The Richest People in the world funded "No Kings"

Who worships a politician here? Trump is a flawed man just like the rest of us. However, he is a leader and if your mistaking people following a leader for people worshiping someone you might need to read your bible and study more. Ex. John had many followers but he wasn't worshipped by his disciples. I'm sure they glazed him while acknowledging his faults. However, that does not constitute the worship of him.

I would rather have trump as my president than a democrat who has claimed to be Christian while directly defending and supporting the murder of unborn children. Yes trump isn’t the most popular or best option for president but I would still have him than Obama or anyone else of the “Democratic” Party. I disagree with quite a few of his policies but I would rather him than Harris.

That's why libs hated Charlie Kirk so much.

Because you should not lust for a woman, seek forgiveness of your sins and repent.

The bible is the Most Historically Accurate book in history. It's not "Fairy Tales" it is real events. Prophesies from the bible predicted and showed accurate. Take Danial for example, He predicted the Greeks conquest and through his writings in Maccabees the words were proven when the Priest showed then to Alexander the Great. We can prove all this happened. Science has proved Abram, Isaac, Jacob, David, Solomon, Jesus, Paul and, so many more people were real. There is too much undeniable evidence to say its Fairy Tales. Also, Your right sin is sin. However, we can be forgiven through the blood of Jesus that washes it away. Also, please, don't follow the teachings of Catholics. The bible is the only teaching you need. If you have tried to be forgiven through "Hailing Mary" you are being lied to. There is only one way to the father and that is through Jesus Crist. I also encourage and pray that you seek out the truth, whether through picking up the bible again or just going back to a church (Possibly a Assemblies of God Church) don't go back to the old law with its laws and requirements just as the Catholics has taught people to do.

Your ignorance of Christianity is beyond obvious and far exceeds my own, but going to church doesn’t make you an “anti-Christ” and Jesus was a Jew and followed the Old Testament. Yet his purpose was to fulfill the prophecy and open the covenant to all not just the Jews. Your knowledge is one of one liners and atheist hate diatribes, not of knowledge. How surprising…not!

Exactly. God didn't send Jesus down for only the Jews. All of us are His creation.

As a non Christian, Modda doesn't understand the religion

Exactly he only knows it from atheist dogma and slogans

The copypaster said something

You remember your religion? That.
The only way anyone can follow it is by following it. Any Roman pagan corrupted fakery is heresy.

As I said your rudimentary knowledge is an amazing display of ignorance of the religion and the difference in the Jewish covenant and Christianity.

That's nice.
Go ahead then, let us see what you got.

My gosh. So sad.

Jesus was raised by jews but he taught that “the only way to the father is THROUGH ME”

It is extremely accurate. You constantly prove that you don't know anything by saying that we don't even know if David, Solomon, Jesus Peter, and Paul and Mary existed. It is impossible to say that these people didn't exist. As for the other one's a book written 1000's of years ago accurately tells the land (Mesopotamia) and Egypt. Its so true that Abraham is taught about in PUBLIC school. Even school a world history class with a atheist teacher said that Abraham was a real person. We can prove many of these figures also existed because of the accuracy of their description of Egypt.

Jesus did exist and he was not in fact teaching Jewish faith. A large amount of outside sources say that he preached that he was the Messiah. He was not preaching the law, I want to have a intelligent conversation but when you say things like that it just shows how uneducated you are or are acting.

No amount of money can get you into heaven. The bible supports this. JESUS and a relationship with him is the ONLY way into Heaven.

Ok, I just got what the picture meant and Jesus Fulfilled the law as the 3rd verse says. In the first verse it says that the law will not pass away until the law is accomplished. Now, tell me What did Jesus say he did. I have no come to abolish the law or the Prophets. I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

The Mesopotamia and Egypt is about how the descriptions the books gave are accurate with the time.
I am in 9th grade and when I am in World History I can hear I can read. Its in the curriculum. I am not fabricating anything.
To start, you acknowledging outside sources says that Jesus was a Real Man. Yet still you go on about how you don't believe he even existed. Also, if Jesus just preached Judaism then why would the Roman's kill and prosecute Christens. As Judaism was a recognized religion. (or allowed whatever it is). How could the largest ever religion appear from a non-existent person. The reason I say that outside sources say that Jesus claimed to be the Messiah is because in every outside account they say that the Christens Worshiped Jesus as a God. If Jesus didn't claim to be a Messiah then why would so many people worship him? His death and life as recorded in the Gospels show that his message, his death, and of course you don't believe it but Resurrection all correlate with Old Testament Prophesies. It would be impossible to say that Jesus never claimed to be the Messiah and he instead preached Judaism because if you want to start pulling up bible scripters I can start to. If you want to quote from the Gospels that infers that in this conversation they are reliable sources.
61. But Jesus remained silent and gave no answer.
Again the high priest asked him, “Are you the Messiah, the Son of the Blessed One?”
62. “I am,” said Jesus. “And you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Mighty One and coming on the clouds of heaven.”
So Jesus did say he was the Messiah. Do you remember how the Law is also called a Covenant Promise. Once a promise is Fulfilled it is done. So, by fulfilling the law Jesus kept his promise and completed it. Therefore while not entirely voiding its significance is not longer what we have to live by.

https://hopenomatterwhat.com/historical-sources-outside-the-bible-that-mention-jesus-christ/
https://biblearchaeology.org/research/topics/general-apologetics/5275-top-ten-historical-references-to-jesus-outside-of-the-bible

They do not teach religion in public school. In the United States, anyways. They certainly are not teaching that Abraham was an actual historical figure, because there is nothing to back that.

Romans persecuted Jews, even obliterated their country and made it disappear from the map. Literally. They persecuted Jews for a couple of thousand years. Where have you been? Jesus was a Jew. Jesus did not preach Christianity. There was no such thing to preach back then.

Cyrus the Great was God? He wasn't even Jewish.
Messiahs, like King Cyrus, are not God or the sons of God, they are liberators of the Jews who would then lead the country into a period of peace and prosperity. That's what a messiah does. That is something Jesus never did. Ever. Not even slightly. Bar Kokhba did lead a revolt against the Romans and set up a region that was independent of them for a few years. He was a messiah, do you worship him as the Son of God?

The Gospels were written a century or more after, whatever they say about prophecy, isn't. Writing a century or for later that something fulfilled prophecy is irrelevant. Last thing Jesus told his followers is that he would be back within their lifetimes, before their generation came to pass. Unless you got some 2,000-year-old Judeans hiding out somewhere, Jesus is going to be a little too too late to his own party.

Almost as many people as there are Christians believe that there is a God with a human body and an elephant's head with blue skin. Nearly as many Christians also believe (at some point in their life, anyways) in Santa Claus, the Easter bunny, and the Tooth Fairy. Call me an apostate, but I don't believe Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer is real.

I'm not having a discussion anymore with somebody in 9th grade, I'll end up saying more about your religion that you will regret, and I'd rather not do that. I already excised a small portion that would have.

Wow scared to debate a 9th grader, because there are many points I made that you didn't refute. I wasn't even planning on saying anything about my Grade however I had to Authenticate my account of Abraham being taught in the world history book. Your scared honestly. Your really are just a Joke. Like most liberals finding any excuses to stop debating because the other person is beating you.
I just read the bottom I usually read paragraph by paragraph and write a response. so I didn't see the end.

"Wow scared to debate a 9th grader, because there are many points I made that you didn't refute. I wasn't even planning on saying anything about my Grade however I had to Authenticate my account of Abraham being taught in the world history book. Your scared honestly. Your really are just a Joke. Like most liberals finding any excuses to stop debating because the other person is beating you.
I just read the bottom I usually read paragraph by paragraph and write a response. so I didn't see the end."

Wow,* scared to debate a 9th grader, because there are many points I made that you didn't refute. I wasn't even planning on saying anything about my grade*,* however I had to authenticate* my account of Abraham being taught in the world history book [?]. You're* scared,* honestly. You* really are just a Joke. Like most liberals,* finding any excuses to stop debating because the other person is beating you.
I just read the bottom.* I usually read paragraph by paragraph and write a response,* so I didn't see the end.

Oh, the irony,,,

Sorry for replying to this comment for some reason It wouldn't let me reply to your comment.
Your right they do not teach religion in public school however in World History they teach about religions. What they teach and expect you to know is the general history of each major religion Judaism, Christianity, Muslim, Hindu. The general history is taught not the religion. And they certainly are. 😊
They did persecute Jews and did obliterate them. However, most of those events are after the 2 Zealot revolts. Also, do you remember King Herod the Great (the first one) he was a Jew they let him and his decedents rules some of the territory. In I think the Judea area they instead installed a governor. The jews before the revolts were not just killed because they could they had autonomy and Before the Revolts were not hunted down and killed. Instead they became rich. Jesus was the 1st coming of Christ. What you don't understand is that the term "Cristan" is not self given or specifically named. As during the start of what we today call "Cristans" was called the Cult of Nazareth. (If I got it wrong its in Acts somewhere) They started being called "Christianity" when in Antioch. You act like Christianity is something so wildly different however it is not. The new testament starts with the life of Jesus and then goes into how we should live following Jesus. Not something completely different. Its just the continuation. Think of it like this. You got the first book of something yet its a series. Then Jesus came and Started writing the 2nd book. Then he will come back and write a book that will never end as We worship Jesus forever.

I have never said anything about Cyrus being a God. Then you gave one of the Zealots. However, its the Zealots who caused the destruction and exile of the Jews. He was not a liberator. You sound like a Jew. You are mistaking the 2nd coming of Christ with the 1st. Soon you will see what the Jews believe to be the 1st coming of Christ. Possibly even within our lifetime. None of the people you mentioned however fulfilled the prophets writing. "But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds we are healed." Isiah 53,5. This is one of the prophesies Jesus fulfilled. Not any of the other people you mentioned. The gospels were widespread a century or so after however were not written that far after. We know that through John and Mathew. Not complete|

What wouldn't let you reply to my comment?

King Herod, yeah, that rings a bell or three.

Pontius Pilate not sound familiar?

Jews did not instead become rich under Roman rule.

The first Messiah was Cyrus the Great, Shah of Iran. He's also the only Gentile Messiah there ever was.
A messiah is a messiah, not a god.

Jesus did absolutely nothing messianic. Ever.
He was supposed to come back and do so "before this generation comes to pass," as he promised his disciples. He didn't.

It's "Christians," not "Cristans"

Outsiders had called them Nazarenes, not Cult of Nazareth.

"Isaiah 53:5 is a classic example of mistranslation: the verse does not say, 'he was wounded for our transgressions and crushed for our iniquities', which could convey the vicarious suffering ascribed to Jesus. Rather, the proper translation is 'he was wounded because of our transgressions, and crushed because of our iniquities'. This conveys that the Servant suffered as a result of the sinfulness of others—not the opposite as Christians contend, that the Servant suffered to atone for the sins of others."

https://www.myrtlefieldhouse.com/david-gooding-answers/jewish-interpretation-isaiah-53

When referring to Jewish scripture, it's best to go by the proper Jewish translation as opposed to a fake Christian one retrofitted to fit a slanted Christian narrative.

Here, you posted your reply on the wrong meme. I'm fixing that now:

"Centa

Alright I figured it out there is a limit to the amount of replies available so starting here.
Yes, Pontius Pilate and Herod are familiar — that’s exactly why I pointed out that Judea had local rulers and autonomy before the revolts. Rome didn’t erase Judea until after the uprisings.
On Cyrus: calling him mashiach in Isaiah 45:1 doesn’t make him ‘the Messiah.’ In Hebrew, mashiach simply means ‘anointed for a task.’ Kings, priests, and even objects in the Temple were called that. It’s not the same category as the prophetic Messiah described in Isaiah 53, Daniel 7, or Psalm 22.
Saying ‘a messiah is a messiah’ ignores how the word is used in the Hebrew Bible. There’s a difference between a general anointed ruler and the eschatological figure Jews expected.
As for Jesus doing nothing messianic: His followers, His opponents, and the Roman authorities all treated Him as someone making messianic claims — that’s why the charge on the cross literally read ‘King of the Jews.’ Whether someone believes those claims is separate from whether they were made.
“When Jesus spoke about ‘this generation’ in Matthew 24, He was describing the events leading up to the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple. That destruction happened in 70 AD, within the lifetime of the people He was speaking to. This is why historians and scholars treat that part of the passage as referring to the fall of the Temple, not the final return.”
And yes, outsiders called early believers Nazarenes — that’s why I said the term wasn’t originally ‘Christian.’ The Antioch reference in Acts 11:26 is where the name actually appears."

Here's my reply to your comment that you posted for some strange reason on another completely unrelated meme:

A messiah is a messiah, even if you post the word in the original Hebrew. A messiah is not Yahweh cosplaying as a magician pulling fish out of a hat nor would he be one of the. Nephilim.

Cyrus the Great was the Anointed One, a Messiah. Got an issue with that? Take it up with them.

You were already given the corrected translation of Isaiah 53. If you have difficulty with that I suggest that perhaps you find a Rabbi or any other Jewish person versed on the subject and ask them if that's a referral to Jesus (Spoiler alert: It's not). I get the sneaking suspicion we all already know the answer you're going to get.

A generation is a generation, I have no idea what's the point of all this repetition, but the bottom line is even if Jesus lived to be 583 years old like Moses and Cain and Noah and the rest of the gang, he still did not do anything messianic, he did not return, he did not rebuild the Temple after the Romans destroyed it, he did not return the Jews back to Judea, he never became their king.

You might have heard people ask if have you found Jesus and the answer to that has been a resounding "No" for nearly two millennia. Because nobody has seen him since, if ever at all.

You said "Cult of Nazareth.' You said "Cristan."
I corrected you on that. There's no need for you to go on as if you had it right the first time, because you didn't.

Sorry I have been gone for the weekend. At a camp. I haven't read anything yet but I will reply soon js fyi

The amount of dillusion in this is crazy lmao

I see what you did there. 😉

It does get kinda yappy around here

Wanna see me yap

lol no lol

"we are skiping school to protest ice"

It's suppose to be skipping
Which is proving my point

I noticed how he posted inappropriate images in a NSFW stream, and said that he shouldn’t be doing that, for it goes against what the bible teaches, “But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart” -Matthew 5:28

Adam and Eve where the only two people on Earth. Ain't like he was gonna cheat.

What a surprise 😮