief in anything the Democrat party advocates. All I see is that Democrats want to cede all political power to the government.

Real Americans love Ronald Reagan, not this Nazi Platner guy imgflip.com/i/aw92aq

It just show the absolute stupidity of the left to call people names that they have no clue what they mean. The just know that Nazi and fascist are bad so they call everyone who are not the true believers in their bizarre ideology, those names.

How you can know they are stupid is because if you study what fascism really is, it is a much closer definition of what they believe than anything on the right. You have to go back to Giovanni Gentile, the man who came up with the political ideology he called fascism. He was Italian and he used the name because of a symbol used by the ancient Romans. It was the fasci or bundle of sticks or rods. In the middle of that bundle was a war hammer. It meant that they people were to be united in service of the government. The war hammer was a sign of power. Gentile kept referring to the government as a benevolent government. I guess he, like Marx, just could not get it through their heads that when you give that much power to the government it never ends well for the people.

BTW Reagan was awesome. I have 2 favorite presidents of the 20th century, Calvin Coolidge and Ronald Reagan. Incidentally Reagan was a big fan of Coolidge also.

1. They hired ICE.

1. So don't you think that legal status plays any role at all? Like if the whitest guy on the planet was in this country illegally do you think that ICE would let him stay? And if you say "yes" you clearly do not understand why ICE was formed.

Here is a hint: It has NOTHING to do with skin color.

What you have been told is that people who are NOT citizens or have NO legal documentation for being in this country are no different than those who are citizens or have legal documentation for being in this country. That is wrong. If a white Canadian sneaked across our northern border and ICE found out about him or her, they would send them back to Canada, just like anyone else who crossed our southern border.

Did you know that Obama deported more people, using ICE, than Trump? Is it only okay to deport people if a Democrat is president?

Did you know that when Biden opened our southern border he let in 100,000 Islamic terrorists (and that is just that we know of). He gave a huge boost to the human traffickers. It turned Phoenix, Arizona into the kidnap capital of the US.

BTW how dare you use the expression "people of color". You deny each race or ethnicity their unique cultures, their individuality and their identity. You deny their individual opinions or thoughts. You just lump them all into a group and then claim ownership of that group. You don't care about who they are all you care about is their skin color which you only care about for political purposes. You are using (or think you are using) all of those various groups of people as if they all march in lockstep with you. And the worst thing is that you are pitting them against white people (who are also very diverse and have their own cultures, thoughts and opinions) just to have your stupid little Marxist class divisions. Because without your oppressed and oppressor crap you have nothing. No one with a brain could ever except any form of Marxism without pitting two groups against each other. Marxism only plays well to the extremely low IQ people.

Sorry about the rant but that just set me off. I get so sick and tired of the left constantly categorizing people into little collectives. LGBT+ is another pointless collective of people who have absolutely nothing in common other than they are leftists. Any person who can think for themselves are thrown out of those collectives as if they don't exist. You guys even have the nerve to call Asians "white adjacent" because are successful.

2. Democrats are also known as Liberals, which can be understood as Liberty.
3. If the Democrats cheated their way to power, then why is Trump president?
4. They're might not be restricted by rights, but they get discriminated against in the workplace.

4. If they are restricted and/or discriminated in the work place then they are in violation of the law. What more do you want. That law is part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. But that is not an answer to the question, what rights are the LGBT+ people missing?

Do you know what a right is? A right is a freedom that does not infringe on someone else's right. Rights can be protected by law but the law but a right is not a law, it is more of a concept. It is what freedom is build around.

For example: Abortion is always called a right by the left but that is impossible. It infringes on the right to life of the baby. The baby is NOT a part of the mother. It has it's own life started at conception. It does not matter if it is cognitive in the early stages, it is still human life and it is still murder. It makes no difference if a leftist activist Supreme Court added unnecessary verbiage to two previous court cases just to be quoted in Roe v Wade to magically find a "right" to an abortion. That is why it was overturned. It was NOT overturned because a bunch of right-wingers got on the court. There were lots of reasons Roe needed to be overturned. It had to do with an liberal activist supreme court who threw the constitution out and made up their own rules. That is NOT the job of the courts. They cannot and must not "legislate" from the bench. The founding fathers went way out of their way to make sure that all legislation comes exclusively from our representatives in the House of Representatives. They are supposed to represent us. The laws they vote for or against are supposed to be a reflection of what the people they serve want.

No one else has legislative powers, not the president and especially not unelected supreme court justices. Justices are only suppose to represent the Constitution and the Constitution is a document that ONLY restricts the government. Even though there have been amendments added by idiots to restrict people, that is not what the Constitution is all about. That is why it starts We The People and not We The Government. It is a document that tells the government what they can and cannot do to us.

2 Modern Liberals are at complete odds with Classical Liberalism. I am a Classical Liberal. I believe John Locke got it right. It happened in the early 20th Century and late 19th Century when for some bizarre reason Marxism became popular in Universities in Europe and the United States. Because they knew that "liberal" was a more popular word than "conservative" they took that word. Classical Conservatives is what Modern Liberals.

BTW John Locke is considered the father of liberalism. Which is now called classical liberalism.

This is why the Libertarian Party refused to be called the Liberal Party because they didn't want to be associated with you guys. They also have the root for Liberty in their name. They are also Classical Liberals.

3 Because Elon Musk bought Twitter. In the 2020 election conservatives were so badly censored they couldn't say anything. If a Republican tweeted that he saw strange things happening at the local election precinct he would have his account closed. Musk bought it. Threw out the FBI, threw out the leftist software developers, threw out the leftwing wing algorithms and opened the platform up to anyone and everyone. Everyone was watching and reporting on twitter when bizarre stuff was happening. And you guys tried but you kept getting called out.

Did you even notice that there were 20 million more votes for Biden then there was for Obama. When that was pointed it the left said, the population grew. But then Biden got 20 million more votes than Harris did so that excuse fell apart. Where did all of those 20 million voters come from and go to? That's a whole lot of people to suddenly appear and the vanish. And they vanished before Trump ever had a chance to deport the first illegal alien. There's a whole lot more that went on in the 2020 election that should have never happened. Like in one precinct when they were fudging votes, Trump had -900 votes. How do you get NEGATIVE votes. That is impossible. All votes start with 1 and then all go positive from there. But Trump went from positive and in the lead to -900 and then back to a positive number trailing Biden.

A Classical Liberal believes in small and limited government. They believe the individual has all political power. Most importantly the individual has freedom but that freedom is tempered with morality or self-governance. You guys believe is massive government with almost infinite power and control is necessary to keep people inline.

5. Why would a political side that promotes equality want to kill Muslims/Jews

My man

Or whatever pronouns/gender you use/are :3

Whatever you say 'Happy'-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKjxFJfcrcA

Demorhhoids have fought rights since 1968. They used to focus on the 2nd ammendment. During the Geritol Joe Era they gutted the 1st Ammendment. They've waged war on your right to privacy for years now.
The only rights Demorhhoids support are ones that don't exist. Like your right to commit Infanticide.

You mean, teen abortions and unplanned pregnancies? Both of which are unwanted and it's easier to get an abortion before the baby is technically 'alive.'

I turn my back for a short time, and what do I find? Observer ranting and foaming at the mouth like some lowly smelly animal... THING! For shame! Are you even really still Observer anymore? I wonder- smh... 🌙 🤕

A. You've run out of arguements, so you're just insulting me at this point. I guess it's the only tjing your braincell could do at this point.
B. It's a username, not how I decide to browse the internet.

I've had enough bullshit for today, good night.

Lighten up Francis 😜