Let's examine what you're positing in neutral terms:
One political group is intensely focused on a government employee who is highly likely a federal-level accomplice to a planetwide pedophilia ring and possessed of the ability to stop, stymie investigations of said same, uniquely positioned to ensure prosecution, conviction of other accomplices is ablated/negated, has a documented track record of pardoning pedophiles.
One political group spends its time vilifying the other political group, defending a government employee who is highly likely a federal-level accomplice to a planetwide pedophilia ring and possessed of the ability to stop, stymie investigations of said same, uniquely positioned to ensure prosecution, conviction of other accomplices is ablated/negated, has a documented track record of pardoning pedophiles.
Given extant conditions:
Does it make sense to focus on low-level accomplices with no real power and who will most likely be prosecuted in due time barring intervention or the high-level accomplice who has the power to intervene, protect the pedophilia ring from consequence of its actions?
