Demomurder

This

Upvoted.

Or in other words, murder celebrating and murder promoting leftists . . . bring it on! Oh but then again most of you are 'all mouth and no trousers'.

Unfortunately, however, the core of mentally unstable radicals among you -- which your ideology protects and covers for no matter what -- demonstrably ARE quite capable of assaulting and committing murder . . . whether it is the murder of school children or the assassination of conservatives.

And with this mentality, only more problems will arise in America because we don't like talking to left or right leaning people despite that we had to get along in order to prevent the collapse of this nation. Should America even exist afterwards? Common sense tells us what we should use guns for, not entire ideologies, white supremacist groups like the KKK or Neo-Nazis are extremely far right and transcend hardcore conservatism, 83% of extremist related murders by white supremacists were gun related (https://www.adl.org/resources/report/murder-and-extremism-united-states-2023) but that doesn't mean the right side is evil, it's complex and not a fixed ideology.

I don't get what people mean by "dems are trying to take our guns so they can use them for themselves" while from a left leaning perspective, you can keep your guns because the 2nd amendment covers that for you, but for people trying to get guns there has to be more safety measures/background checks not only for someone who might cause a mass shooting, but also for people who are suicidal and they can easily buy a gun and end themselves because we care more about selling/the distribution of guns because money money money than people who need help. That's what we want---of course there's going to be people on either side who aren't mentally stable and want to inflict pain upon others or themselves, but viciously tearing each other apart just gives more opportunity for people to shoot more people---we will go nowhere if we cling to only left or only right views and defend them when instead, we ought to defend this crippling country we falsely call "United"

Hopefully you can see where I'm coming from, but if the only thing you're going to say is something that's not constructive, I won't continue the conversation because it is as useless as adding a drop of water into the ocean.

No sorry, white supremacists are fascist. That's a far left ideology. Only differing from socialism in that they were more honest about the means of production being controlled by the government for the people (national) rather than for the people (individual).

White supremacy isn't always fascist, but fascism is a far right viewpoint.

That's what you've been told, but what's the difference between government run socialism and fascism?

That's a far far Right Wing ideology.
Socialism is a cooperative control of the economy by the General public.

Run by the government in control of a few elite people*
Fixed it for you. On paper it sounds different, but in reality it boils down to the same thing with Fascism being a little more straightforward. In both systems a small group of people run the government and control the means of production the only difference being that they claim to do it in the name of the people (individual for socialism) or (national for Fascism).

No.

You can look these up you know.

Yes, you should look them up. Start with Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Fidel Castro. You'll quickly see the pattern.

Yeah, never heard of those guys, particularly in conjunction with the terms autocrat or dictator.
You can see why Dear Leader likes that ilk so much.

You should look them all up. They talked about socialist utopias.

Yeah, like lowering prices on day one and ending wars the day after the election.

You mean when congress and activist judges blocked everything he tried to lower prices on day ine?

That's a far Far Right Wing ideology.

Socialism is a cooperative control of the economy by the General public.
Fascism is top heavy centralized control of the economy.
They're quite literally the opposite.
In fact the only thing more opposite from Socialism is Medieval Monarchy where the monarch owns everything, including the public.

"Great point, why is it that Conservatives depend on enacting into law what is already long established tradition that has been favored by the general public? I'mmo use that one."

You'll first need to establish this is true with examples before proceeding to discuss it.

Dictionary definition of Conservative.

As I said you made a claim now back it up with facts and evidence.

Flagged again. Do you ever get tired of personal attacks and insults? How about backing your claim up with facts and evidence?

Nope sorry big government is a far left ideology.

No, the opposite actually.

I would suggest doing a little research, but this doesn't require any research at all.

Try again, this time with facts, reason, and logic. The left wants big government for the "greater good" while the right wants small government for "the individual".

No, the opposite.

Conservatives push for deregulation and more freedoms the liberals push for more regulations. It's very simple. Please educate yourself.

In the shortest terms, Conservatives wish to conserve, whereas Liberals seek to liberate.
Conserving takes a top heavy effort, liberating takes freedom.

It's not like they're playing musical chairs and you get to stop the music at your choice and switch places.

I understand sometimes words don't exactly translate easily or well, but here, in the American language, that's what those words mean.

Incorrect. It takes community and social pressure to preserve, it does not take top down rule. That's a leftist thing because if all the social support they want to implement was voluntary not enough people would do it. So they must force you to pay for things like social services. Also reported for libel.

Great point, why is it that Conservatives depend on enacting into law what is already long established tradition that has been favored by the general public? I'mmo use that one.

I'm saddened we're quick to nitpick details for an unrelated tangent while we are unaware that we stand at the precipice of the nation's demise.

We cannot cooperate because we judge based on the biased principles rooted in areas of influence, and without looking at the bigger picture, we're confined into our own small and separate spaces, fearing effective ideas that challenge our false securities.

What other choice do we have that will ensure the survival of our beloved republic? We need each other, and through each other we need acceptance that no side is better, more justified, more civil--we are beings trying to think of the best possible way we can live and coexist with one another comfortably, and not engaging with ideas from either side will only cause devastation to the progress we've made since the founding of this country.

You missed the real issues: word redefining, echo chambers with no debate, extremes being pushed, and radicalization. If we just had honest debates about ideas the best ideas from both sides would rise to the top and we'd all prosper.

Such "peaceful conservatives"

Yes, one guy out of literally millions. Whereas every other TikTok of the left is political violence.