Except that the propaganda generating political left is producing no proof of anything. They take everything out of context and rely on Dem voters either being too stupid or too intellectually lazy to do ANY independent research whatsoever.
So she was giving the textbook definition of pedophilia: 'Pedophilia is defined as a sexual interest in PREPUBESCENT CHILDREN. It is empirically linked with sexual offending against children.'
Now why was she motivated to do so? Perhaps it's because leftists typically make up definitions to suit their political narratives. Once they have CHANGED a definition they can double down on the false nature of their Political Propaganda. Naturally this irritates the propaganda dependent political Left.
How can leftists insisting upon changing definitions not be relevant? Here the Political Left thinks it's found a 'got you!' moment and -- as always -- they have come up with nothing.
IF A LEFT WING OR LIBERAL COMMENTATOR HAD TRIED TO DOWNPLAY THE ABUSE OF CHILDREN BY SAYING AT LEAST THEY WERE TEENS AND NOT BELOW THE AGE OF 10, THE RIGHT WING MEDIA WOULD BE DRAGGING THEM THROUGH THE COALS FOR BEING A GROOMER AND ENDORSING PEDOPHILLIA. WHERE’S THAT OUTRAGE NOW?
Caption this Meme
