Imgflip Logo Icon

This.

This. | They banned a sitting President from virtually all social media platforms, and the left cheered; Sorry if I don't care that an unfunny so-called comedian couldn't do his show anymore. | image tagged in memes,funny,political meme,politics,jimmy kimmel,president | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
346 views 22 upvotes Made by Jwolf4218 3 weeks ago in politics
36 Comments
3 ups, 3w,
1 reply
CARN E VIL | CARN EVIL | image tagged in carnevil,carnival,trump,maga,circus,clown | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Trump, cult, not | image tagged in trump cult not | made w/ Imgflip meme maker
Good grief.. give it a rest.
0 ups, 3w
I mean…
2 ups, 3w
All part of their 2020 election steal cover-up
1 up, 3w,
2 replies
He is a felon sooo like
2 ups, 3w,
2 replies
Why does the left keep saying crap like that.

A corrupt judge embellished the facts with hot air to turn a misdemeanor (that had passed the statute of limitations) into a felony. Trump appealed and the conviction was overturned because the conviction was idiotic. Trump was fraudulently made a felon for a minute or two but not any more.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
We say that because he still is a convicted felon. His felonies have not been overturned.

The fines were removed because the appeals court said he was too poor to pay that much.

But the felony convictions are still there
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Is it actually a felon when the courts acted illegally?
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Did the guy who's been convicted for fraud tell you that the court acted illegally?

Why do you believe anything he says?
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
I am far less connected to Trump than you think. I don't listen or read to every word he says. I don't follow him on social media I just watched what happen and came to my own conclusions.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Is this conclusion as wildly uninformed and poorly understood as your conclusions about Nazi healthcare systems? Or their actual policies that they wrote down?

'Cause I'm gonna bet it is.
2 ups, 3w,
2 replies
I could ask you the same question.

Could you remind me what my "conclusion about Nazi healthcare" was again? Because, other that they thought it should be provided by the state I never said anything about Nazi healthcare, I never talked about Nazi healthcare.

I think all state ran healthcare is atrocious. But for some insane reason, socialists seem to want to give the government all power over the individual. That's just idiotic.
1 up, 3w,
4 replies
Wasn't it you that claimed that the Democrats had the exact same healthcare plan that the Nazis had? And then I pointed out that the Nazis had inherited the Weimar Republic universal healthcare system and then set about excluding as many groups as they could as soon as they came into power?

Then you said something like Democratic policies are the same as the Nazis? And I said, "you do know you can google that stuff because the Nazis wrote it down." then I provided a link and then compared the Nazi policies to current Republican ones to show you how similar they were?

Yeah. I'm real certain that was you.

The whole rest of the developed world has better healthcare than we do. They don't go into debt because they get sick.

What is idiotic is thinking that a for-profit medical system that is administered by a for-profit health insurance industry results in anything other than a system optimized to put people into debt and squeeze every penny out of them possible.
0 ups, 2w
Oh and by the way, that's a seriously weak effort to try to blame the devastation caused by the Democrats locking down businesses on Trump. Democrats using Covid as a tool just about collapsed the economy, Trump had nothing to do with that.

The day Trump was elected in 2016 the economy begin to rebound. When Trump took office businesses then began to invest in themselves again after 8 years of not knowing what Obama was going to do to them.

Trump didn't have to enact any policy for the economy to rebound. All that needed to happen was for Hillary to lose.

And the economy just kept growing until COVID. I can't prove it but my opinion is that COVID was intentionally released to control the world's population and to take down capitalism. That's why the Democrats (and some Republicans) began an unconstitutional shutdown across America. It wiped out millions of small and midsized businesses all across America and around the world.

It was just what the World Economic Forum was hoping for. And I think that was what Event 201 was all about. In Oct 2019 Event 201 was held to discuss a global pandemic caused by a Corona virus. Remember, the corona virus is just the common cold virus. It would take an outside force to manipulate that virus into something deadly and ever so coincidentally the Wuhan lab, in partnership with Dr Fauci had such a virus they had been working on since 2014.

Event 201 was spun as how they would handle such an outbreak and help everyone.

But timing and my conspiracy theory mind (which I'm constantly trying to suppress) just looked at all of these things and who was involved and it's just too coincidental.

But like I said, I can't prove anything and I'm not trying to.
0 ups, 2w
"Yeah. Given your language style, you came of age in the Reagan era, which is the modern era peak "Free Market" fairy tale."

I turned 20 in 1978, when Carter was president.

The concept of the free market predates me and Reagan. Like I said, Adam Smith was the first to identify it, but one could argue that the seeds of it could be found in John Locke.

It was expanded by the Austrian school and later the Chicago schools of economics.

Your dismissal of it as a fairy tale tells me you're more inclined to Marx's pie-in-the-sky gibberish.

I will say this. An anarchists I knew pointed out the fact that there cannot be a free market if a government exists. I cannot argue against that but it is possible to have a much freer market than what we have now.

Freedom is always the answer, not more government control over our lives. We used to be much freer than we are now. In fact we have less freedom than we did when King George ruled the colonies.

"Because what happened as a result of the policies in each of those eras you mention?"

Are you aware of the Great Depression of 1919? No? Because it never happened. A stock market crash very much like the 1929 crash happened. The difference is Warren G Harding and Calvin Coolidge. They gave us one of the greatest eras of prosperity this nation has ever seen.

And despite history revisionism, Coolidge fid not cause the 1929 stock market crash and the subsequent depression. The crash was caused by Woodrow Wilson's Federal Reserve. The Fed cut the money supply too much and that caused a panic.

Herbert Hoover didn't understand that he should have just left it alone and it would have corrected itself. He began a series of policies to correct it that just made everything worse. He lost re-election because of that. FDR came on his policy of "change". But he didn't change anything. He just doubled down on Hoover's failed policy and instituted a bunch of his own failed policies. He somehow convinced the people that he was working hard on fixing the problem and they agreed and kept re-electing this turd. That was my parents generation. My parents came of age during the Great Depression.

If Hoover did what Coolidge and Harding did there would never have been a Great or any other kind of depression or recession. We would have rebounded in about 18 months, like it did in 1919.

We are still suffering under some of FDR's policies and many more Band-Aids supposed to fix the economy but only make it worse.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Reagan era???? What is my user name? Do you now who Adam Smith was? He was a contemporary of our founding fathers.

What I am saying is George Washington era, Calvin Coolidge, Reagan era and Trump era (if the Democrats, and a few Republicans, will stop being destructive jerks).
0 ups, 2w
Yeah. Given your language style, you came of age in the Reagan era, which is the modern era peak "Free Market" fairy tale.

But it's nice to see that your knowledge of US history is a cursory as your knowledge of Germany's history.

Because what happened as a result of the policies in each of those eras you mention?

I'll start you off with "Panic of 1792" and "Great Depression". And then remind me what happend at the end of the 1st Trump Presidency? And what is happening now at the beginning of his 2nd one?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
If I said, "exact same" then I was wrong. I don't think I said "exact". The Weimar Republic was also a socialist government and because of that it collapsed. Hitler came along and promised a new kind of socialism, called national socialism. It wasn't knew, it was the same old pig, Hitler just put a different shade of lipstick on it.

"then set about excluding as many groups as they could as soon as they came into power?"

Part of that was based on racism but the bigger part is they new that government healthcare is a massive drain on the money the government steals from the people. Hitler wanted to take over the world and he wasn't going to let healthcare get in his way.

Many Democrat ideas are the same as the Nazis. But if you are going to get into the minutia then you will find differences. I am talking about general policies. No two socialist nations are going to enact the same policies. Especially because socialism creates dictatorships and malignant narcissists are attracted to that kind of power like flies to a turd.

"What is idiotic is thinking that a for-profit medical system that is administered by a for-profit health insurance industry results in anything other than a system optimized to put people into debt and squeeze every penny out of them possible."

So in your world there are only 2 options?

That's a shame because the free market always favors the consumer, not the corporations. If we truly freed the market (by dumping a century of social programs that are just band-aids to cover a gaping wound) then we would not need health insurance companies.

Also if we could throw out all of the legislation that protects health insurance companies then we would see a lot of alternatives.

One alternative was tried by the insurance companies sued and won against a clinic. The clinic decided that for $70 per month their subscribers were entitled to every service the clinic provided and all prescription drugs were included.

The insurance companies when to the government to cry that this type of thing could spread and it would put them out of business. The government sided with the insurance companies. The government said, no, and that a clinic cannot offer "insurance" because they were not an "insurance company". The consumer lost because of corporatism, NOT capitalism.

When the government stops being a burden to the taxpayers, the people prosper. Socialism is a 100% burden on the taxpayer. It is slavery.
0 ups, 3w
The 'Free Market can fix it's is some Reagan era nonsense.
1 up, 3w,
4 replies
Oh my gosh, you've only said it like constantly.

How can you repeat this stuff how many times a day for how many years and have no recollection that you repeat this stuff how many times a day for how many years?
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
"If you're going to repeat the same stuff from the same script day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day and you think that that somehow is supposed to eventually brainwash everybody into believing it, then the least thing you can do is have the decency and self respect to actually read that script for once."

GET OFF MY LAWN!!!!

I warned you. I warned you. I told you I might have to yell that at you one day. Don't make me yell it again.

Script? I ain’t got no script! I don’t need no script! I don’t have any stinking script!

Actually everyone here, including you, just repeats themselves over and over and over and over. That's because conservatives are trying to talk some sense to leftists and it's just like talking to a brick wall. And leftists just keep repeating their insanity and when doesn't work they call conservatives "nazis" and "fascists".
0 ups, 3w
You're claiming that you never said something that you say practically on a daily basis.
That's the third thing in a couple of weeks you've claimed you didn't say despite saying it.

Here your claiming you never said that universal health was a Nazi invention, despite repeating the claim many a time.

You told Czechy that you never said violence was a Liberal thing a mere comment after saying it.

You keep insisting that I always tell you "I'm just messing with you" when I not only have I not said that, you have to me for years.

The so-called conservatives here are mostly foreigners, shills, and bots who post the same memes and comments straight from the St Petersburg issued script. If they don't like being labeled as Nazis and fascists, then perhaps they should find another hobby.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
You said: "You're claiming that you never said something that you say practically on a daily basis.
That's the third thing in a couple of weeks you've claimed you didn't say despite saying it.

Here your claiming you never said that universal health was a Nazi invention, despite repeating the claim many a time.

You told Czechy that you never said violence was a Liberal thing a mere comment after saying it.

You keep insisting that I always tell you "I'm just messing with you" when I not only have I not said that, you have to me for years.

The so-called conservatives here are mostly foreigners, shills, and bots who post the same memes and comments straight from the St Petersburg issued script. If they don't like being labeled as Nazis and fascists, then perhaps they should find another hobby."

Dude?!?!? Did someone pee in you Cheerios this morning?? Calm down a little. Life is not that brutal.

I also said, "GET OFF MY LAWN" but you completely ignored that. Look what you did. You just made me say that again. (No, there's no hidden meaning in that phrase, I'm just joking with you)

BTW it's not working. I'm still in a good mood. You're just gonna have to try harder to ruin my day. Well, more like ruin my minute. After all, when I'm not commenting to you I don't think about you. Well, except for when you told be that you are close to being homeless. I don't want to see that happen.
0 ups, 3w
Why would I want to ruin anybody's day? Why do you always think it's about antagonism and try to frame everything as such?

You wonder why you can't convince anybody of what you post, and you're basically just trying to convince them to have a ruined day? What purpose does that serve?
0 ups, 3w
You said: "Why would I want to ruin anybody's day? Why do you always think it's about antagonism and try to frame everything as such?

You wonder why you can't convince anybody of what you post, and you're basically just trying to convince them to have a ruined day? What purpose does that serve?"

Says the man who entire reason for being here is to proke and agitate.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
I'm old. It is my duty in life to repeat stuff you've already heard. Just wait, in another 10 years I'll start repeating myself several times in the same comment.

Actually, I think I will need to retire from all of this stuff long before then. At some point, I'll become even more incoherent than I already am.

I am also old enough to say, "Get off my lawn!" and don't think I won't tell you that one day.
0 ups, 3w
No, don't do that, don't.

If you're going to repeat the same stuff from the same script day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day and you think that that somehow is supposed to eventually brainwash everybody into believing it, then the least thing you can do is have the decency and self respect to actually read that script for once.

If this stuff is really slipping your mind, you wouldn't remember to print it over and over and over and over again.

Here, allow me to assist: The Nazis were the National SOCIALIST Party, and there are Democratic Socialists in Europe today, which means therefore that the Democrats in America are Socialists and therefore they are Nazis and they had free universal health care so therefore Obama's ACA means that Obama is literally Hitler's clone.

This is basically what you've been saying for years. Obama. Is literally Hitler. Because of the Weimar Republic. And therefore I'm a member of the German Nazi Party. Because my Spanish Taino Jewish Puerto Rican mother voted for John F Kennedy.

You've actually basically told me that. I'm a Nazi because she's was a registered Democrat. And that I'm responsible for slavery. The son of a Jibaro.
And you're telling me you don't remember this?

Like a Baptist Pastor once told me in 2001 about a family of hypocritical so-called religious fakers I knew, "Do they think they can fool God?"

Like my tagline says, all sins emerges from hypocrisy.
0 ups, 3w,
1 reply
They haven’t been turned over

He was found guilty multiple times by a jury of his PEERS his!!!
2 ups, 3w,
1 reply
Yeah... you refuse to recognize the appeal courts...
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
You refuse to recognize reality.

He's still got all 34 of those convictions.b
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Sure

As of November 26, 2025, Donald Trump has ONE conviction remaining, which is for 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in New York. However, he received an unconditional discharge, meaning he faces no further penalties or jail time for this conviction. PBS

LOL
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Right. You ran out there. You saw reality. You came back here. And promptly forgot it.

He's a what? Convicted felon.

With how many counts? 34.
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Yeah... you said 34 convictions... keep rowing... LOL
1 up, 3w,
1 reply
Yes. Due to our constitution and legal practices, a defendant only goes to trial 1 time for multiple crimes. Each one of those crimes is a separate charge, but we bundle them up to save time. It's referred to as a 'count'. As in, we counted up the number of times they did that and it's 34.

He did not go to trial 34 separate times. He was tried one time, and received 34 convictions all at once.

Because this involves Trump and your willful exclusion from reality, let's use an example.

So, as an example, let's say that someone is a serial killer. And for 10 years they killed 3 people every year. The FBI investigated and found a total of 34. The person was charged with 34 murders. The defendant was found guilty for all 34.

So, did they get only 1 murder conviction or did they get 34 all at one time?

Hint: the answer is 34.
1 up, 3w
Yup.. only one conviction remaining to be overturned... just like all the rest of the bogus charges dems tried to use to keep Trump from running.... thanks
Created with the Imgflip Meme Generator
IMAGE DESCRIPTION:
They banned a sitting President from virtually all social media platforms, and the left cheered; Sorry if I don't care that an unfunny so-called comedian couldn't do his show anymore.