No sense in calling your movement "pro-life" when you literally cause more deaths

Of course women might die giving birth if you let them give birth. What kind of logic is this? "Car accident deaths went up 100% since cars were invented"

nobody's making them have abortions

That's the problem
Mother's killing their own kids is another level of f**ked up depravity

But there will still be children. You're acting like everybody in the world will have to have abortions if they are legal, but if people want children, they can have children. There will still be babies. Also, you aren't an expert in pregnancy and abortions, so you shouldn't really give three f**ks about this kind of stuff in the way that you are doing it now.

That doesn't disqualify me from talking about them. It's a moral issue
How does the number of humans on the earth justify murder

You don't understand, many if these pregnancy related deaths are miscarriages and being denied removing the already dead fetus from being removed on some technicality of fetus being counted as "alive" even though they were suffering things like placenta and respiratory problems that prevented them from developing properly and they were counted as "alive" just for having a heartbeat or whatever. Here is an example of a Texas woman being denied treatment for her miscarriage due to Texas' "pro-life" laws:

https://www.texastribune.org/2024/10/30/texas-abortion-ban-josseli-barnica-death-miscarriage/

Well these cases do suck
Pro-life doesn't apply to miscarriages

1) RBG correctly stated that Roe was poor law, and under Constitutional Scrutiny, would not stand.
2) The UK has British Common Law Roots, as does the USA. Somehow in 1967, the UK created
legislation, passed it by vote, and it has been LAW since. Gestational Limits in place.

NOT ONE Pro-Choice candidate has ever written, nor brought legislation to the floor for a vote in the USA, nearly 6 decades after the UK law. Even though the Legal Precedence has been set in the UK.

-Legislators write law.
-The Federal Supreme Court interprets it as Constitutional.
-The Executive Branch executes the law in accordance for the legislative branch. Or, vetoes

Well maybe British law handles it better. Much better than "pro-life" Republican governors.